Councilors said numerous meetings have been held where interested parties could comment on the proposed Polish historic district.
HOLYOKE -- A lawyer for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Springfield said Thursday the City Council Ordinance Committee is treating the Diocese unfairly regarding a proposal for a Polish historic district here.
Councilors replied that the Diocese and others interested in the proposal have had numerous chances to comment and that the Diocese still can submit written testimony if the submission has new information.
The proposed Polish Heritage Historic District calls for designating as historic 21 residential and commercial properties on the southern side of Lyman Street, with the key being the inclusion of the closed Mater Dolorosa Church at Lyman and Maple streets.
The Diocese opposes inclusion of the church because its officials said parishioners here would be unable to afford the cost of maintaining the 114-year-old church up to historic requirements.
Diocese lawyer Stephen E. Spelman objected to the committee's prohibiting him from making a presentation Tuesday (Feb. 10) at City Hall.
Spelman said that during Tuesday's meeting he wanted to respond to: remarks made in the meeting by Historical Commission Chairwoman Olivia Mausel; a 130-page packet of information about the proposed district Mausel submitted to the committee; and comments about historic districts by Robert McCarroll of the Springfield Historical Commission, who addressed the committee at Mausel's request.
"Ms. Mausel and Mr. McCarroll essentially were allowed to give a two-hour, one-sided presentation to the committee. The committee then refused my request that I be allowed to give a similar type of presentation, which would express an alternative viewpoint," Spelman said.
"This refusal by the committee is particularly critical with respect to the supposed economic benefits that come with the creation of an historic district, as it was clear that many of the councilors had questions about the economic impact of historic districts," he said.
Spelman questioned how what Mausel presented could be considered anything other than advocacy, which he said should require the Ordinance Committee to hear another view.
"I don't see why Ms. Mausel gets to provide advocacy information but the Diocese does not," said Spelman, of the Springfield firm Egan, Flanagan and Cohen.
Committee Chairwoman Rebecca Lisi and Vice Chairman Gordon P. Alexander said Mausel was answering questions councilors have raised about the proposal at previous meetings, not making a presentation.
"This was not a public hearing, and the committee members mentioned at (Tuesday's) meeting that we have suspended our rules several times to hear comments and opinions on the matter," Lisi said.
"(Tuesday) Olivia helped provide technical answers to questions that committee members have asked at previous meetings. No 'presentation' was made," she said.
Also, said Alexander, "The Historical Commission is not an interested party but rather the organ of city government tasked with evaluating such issues and proposals."
"The Ordinance Committee declined to hear further presentations by interested parties either for or against. In spite of this, the Ordinance Committee invited Attorney Spelman to submit in written form any new information he wanted the Ordinance Committee to consider," Alexander said.
It would appear to be difficult to argue Mausel is a neutral party on this issue. She has supported establishment of the Polish historic district as its lead spokeswoman because she said marking such a culture signals the significance to the city in general of people who came before.
Mausel has said, for example: "The Polish Heritage Local Historic District is important because it represents the very industrial facet of Holyoke, that the immigrants, the Polish immigrants settled in a particular part of town, and they worked, went to school, went to church, worked in the mills, came home, went to the Kosciuszko Club."
The packet of information Mausel presented to and discussed with councilors included:
--a map of the proposed district;
--a letter from Fairfield Avenue resident Susan Woods about the positive aspects of the city having desigated that street a historic area.
--a letter supporting the proposal from Preservation Massachusetts President James W. Igoe.
--studies about economic benefits of historic districts in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Kansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Philadelphia, Cleveland and other places by the state of Massachusetts and by the private firm PlaceEconomics of Washington, D.C., a real estate and economic development consulting firm.
Spelman said he would submit studies that show inclusion of properties in historic districts produce negative effects that include reduced property values.
--details about the historical significance of the properties that would be included in the proposed district here,.
--a two-page letter supporting the proposed district from 11-year-old Katie Fydenkevez.
Spelman questioned how a letter that appeared to be from an 11-year-old girl on the topic can be considered anything other than advocacy.
--A Sept. 16, 2013 letter to Mausel from Christopher C. Skelly, director of local government programs with the Massachusetts Historical Commission, encouraging the city to establish the Polish historic district.
--copies of state laws governing how cities and towns establish and deal with historic districts.
--A Jan. 12 opinion from Assistant City Solicitor Kara Cunha to Lisi stating that the City Council could vote to amend the proposed ordinance to remove a property from the proposed historic district. The proposed ordinance also could include a procedure to let an owner of property within the district appeal to a third party designated by the regional planning agency, the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, with the understanding the third party's decision would be binding, Cunha said.
--A Feb. 8, 2014 letter from Neal B. Mitchell Jr. of the engineering firm Neal Mitchell Associates of Northbridge to City Council President Kevin A. Jourdain about the stability of the Mater Dolorosa Church steeple and the controversy surrounding that part of the proposed historic district.
--A copy, unsigned, of a two-page affidavit dated June 2012 from Paul Healy, former Holyoke building inspector, stating he never received a copy of an engineering report about the Mater Dolorosa Church steeple. "I do not know why untruthful statements are being made on these issues," the affidavit states.
The Diocese cited instability of the steeple, and a declining total of parishioners, as the reasons for closing Mater Dolorosa Church in 2011.
But there have been dueling engineering assessments of the steeple. Engineering Design Associates Inc. of West Springfield said in a May 2, 2011 report done for the Diocese concluded, "It is only a matter of time before there is either a partial or compete failure of the wood framed steeple structure."
That was disputed by Mitchell's firm, which did a report for free for Friends of Mater Dolorosa. Because of the steeple's "tension cage" structure of timber, bricks and steel rods, Mitchell said in a July 25, 2011 report, "There is no way that this tower will ever fail with this structural combination."
--A Jan. 9 letter addressed "Dear City Councilor" from the Rev. Albert Scherer, pastor of Our Lady of the Cross Parish at 23 Sycamore St. The letter is about how inclusion of Mater Dolorosa Church in a historic district would impose a financial burden and leave the parish unable to sell the church.
Upon closing Mater Dolorosa Church in 2011, the Diocese merged the former Mater Dolorosa Church with the former Holy Cross Church to form Our Lady of the Cross (OLOC) parish.
While the Diocese owns Mater Dolorosa Church, maintenance costs fall to the local parish, Diocese and parish officials have said.
--A Jan. 5 letter from Bishop Mitchell T. Rozanski, leader of the Diocese, to Victor Anop of Chicopee, of the Friends of Mater Dolorosa Church, a vocal proponent of the historic district plan and frequent critic of the Diocese. Rozanski tells Anop in the letter he has refused Anop's request to inspect Mater Dolorosa Church.
--An April 3 letter to the City Council urging a no vote on the proposed historic district signed by the Rev. Robert A. Gentile, pastor of Blessed Sacrament Parish, the Rev. William H. Lunney, pastor of St. Jerome Parish, the Rev. Sean O'Mannion, pastor of Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish and Immaculate Conception Parish and Scherer.
--A Dec. 19, 2013 memo from Monsignor John J. Bonzagni, director of pastoral planning and chairman of the Diocese's real estate advisory board, to Mayor Alex B. Morse, Jourdain and Mausel asking that church properties be removed from the proposed historic district.
During Tuesday's meeting, Ward 5 Councilor Linda L. Vacon said it was unfortunate that the proposal for the Polish historic district has become "a terribly divisive, controversial matter."
Spelman said it was true that councilors have received phone calls from parishioners concerned about the Polish historic district proposal.
"Some councilors appear to be upset that democracy is breaking out," Spelman said.
The Ordinance Committee will do a final review of the Polish historic district proposal Feb. 24, councilors said.
The committee then plans to vote a recommendation on the proposal to the full City Council.
That means the City Council could vote in March whether to approve or reject the proposal that has drawn hundreds of supporters and foes to municipal meetings and sparked nasty verbal exchanges.
The ordinance would designate as historic an area supporters said represents a place of significance as people from Poland came here to work in the mills between the 1890's and the outbreak of World War I in 1914.
Morse has said he supports establishment of the Polish historic district.