Engel's book seeks to explain what socialism would look like in America. He believes capitalism is designed for the benefit of a small segment of society at the expense of anyone not in the elite.
LUDLOW - Michael Engel is a socialist despite the vitriolic reaction that word tends to elicit from conservatives and liberals alike. He thinks it's a solid economic system.
The Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Westfield State College ran for Congress, unsuccessfully, as an independent in 2010, taking on former Democratic U.S. Rep. John W. Olver. The 71-year-old also owned Cherry Picked Books in Easthampton for a few years.
Now he's written and self-published a book, "Socialism for Smart Folks: A Popular Guide for Open Minds," which seeks to explain and defend the system that countries like Cuba and Venezuela claim to follow (although Engel harbors no illusions about how poorly those governments are run).
Engel's book is written in an almost self-depricating conversational tone, describing what socialism "might be" rather than what it is, since it's so difficult even for scholars to agree on a precise definition. But it's crystal clear that he believes capitalism is designed and executed for the benefit of a small segment of upper-class society at the great and direct expense of anyone not in the elite.
He acknowledges, though, that egregious human rights violations have been committed in the name of socialism. Engel has nothing kind to say about North Korea or its infamously brutal Kim Dynasty, or other governments that have used socialism as a weapon. From the book:
It sometimes appears that most socialists are embarrassed to discuss the issue. We can pretend that the Soviet Union was some kind of non-socialist mutant, but just as Christianity has to answer for the Inquisition, or Islam for its extremist factions, we have to deal with the evils committed in our name. ... (W)e have no clearly positive role models to point to, and a whole raft of negative ones.
So far, whenever socialism has been tried on a national scale, the end result has been perverse, Engel argues. He points to the Soviet Union. In a socialist country, the people are responsible for their own well-being as well as the collective good, but this tenet was abused. It led to extreme bureaucracy and, ultimately, autocrat Joseph Stalin seized all private farmland across huge swaths of his empire and starved millions of people.
Stalin was guilty of a wide range of similarly despicable crimes, and so was fellow socialist Mao Zedong of neighboring China.
Engel argues there is a better way to introduce socialism and improve lives. He calls for "democratic planning" of the economy, employee-owned companies, utilities run by local governments, and the like. In this way, socialism is carried out slowly on a scale that limits the risk of a power-hungry ruler seizing the reins and refusing to give them back.
Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, describing himself as a "democratic socialist." Engel's book calls Sanders a "hero for American socialists" along with liberal filmmaker Michael Moore and Martin Luther King, Jr.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)The Associated Press
Sanders' run is part of the reason Engel turned his former blog into a book. In fact, Engel has donated to Sanders' campaign and plans to volunteer for him.
Engel said he supported the Occupy Wall Street movement, but its leaderless structure and overall ineffective strategy ensured it would be short-lived. Changing the economic system of the world's most powerful country, or even just towns, would require a similar yet more effective and bigger push for an overhaul.
"It would be a goal of mine. Can it be done? With difficulty," said Engel in an interview with MassLive. "Should it be done? Yes."
He believes the "productive resources" of the U.S. should be used to benefit everyone, not just private profit-seekers, and he said he's glad Sanders has started a conversation about subjects important to socialists.
What about the welfare state, everyone lining up for their free government stuff? Engel prefers not to use the term "entitlements," opting instead for "rights": The right to education, health care and a job that pays a "livable wage" among them. And these are not handouts. Engel says every citizen would have a responsibility to be productive and participate in this system so it can work properly.
These ideas, no matter their merit, have been used to justify unconscionable abuses of power and the murders of nearly countless human beings. As Engel imagines a socialist system in the United States, he acknowledges individuals may try to seize the opportunity and take over, as the Nazis did around the time his family fled Germany, but he would bet on a successful resistance.
"Americans don't like being bossed around that much," he said.
It sounds like circuitous reasoning: Everyone has to participate in socialism, even though a lot of Americans recoil from hard rules. There is a solution, though, according to Engel. Why not incentives rather than punishments?
For a socialist health care system to become and remain stable, each citizen would need to try to prevent illness and injury. Those who choose not to could be shut out of certain public benefit programs. If the system just simply blocked certain people, we would be facing tyranny.
(On a side note, Engel thinks the Affordable Care Act "sucks" and people still want reasonably-priced health insurance. The debate over that issue, he said, centered on President Barack Obama himself and his arguably overbearing tactics and dealmaking to get the bill through Congress.)
Venezuela's nationwide toilet paper shortage is often cited as an example of socialism in action, although some argue it's the result of numerous other factors. Even the most basic needs of the people can't be met or, if they can, it's by government ration. Those who worry about similar problems in America forget our country's extraordinary wealth, Engel said, and the people would be democratically involved in planning economic activity.
"Living under socialism would be harder than living under capitalism. In capitalism, you can mind your own business," said Engel. "Socialism indicates something different. You can't really mind your business anymore. There's a set of social responsibilities."
The book is not designed to sway people to become socialists. Rather, there is a debate raging on the pages that Engel hopes will continue in conversation among readers. But the bottom line is this: "Socialism is really a transformation of the economy. ... You can't put a smiley face on capitalism. It won't work," he said.
Engel, a self-described civil libertarian, said liberalism also is "not working." Liberals, he believes, consider socialism a dangerous ideology. He said his ideas are more interesting to conservatives even if they only serve to make the blood boil.
"Socialism for Smart Folks," then, is really written for everyone who wants to learn about that system, no matter the reason, and how America might look if we adopted it.
Socialism in the U.S. is not the endgame, though.
"There are some who argue that socialism has to be international or not at all," said Engel, "and I tend to agree."