The commission chose to delay a vote on demolition until it tours the inside of the building and gets further details from the owner on preservation efforts.
SPRINGFIELD - The Springfield Historical Commission was not convinced this week that a blighted historic duplex at 25-27 Elliot St., is beyond saving.
And a lawyer for the property owner, who has applied for permission to demolish the building, said at Thursday's hearing that losing the building is "a sin," but an economic necessity.
"It's a sin," said Glenn Goodman of Springfield, a lawyer representing Long Wharf Financial of Las Vegas, the listed owner. "It's a shame. The only commercially viable option is to demolish it."
The commission voted to table any action on the demolition request until the commission tours the inside of the building, and gets further details on the owner's efforts to save or sell the building. Goodman said he will make the arrangements with the owner.
The building, constructed in 1872, has extensive damage, Goodman said, describing it as "gutted," swept by fire and "just a mess."
It has been boarded and vacant since a fire in 2008, and under Housing Court review since that time.
Some commission members and two residents speaking against the demolition said that estimates provided by the owner that it might cost $1.5 million to $3.5 million to restore the building seem too extravagant or exaggerated.
The $1.5 million estimate appeared to be a "compete restoration to it's grand elegance," and thus inflated beyond what the commission would likely require, commission Chairman Ralph Slate said. The higher estimate of $3 million to $3.5 million was based on vague numbers "and seemed hard to believe on their face,'' he said.
"We would like to explore every option to save it and to make sure it's not just being cleared for convenience," Slate said. "The past proposals are not very detailed."
The cost estimates seem to be old estimates from vague sources, and seem to call for "Cadillac reconstruction," Slate said.
Goodman said he will seek further details and a description of efforts to preserve or sell the site. The property is behind the federal courthouse on State Street and within the Armoury-Quadrangle Local Historic District.
Residents William Devlin and David Gaby urged the commission to reject the demolition request.
Devlin said the building was left unprotected from the weather and other conditions for long periods following a 2008 fire, and has been neglected by successive owners. It is a "nasty idea" to tear it down, he said.
Gaby said he has been inside the building and is convinced that a gut renovation is not needed, as many elements can be preserved. He suggested the cost for restoration is far less than cited.
"It's not the White House," Gaby said. "It's not Independence Hall."
Commission member Robert McCarroll said that having the building demolished would leave the property with little value because any new development there would meet strict requirements within a historic district. The site is small, leaving little room for creating a parking lot if that would be the plan, he said.
Goodman said he did not know if the ownership has offered the site for sale at a very low price, as a means of improving its chances for preservation.
Long Wharf, a mortgage company, reached an agreement to take over the deed to the property from the former owner, in lieu of foreclosure of a $250,000 loan, according to Goodman. Slate questioned the corporate status of Long Wharf, and Goodman said he believes the name is a business name, not a corporate name.