Residents urged the Holyoke City Council to retain the needle exchange program because they said it improves public health by reducing spread of HIV-AIDS and hepatitis C, diseases for which there are no cures.
Watch video
HOLYOKE -- Six residents urged the City Council to support the needle exchange program that is in danger of closing and a seventh asked whether the council would vote for it at City Hall Tuesday.
The interest during the public speak-out part of the City Council meeting was prompted by a Hampden Superior Court judge Monday ordering that Tapestry Health shut down its needle exchange program here within four months because it was improperly established without a City Council vote.
But as part of his ruling, Judge Mark D. Mason also issued a 120-day stay. During the stay, the needle exchange program at 15-A Main St. can continue to operate while the City Council considers the merits of the program, one of only five in the state.
Unless the council votes to approve the program, which looks unlikely, the needle exchange program that has operated here since August 2012 must end when the 120-day order expires.
Holyoke Mayor Alex B. Morse said the city will appeal and file for reconsideration of Mason's decision.
Letting Tapestry's needle exchange program end would make the city less safe, said Tyler Ingraham, of Linden Street.
"If they're not operating, there are more dirty needles on the street, they're not educating people ...," Ingraham said.
"I just ask you to do the right thing ...," he told the council.
Jeffery Anderson-Burgos of Locust Street said access to the clean needles of a program like Tapestry Health's is a way for the community to help people who are part of the community and who happen to be drug addicts (see video above).
"This is about compassion ...," Anderson-Burgos said.
Gabriel Quaglia of Harrison Avenue said he is in recovery, not having partaken of drugs or alcohol since Oct. 1, 2011. Contrary to stereotype, many addicts have jobs and families, and are people everyone interacts with daily, he said.
Some intravenous drug users caught HIV-AIDS and hepatitis C because they didn't have access to a program like Tapestry Health's where they could get a clean needle instead of using one infected by a previous user, he said.
"I'm here because I care about people and I'm here because I know for a fact that Tapestry needle exchange saves lives and improves them," Quaglia said.
In needle exchange, intravenous drug users visit an office and hand over used injection-drug needles and get clean ones in return. Doctors and other specialists say isolating the used needles is vital because the sharing of infected needles is largely to blame for spreading diseases for which there are no cures like HIV-AIDS and hepatitis C.
A related benefit is intravenous drug users in such visits can get exposed to safety warnings and counseling referrals they otherwise might never get, supporters say.
Opponents say that it doesn't make sense to give needles to addicts and trust that they will avoid sharing them, and that doing so spotlights the city as a drug den.
The other cities with needle exchange programs are Northampton, Boston, Cambridge and Provincetown.
Jose Gonzalez of Walnut Street said shutting down the needle exchange program makes no sense. A drug addict's obsession is to take drugs and without a clean supply of needles, that leaves only infected ones, he said.
"This is a humanitarian matter, not a property value matter. It's not a matter of what looks nice. We have a big drug problem here," Gonzalez said.
"They're going to get it, you know, they're going to find a way to inject it. They want it more than food and water and air and love. They're going to get it," he said.
With needle exchange, the availability of clean needles reduces the sharing of infected ones and that stops the spread of deadly diseases, he said.
Tonya Perron of Holy Family Road said that she is a registered nurse and that needle exchange can help in fighting the spread of HIV-AIDS and hepatitis c.
"It saves lives," Perron said.
Elvin Bruno Jr. of Chestnut Street said he has not always been close with his father, who has struggled with drug addiction and now has HIV.
"If he had access to clean needles, he may not have HIV," Bruno said.
In light of Mason's ruling about needle exchange, Barbara Blodgett of Hillside Avenue asked, "What are the chances that the City Council will vote in favor of it ...?"
"To be determined," council President Kevin A. Jourdain said.
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit argued that the key issue was over what defined "local approval." They said, and Mason's ruling supported, that the local approval that is needed to establish a needle exchange program is a favorable vote of the City Council and not just approval of the mayor and Board of Health, as Morse, program supporters and state officials have said.
Not all of the 15 city councilors are plaintiffs in the lawsuit or oppose how the needle exchange program was established. Some have left the board or have asked that they be removed as plaintiffs.
Currently the plaintiffs are councilors Linda L. Vacon, Todd A. McGee, James M. Leahy, Joseph M. McGiverin, Daniel B. Bresnahan and Jourdain.
Defendants in the lawsuit are the Holyoke Board of Health, Tapestry Health and Morse.
The Board of Health first voted 3-0 to establish a needle exchange program with Morse's approval July 9, 2012. But Jourdain filed a complaint that the meeting violated the state Open Meeting Law.
On Aug. 7, 2012, the City Council voted 13-2 to contest the implementation of a needle exchange program and to authorize the council president to retain legal counsel to fight the matter.
Morse vetoed the council's order on the grounds that the City Council president may not retain separate legal counsel on behalf of the City Council. Mason said in his ruling that in filing the lawsuit, the City Council "acted within the lawful exercise of its authority..."
The Board of Health voted 3-0 again on Aug. 14, 2012 to establish a needle exchange program.
The lawsuit was filed Oct. 12, 2012.