The private landfill in the city is expected to close by the end of 2017 or early 2018.
CHICOPEE - A committee studying the effect of the impending closure of the Chicopee Sanitary Landfill on the city is recommending a stepped-up recycling program, a fee to discard bulk waste and an eventual trash fee for families who throw away more than one barrel of trash each week.
A meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on March 29 at the RiverMills Senior Center to discuss the 47-page report with the City Council and the public.
"We will be sharing this information with our municipal leaders and the public so that a comprehensive approach can be taken in the city's best interest," Mayor Richard J. Kos said.
It will be up to Kos and the City Council to adopt any of the recommendations.
The 14-member committee included four city councilors, staff, members of the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission and business leaders. Members have been meeting since early fall to discuss how to handle the closing.
The landfill, owned by the Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal and operated by Waste Management Inc., is due to close at the end of 2017 or early 2018. When it closes, Chicopee will lose about $1,735,000 in benefits, including a $1 million annual payment it receives as the host community and the ability to dump trash at less than half the cost of the market rate.
The committee, funded in part by a District Local Technical Assistance grant that provided about $15,000 in services and expertise of Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, attempted to find ways to make up for the loss of funds and find a way to dispose of trash when the landfill closes.
"To mitigate this financial impact, Chicopee is considering innovative resource management technologies that will result in solid waste reductions, an increase in recycling and operational efficiencies," the report said.
By integrating a variety of ideas including increasing recycling, automating trash collection and adding fees the city would save an estimated $970,000 and earn $325,000. The combination would generate about $1,295,000 — about $500,000 short of the loss the city would see when the landfill closes, the report said.
The committee called for an intensive educational program that would help increase recycling and therefore reduce the amount of trash that the city has to find a way to dispose. If that happens, the gap could be closed more, said Stanley Kulig, retired Department of Public Works superintendent who served as one of the chairmen on the committee.
"Our number one recommendation was public education we have to start changing the mindset of people," Kulig said.
The goals include having the City Council adopt a zero waste policy by April that would call for the city to produce almost no waste in the future.
It also recommended instituting a bulk waste fee in July of this year that could generate about $50,000 in revenue. The fee amount was not recommended but the report said other communities charge between $5 and $20 per item depending on the item.
Probably the most controversial proposal is to create a "pay as you throw" system. Currently, residents can leave an unlimited amount of trash on the curb to be collected at no cost beyond what they pay in taxes.
Under the committee's recommendation, all residential properties would receive one free 35-gallon barrel that would be picked up once a week. If a household fills more than that, it will have to pay a fee to dispose of the extra bags or barrels of trash, the report said.
The committee knew there was little interest in creating an across-the-board trash fee, but Kulig described the proposal as a hybrid program that will encourage recycling.
"If they chose not to recycle and all their trash does not fit in one container, they will have to pay for overflow," Kulig said. "If you recycle the way you can and divert what you can you easily should fit your trash in a smaller container."
In 2013 the city enhanced its recycling program. All residents have a city-provided 95-gallon recycling barrel on wheels and they can mix all recyclables in the same container. That program is not expected to change, Kulig said.
Some large families may have to pay extra and people may have to pay for an occasional extra bag, but most people should not have to pay a trash fee, he said.
Studies show a "pay as you go" system reduces residential trash by 35 to 50 percent and would eventually save the city about $225,000 in tipping fees. Estimates show the plan would also generate about $250,000 in revenue from the fees.
The report did not include the initial costs of purchasing the barrels, but said the city could apply for a one-time $150,000 state Department of Environmental Protection agency grant.
Other proposals from the committee include automating curbside collection so the trash barrels would be dumped into a trash truck by a mechanical arm. That system would reduce the number of employees from the current 31 to about 20 over several years, the report said.
The committee also discussed creating compost programs. It recommended a push for more backyard composting for residents who could do it, as well as eventually trying to implement a curbside composting collection for food scraps and other organic waste.
Currently three communities have a curbside food waste program and five more are piloting such programs now. All eight are in the eastern part of the state.
"That would take a big tonnage out of the solid waste stream," Kulig said. "A lot of what is left is organics."
But starting a curbside collection of organics would also be labor intensive and would require an investment in vehicles and other equipment, he said.
"There are pluses and minuses to it," Kulig said.
The committee also recommended the Department of Public Works start picking up trash at the Doverbook Condominiums and do a study to see if it can absorb more of the trash collection at the other 23 complexes.
About 10 years ago the city agreed to collect the waste from condominiums at no charge. Because it could not quickly implement the collection using city staff, it contracted the job to private haulers, Kulig said.
The city already picks up recycling at the Doverbrook Condominums so it could easily use existing staff to also pick up the waste. Doing so would save about $78,000 a year, Kulig said.
While the goal will be to generate less waste, the committee agreed to further research the lowest cost ways to dump refuse. One possibility is to join an existing consortium of local communities that join together to get the lowest price, he said.