Cara Rintala is accused in the strangulation death of her wife, Annamarie Cochrane Rintala, in 2010 in Granby.
Update 4:10 p.m.: The jury has gone home without a verdict Thursday in the third full day of deliberations in the trial.
NORTHAMPTON -- Jurors in the third murder trial for Cara Rintala, accused of killing her wife in 2010 in Granby, are in their third full day of deliberations.
So far the jury has had no questions for the judge and has not sent any notes out of the jury room.
In Rintala's last two trials, jurors first declared they were deadlocked on the third full day of deliberations. Both trials, in 2013 and 2014, ended in mistrials.
Rintala, 49, is accused in connection with the strangulation death of Annmarie Cochrane Rintala on March 29, 2010, at the couple's Granby home.
It's hard to compare exactly the length of deliberations at each trial. In the first trial the jury got the case at 4 p.m. on a Thursday, almost the end of the court day.
In the second trial jurors also got the case at about 4 p.m., this time on a Tuesday, and so had almost no deliberation time that day.
In this trial jurors began deliberations first thing Tuesday morning.
In the first trial, jurors sent a note to Hampshire Superior Court Judge Mary-Lou Rup near the end of the third full day of deliberations asking her to redefine "reasonable doubt" and give them guidance on how to reach a consensus.
Rup gave them a standard instruction at the start of the fourth full day, which essentially asked them to try harder. The jury sent a note to the judge at about 2 p.m. that day saying they were deadlocked. The judge declared at mistrial at 3 p.m. that day.
In the second trial, jurors first reported to Rup they were deadlocked at 3:30 p.m. on the third full day of deliberations, a Friday.
The next trial day, Rup read a standard instruction, in essence asking jurors to try harder. At about noon, they sent word asking her to define "reasonable doubt" and "moral certitude" and she repeated the instruction on reasonable doubt.
The jury reported back the next morning they were deadlocked and didn't see any change in the future, so Rup declared a mistrial about 10:30 a.m.
There were no questions from jurors in the first two trials until they reported they were deadlocked.
Rintala has been free on $150,000 bail since March 2014.
The jury has over 200 exhibits in the room with them, which they can opt to review or not to review. Among those are 10 video and audio recordings they can choose to watch or listen to in the jury room.
Among those videos are interviews Massachusetts State Police Trooper Robin Whitney conducted with Rintala, one of which lasted 21/2 hours.
Jurors will decide whether to acquit Rintala or to convict her of first- or second-degree murder or voluntary manslaughter. At previous trials, jurors were only instructed to consider the murder charge.
The defense contends Rintala was not at home at the time of Cochrane Rintala's death. The prosecution says Rintala killed her wife, then took the couple's 2-year-old daughter out on errands where she would be seen on video surveillance to create an alibi. After she got home, according to the prosecution, Rintala poured paint over the crime scene to contaminate it.
The prosecution is asking for a first-degree murder conviction under two of the three theories that can sustain that conviction. One is premeditation and the other is extreme atrocity and cruelty.
The jury, if it decides to convict on first-degree murder, must indicate on the verdict slip if it found one or both theories applicable. Jurors only need to find one theory applicable in order to convict.
The manslaughter instruction from the judge discussed killing in the "heat of passion."