The committee is supposed to evaluate the job performance of Superintendent Richard W. Rege Jr. in May, but put off the job so it could review the form it has been using since he was hired as superintendent in 2005.
CHICOPEE – After making small changes to its evaluation form, the School Committee will begin the process to grade the superintendent.
The committee is supposed to evaluate the job performance of Superintendent Richard W. Rege Jr. in May, but put off the job so it could review the form it has been using since he was hired as superintendent in 2005.
About mid-way through the process, the subcommittee working on the evaluation learned the Massachusetts Association of School Committees, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Superintendents Association are developing a form that all communities can tailor to their needs. Because of that, the group did not make many changes to the existing form, said committee member Michael J. Pise who has been working on the evaluation form.
One of the complaints has been the evaluation is too long and the 56 questions can sometimes be repetitive. The committee also removed one question about the health of the superintendent which seemed irrelevant, Pise said.
“Some of the questions tend to repeat themselves .¦.¦. But we all see him and work with him in different ways,” committee member David G. Barsalou said, explaining why similar questions were not removed.
School Committees rank the superintendent on a scale of one to five for each question, with one being unacceptable and a 5 being outstanding. In most years, Rege has received an score averaging about 4.
The biggest controversy was about a category of “no basis to evaluate,” added after members complained there are some questions they skip because they do not have enough information to answer them.
Committee member Adam D. Lamontagne said he feels members should research the question if they do not have an answer and added he has called school staff in the past for more information.
“I feel it is our obligation to answer each and every question. That is just my opinion,” he said.
Member John F. Mruk disagreed and cited a couple of examples where he would have difficulty in making a judgment including one about Rege’s ability to making decisions with the advice of lawyers and other appropriate staff, and another that asks if he presents a positive image of the school by participating in community events.
The evaluation form was approved in a 10-1 vote.
Committee Vice Chairwoman Marjorie A. Wojcik, who oversees the tallying of the forms, asked members to start filling them out. She said she will collect them in about two weeks and after that a meeting will be scheduled in September for discussion about the evaluation. Typically a wage increase is also tied to the results.