The Senate will resume debate on the casino bill on Tuesday.
BOSTON -- State senators on Tuesday approved a measure to bar state legislators from taking a job with a casino until one year after they leave office, capping a skirmish that became so heated that the Senate president temporarily moved it out of public sight.
The measure was among 22 additional amendments approved or rejected during the state Senate's second day of debate on a bill to authorize three casino resorts in the state including one for anywhere in the four counties of Western Massachusetts and one slot-machine parlor. Senators have now completed 82 of the 182 amendments submitted for the casino debate. The Senate will break for Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, which starts at sunset on Wednesday, and resume debate on the casino bill on Tuesday.
The state House of Representatives approved a casino bill on Sept. 14. If the Senate approves a bill, the two branches will negotiate a final compromise bill and vote again before sending the compromise bill to Gov. Deval L. Patrick.
Senators also defeated an amendment to allow slot machines at Logan International Airport in Boston. They also killed a proposal to include casino revenues in the calculation when state officials determine if rising state revenues would trigger a small cut in the state income tax.
Senate President Therese Murray
Soon after it began on Tuesday, the debate halted when one state senator argued for an amendment for a five-year "cooling off period" for former legislators before they work for a casino or applicant for a gambling license. Opponents became testy and Senate President Therese Murray gaveled the debate to a close. She ordered Democrats behind closed doors for a caucus that lasted an hour. When they emerged, senators quickly voted 36-1 for the one-year period for former lawmakers.
Murray defended her decision, saying there was a very healthy debate on the floor before going into caucus. “I didn't cut off the debate,” Murray said after the session when a reporter asked why she cut off debate. “I asked the members to come into the caucus so they could have an instructional, informative debate on both sides and what the concerns were from some of the members.”
Two Western Massachusetts Democratic senators – Sens. Stephen M. Brewer of Barre and Gale D. Candaras of Wilbraham – said they resented the amendment by casino foe Sen. James B. Eldridge that called for a five-year cooling off period for former legislators before they could win a job at a casino or an applicant for a gambling license.
“We don't get rich doing this and we do the people’s business with honor,” said Brewer, chairman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee and key author of the casino bill.
The Republican file photoSen. Gale Candaras of Wilbraham
Candaras said that Eldridge’s opposition to casinos turned into “an attack” on his fellow legislators. She questioned if legislators would be similarly blocked from working in the green energy, health care or movies since they approved laws that affect those industries.
“I take exception to the idea we can't work in the private sector any more,” Candaras said.
After the caucus, Eldridge, a Democrat from Acton, agreed to change his amendment to one year, saying it is an improvement to the bill.
Eldridge said the one-year waiting period appears reasonable because existing state law bans former legislators from becoming a lobbyist until one year after they leave office.
“This is an economic development bill for the people and should not be an economic development bill for legislators,” Eldridge said. “This is an important public integrity measure. We need to make sure this is not a bill that benefits any of us personally."
Senators also voted 32-6 to defeat a Republican amendment to include casino revenues when determining a possible incremental cut in the state income tax.
Sen. Michael R. Knapik, a Republican from Westfield, said the amendment would provide that some casino revenues help in tax relief. Knapik joked about current plans for spending tax dollars from casinos on an array of programs, saying a chart of the proposed expenditures looks like “the family tree of the gentleman from Barre,” referring to Brewer.
In 2002, legislators froze the state income tax at 5.3 percent as part of a law to help close a deficit in the state budget. At the same time, legislators established a schedule for the income tax to gradually be lowered to 5 percent in annual increments of 0.05 percentage points.
The tiny cuts would only be triggered if there was enough economic growth each year. If the income tax does drop by 0.05 percent in January as legislators expect, it will be the first cut in the tax since it fell to 5.3 percent on Jan. 1, 2002 under a ballot question approved in 2000.
Brewer said the bill calls for reasonable spending of casino tax revenues. Under the bill, gross gaming revenues from a casino resort would be taxed at 25 percent and the slot parlor, 40 percent, and could eventually raise about $450 million a year, according to Brewer. The bill directs different percentages of the tax bounty to programs such as local aid, mitigation for casino host and surrounding communities, transportation, tourism, education and economic development.
Senators also voted 18-1 to reject an amendment by Sen. Marc R. Pacheco, a Taunton Democrat, to allow slot machines at Logan airport. Pacheco called the proposal “common sense,” saying the machines would capture revenues from nearly 30 million people expected to fly out of the airport next year, with 60 percent from places other than Massachusetts.
A state senator from Boston dismissed the idea. “This is probably not a real good idea to put slot machines in Logan Airport for a whole host of reasons I don't need to bore you with,” said Sen. Anthony W. Petruccelli.