Sen. Robert Hedlund, a Weymouth Republican, sponsored an amendment to the expanded gambling legislation that would allow bars and restaurants to offer free or discounted drinks if casinos were also allowed to.
By MATT MURPHY
and MICHAEL NORTON
BOSTON -Neither the governor nor the mayor of Boston on Monday wanted to wade into the debate over allowing bars and restaurants to offer free or discounted alcoholic drinks in the same manner casinos would be allowed to under advancing legislation.
“I’m waiting for the legislation to be finalized. That’s an amendment to the legislation that was offered by a Republican senator and they do that in all the other casinos in the world. Let’s see what the final legislation does. It’s a proposal. It’s not a fact of life yet,” Mayor Thomas Menino told reporters after attending a groundbreaking event on a new affordable housing project in Chinatown.
Sen. Robert Hedlund, a Weymouth Republican, sponsored an amendment to the expanded gambling legislation that passed the Senate last Thursday that would allow bars and restaurants to offer free or discounted drinks if casinos were also allowed to, an idea one senator described as “policy mitigation.”
The amendment passed the Senate 25-13 with bipartisan support.
With the issue of lifting the 1984 ban on “happy hour” now poised to become part of conference committee negotiations between the House and Senate, Gov. Deval L. Patrick also declined to take a position on the controversial measure.
“Let me read the whole thing and then I’ll give you a point of view,” Patrick said. Both he and Menino support legalizing casinos in Massachusetts.
The impact on businesses of all kinds has been a running theme in the long debate over casinos. Bills approved by the House and Senate do not specify where casinos will be built, but authorize resort casinos in three regions of the state and one slot machine gambling license awarded through a bidding process.
Supporters of the amendment said the legislation keeps the playing field level for bars and restaurants competing with casinos.
While no senators spoke against Hedlund’s amendment, Sen. Susan Fargo, D-Lincoln, said another amendment banning free alcohol at casinos, which failed, had important public safety implications. Hedlund also supported the ban on free drinks.
“I am concerned that in this bill on several occasions we are carving out exemptions and special treatment for casinos at the expense of our other established businesses, bars and restaurants,” said Fargo.
Fargo said areas around the two Connecticut casinos that feature free alcoholic beverage have experienced “a large increase” in motor vehicle accidents and fatalities. Noting that rising accident rates led to the original “Happy Hour” ban, she predicted motor vehicle accidents around Massachusetts casinos would rise too.
Sen. Anthony Petruccelli, D-East Boston, said complimentary beverages under the bill would only be offered to patrons at a casino gaming station. “In no way shape or form is it at one of the restaurants in the facility,” Petruccilli said during floor debate last week, saying complimentary drinks are a competitive issue within the casino industry.
Public Safety Committee Co-chairman Rep. James Timilty, D-Walpole, addressing Hedlund’s amendment last week, said “the civil libertarian in me” prompted him to want to let the private sector and hospitality industry set their drink pricing. Timilty said deeply discounted drinks are permitted now, but must be run for a week. He said Massachusetts casinos must be competitive with Connecticut casinos.
Timilty said repeat drunk driving has been reduced by Melanie’s Law, which targeted habitual offenders, and interlock devices are also a weapon against repeat offenders. He also noted responsibilities already on business owners, saying, “It’s illegal right now to over-serve somebody.”
Sen. Stephen Brewer said the amendment would ensure “fairness” between casinos and Main Street restaurants, and said the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission maintained its regulatory power under the Hedlund amendment. “They are in charge of making sure that we’re not going to have 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week happy hour,” Brewer said.
The House and Senate have not yet named members to the six-person conference committee that will work to finalize expanded gaming legislation.