A local eye surgeon, a university attorney and a "lifelong Republican" voter said their signatures were among those forged on Hampden Register of Deeds candidate Cheryl Coakley-Rivera's nomination papers, prompting Republican opponent Marie Angelides to file a complaint with the secretary of state.
Curious blocks of apparently identical handwriting, botched street addresses and fumbled party affiliations.
These are among the factors that prompted Cheryl Coakley-Rivera's Republican opponent for Hampden County register of deeds to file a complaint with the state less than two weeks ahead of the election.
A spokeswoman for Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin's office confirmed they received a complaint from Longmeadow attorney Marie Angelides earlier this week, but noted the deadline to challenge signatures has long passed.
"That window closed months and months ago. We are now counting ballots. If the candidate is alleging violations of elections law, we are not an enforcement agency and will refer the matter to the correct one, such as the district attorney's office or attorney general," Galvin spokeswoman Debra O'Malley said.
Candidates in races like the register of deeds are required to submit at least 1,000 signatures for certification in order to appear on the ballot. The deadline was May 29.
Nominations may be challenged within three days of that deadline, according to Galvin's office. In this case, the window for challenges closed after June 1.
Early voting began this week. Election Day is Nov. 6.
During an interview Wednesday, Angelides said she understands she conceded her right to challenge the validity of signatures, but believes the identical blocks of voter names on Coakley-Rivera's nomination papers are troubling nonetheless.
"I know that legally I cannot challenge the signatures at this time but I think it's a matter of ethics and transparency. I think it's important for voters to know that this occurred," Angelides said.
State law requires that a voter must sign his or her own signature to be certified as a supporter in the commonwealth's eyes, unless a voter is disabled and requires a proxy. Street addresses and party affiliations must match.
For example, registered Republicans cannot submit signatures for a Democratic candidate and vice versa. If there is a name on a submission that does not exactly match an address, it should not be certified.
In addition to Angelides, individual voters cried foul during interviews with The Republican.
Dr. Andrew Lam, a retinal surgeon from Longmeadow, said he was unsettled to see that his name appeared on Coakley-Rivera's nomination papers.
"First of all, it's a printed name, not even a signature. I absolutely didn't sign that. In fact, my address was written incorrectly," Lam said.
"On the sheet that I saw it looked like someone just looked at a voter address list and wrote out a series of names in the same handwriting, which is illegal, I'm sure. You can't just forge a bunch of signatures to get on a ballot and run for office," he added.
Printed on each signature sheet is a warning that reads: "Criminal penalty for unlawfully signing, altering, defacing, mutilating, destroying or suppressing this petition: fine of up to $1,000 or imprisonment for up to a year."
Coakley-Rivera, a former state representative in Springfield, easily knocked out write-in candidate Donald Ashe Jr. in the September Democratic primary, 27,151-954.
Ashe is the eldest son of Donald Ashe Sr., who was register of deeds for 34 years and died of cancer amid a run for his seventh term.
For her part, Coakley-Rivera denounced the controversy over her signature sheets.
"This is nothing more than a political stunt less than two weeks before the election in a desperate attempt to smear my reputation," Coakley-Rivera said in response to a request for comment for this story.
"I was fortunate enough to have had hundreds of people gathering signatures. Thousands of signatures were turned in on my behalf. The Secretary of State certified well over the required number of signatures. The residents of Hampden County deserve better," she said.
A spokeswoman for Galvin's office said Coakley-Rivera had 1,519 signatures certified by local clerks' offices and the state.
The Republican reviewed a sampling of the nomination sheets from various cities and towns. While many appear legitimate, there were glaring examples of signature sheets with apparently identical penmanship nearly all the way down in multiple communities.
"Whoever did this is awfully stupid," Longmeadow resident Maureen Beattie told The Republican. "They wrote down my address wrong and I never signed anything like that."
Beattie said she wracked her memory to recall whether someone knocked on her door or caught her outside the grocery store during a signature push, but concluded she would not have signed.
"I'm a lifelong Republican. I definitely would have asked whether the candidate was a Democrat and I never would have signed it," Beattie said.
In addition to Lam and Beattie -- Cheryl Smith, general counsel for Western New England University, said both she and her husband were surprised to see their names included on a Longmeadow certification sheet for Coakley-Rivera dated April 12.
"Those are not our signatures and that's not our address. We never signed that," Smith said during an interview this week. "And I've known both candidates for probably a quarter-century and hold them both in high regard, so this sort of took me by surprise."
Neither Lam's nor Beattie's nor the Smiths' names were certified -- but they were submitted for consideration, the records show.
On a signature sheet filed in West Springfield on April 20, there is a cluster of seven Daggett family members submitted in two different handwriting styles. Based on a public records comparison, at least two of the voters' first names were misspelled on the signature sheet (Carolyn and Deanna Daggett spelled Caroline and Denna, respectively).
Political operative Frank Keough of Springfield, whom Coakley-Rivera has said is central to her campaign, is married to Sharon Keough, nee Daggett. Her brother is Olympic gymnastics gold medalist Timothy Daggett.
All seven Daggett signatures were certified.
Frank Keough has remained a potent figure in local politics despite spending three years in federal prison for fleecing a taxpayer-funded homeless shelter he once ran in Springfield.
Earlier in Coakley-Rivera's campaign, state Trial Court officials launched an inquiry into whether Coakley-Rivera was improperly politicking in the Hampden Superior Court Clerk's office, where she is an assistant. An auditor came up empty, but courthouse employees privately groused about Keough's frequent presence in the office -- where he is not employed -- during an election cycle.
When asked about the standards to certify signatures on nomination papers, Springfield Elections Commissioner Gladys Oyola said she and her staff are tasked solely with cross-checking voters' names and addresses and ensuring they are registered to vote and belong to the appropriate political party.
"Secretary Galvin's office tells us specifically that we are not handwriting experts or suddenly become all 'Columbo' when we're certifying signatures," Oyola said.
Angelides said the questionable signatures are particularly troubling to her in this race.
"It's occurred in a race for register of deeds -- a seat where valid signatures are crucial to the job," she said. "Since this issue appears to have cropped up across municipal lines, the question is whether it's campaign-driven. I consider it a form of voter fraud."
Angelides, an immigration attorney and member of the Longmeadow Select Board, has run for regional office twice before, in 2010 and 2012, and was defeated both times by state Rep. Brian Ashe.