Quantcast
Channel: News
Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live

Elizabeth Warren to appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

$
0
0

U.S. Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren will be appearing on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Tuesday evening, a Warren staff member confirmed Tuesday afternoon.

elizabeth warren daily showElizabeth Warren is pictured during an April 2011 appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart where she spoke out against Congressional efforts to weaken the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Photo courtesy of TheDailyShow.com)

NEW YORK, N.Y. - U.S. Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren will be appearing on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Tuesday evening, her campaign confirmed Tuesday afternoon.

Warren, who is emerging as the Democratic lead in the effort to unseat Republican Sen. Scott Brown in the Senate race in Massachusetts, has appeared on The Daily Show several times, typically speaking about financial issues in relation to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

During her most recent appearance on the Comedy Central show in April 2011, she spoke out against attempts by Republicans in Congress to weaken the agency.

"This consumer agency is a tangible and concrete down payment on the notion that we can build something that's fair and we can actually give middle class families a chance to survive economically and maybe even to prosper," Warren told Stewart in April. "Right now there are bills pending in both the House and Senate to kill the agency outright before it's ever able to take one step on behalf of middle class families."

Her April 26, 2011 appearance can be seen below, courtesy of Comedy Central.

The Harvard Law School professor also appeared on The Daily Show in 2009 and in 2010 to discuss the financial crisis and the Troubled Asset Relief Program.


Additional information will be published on MassLive as it becomes available.


4 more jurors chosen for David Oppenheim trial

$
0
0

Judge Mary-Lou Rup intends to seat 16 jurors, a panel that will include 4 alternates, for the trial, which is expected to last 2 weeks.

120210 david oppenheim.JPGDavid Oppenheim

NORTHAMPTON – David Fried Oppenheim is more than half way to securing a jury for his child rape trail, as the court sat another four jurors Tuesday.

On Monday, five people in a jury pool of 65 were chosen. About an equal number appeared in Hampshire Superior Court on Tuesday.

Judge Mary-Lou Rup intends to seat 16 jurors, a panel that will include four alternates, for the trial, which is expected to last two weeks.

Oppenheim, 38, the founder of the Pioneer Arts Center of Easthampton, is charged with four counts of child rape for allegedly having sex with a 14-year-old girl who performed in a musical at the center. Jury selection will continue on Wednesday.

State of the Union poll: Is the U.S. in better shape than it was last year?

$
0
0

Did the country realize the progress the president said we were poised for at the beginning of 2011?


What is the state of our Union?

In his second State of the Union address, delivered Jan. 25, 2011, president Barack Obama offered the following hope for the year ahead:

We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.

But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone. We measure progress by the success of our people. By the jobs they can find and the quality of life those jobs offer. By the prospects of a small business owner who dreams of turning a good idea into a thriving enterprise. By the opportunities for a better life that we pass on to our children.
What do you think -- did the country indeed realize the progress the president said we were poised for at the beginning of 2011? Vote in the poll above, and explain your choice in the comments.

Your thoughts: What should Obama say tonight?

It's time to play presidential speech writer. What should Obama say in his address tonight? What issues deserve the most attention? What plans or goals would you lay out for the country if you were writing the speech?

Sound off in the comments section.


Wilbraham selectmen appoint Senior Center Building Needs Study Committee

$
0
0

Selectmen Chairman Patrick J. Brady said it could take years for the study committee to do its work.

102404_scantic_valley_ymca.jpgThe Wilbraham Senior Center occupies 4,000 square feet of space in the Scantic Valley YMCA building.

WILBRAHAM – The Board of Selectmen on Monday appointed an 11-member Senior Center Building Needs Study Committee to study the need for a new senior center.

Before appointing the committee, Selectmen Chairman Patrick J. Brady said, “This is a marathon, not a sprint.” He said it could take years for the study committee to do its work.

Trant Campbell, head of the Council on Aging, said a needs study committee is a first step. Campbell said he envisioned the committee would take six to eight months to do its work.

“Maybe the committee will find that there is no need for a larger senior center,” he said.

If the committee determines there is a need for a larger senior center, then a feasibility committee could be appointed to determine such things as design, location and how to pay for the project, Campbell said.

“That’s when you say we don’t have the money,” Campbell told Brady.

“I think he (Brady) just did,” Thompson said.

Following the appointment of a feasibility committee, a building committee could be appointed to oversee construction of a facility, Campbell said.

The following residents were appointed to serve on the Senior Center Needs Study Committee at Monday night’s selectmen’s meeting: Dennis Lopata, Father Joseph Sorrano of St. Cecilia’s Church, Daniel Fitzgerald, Charles Bennett, Wayne Phaneuf, Betsy Johnsen, Roger Fontaine, William Garvey, Norma Bandarra, Trant Campbell and Paula Dubord, director of elder affairs for the town.

The Friends of the Wilbraham Seniors has been fund-raising for a new senior center for the past few years.

To date, about $90,000 has been raised, Dubord said, with a $10,000 contribution from Health New England and a $25,000 donation from Monson Savings Bank.

To build a new senior center, land would have to be found, a building committee appointed by the selectmen and money appropriated through a town meeting for construction.

Dubord said the number of people in town over age 60 is expected to grow in the next 10 years to more than 40 percent of the town’s population.

The current senior center is part of the Scantic Valley YMCA building. Dubord said the 4,000-square-foot center is not large enough for all the exercise classes, recreational games such as bingo, meals programs and medical appointments that are offered at the senior center.

Most communities the size of Wilbraham have much larger senior centers, she said.

FBI arrests 4 cops in troubled Connecticut suburb, alleging assaults on illegal immigrants

$
0
0

Federal indictment: East Haven officers assaulted individuals while they were handcuffed, unlawfully searched Latino businesses and harassed and intimidated individuals.

By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN

012412 east haven cops fbi arrests.jpgU.S. Attorney David B. Fein, left, speaks about an indictment charging four East Haven police officers with federal civil rights offenses during a press conference in Bridgeport, Conn. on Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. Sgt. John Miller and Officers David Cari, Dennis Spaulding and Jason Zullo are accused of harassing and intimidating Latino residents in East Haven, including their advocates, witnesses and other officers who tried to investigate or report misconduct. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Ned Gerard)

EAST HAVEN, Conn. – Four police officers, including the president of the local police union, were arrested Tuesday by the FBI on charges that they assaulted illegal immigrants and covered up abuses in a New Haven suburb where a federal investigation found life was made miserable for Hispanics.

The East Haven officers assaulted individuals while they were handcuffed, unlawfully searched Latino businesses, and harassed and intimidated individuals, including advocates, witnesses and other officers who tried to investigate or report misconduct or abuse the officers committed, according to the federal indictment.

Federal authorities began investigating police in 2009 in East Haven, where the federal probe last month documented a pattern of abuse. The Hispanic population had doubled in the past decade to more than 10 percent of the seaside city's 28,000 people, but Latino business owners said rough treatment by police drove away many newcomers from Mexico and Ecuador.

The arrests were welcomed by Hispanic business owners in East Haven, including Luis Rodriguez, an immigrant from Ecuador who had complained of harassment by police at his Los Amigos Grocery store.

"They should have to pay, not with many years, but enough to make an example of them. They should not abuse their power," Rodriguez said. "All I ever wanted was to be left in peace."

Officers Dennis Spaulding, David Cari and Jason Zullo and Sgt. John Miller, president of the police union, are charged with conspiracy, deprivation of rights and obstruction of justice.

Federal officials say the officers denied Latino residents and their advocates the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, the right to not be arrested and detained without probable cause and the right to not be arrested on false and misleading evidence.

"In simple terms, these defendants behaved like bullies with badges," said Janice Fedarcyk, assistant director of the New York office of the FBI.

Zullo allegedly described taking joy in singling out Latinos, telling Spaulding in a 2008 exchange quoted by the indictment that he liked harassing drivers and referred to "persons who have drifted to this country on rafts made of chicken wings and are now residing" in East Haven.

102210 east haven police cars.jpgEast Haven police vehicles are seen outside the police department in East Haven, Conn. The FBI on Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012, arrested four East Haven police officers on conspiracy and obstruction of justice charges following an investigation into possible civil rights violations. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill, File)

Miller repeatedly slapped a man handcuffed in his car, while Spaulding threw a man to the ground and repeatedly kicked him while he was handcuffed, according to the indictment. Mayor Joseph Maturo said the four men were arrested around 6 a.m. Tuesday at their homes and at the police department.

Donald Cretella, Miller's lawyer, said his client has been honored with awards and risked his life in shootouts.

"John Miller is a hero in East Haven," he said. "He's decorated. He's a wonderful family man. Hopefully, we'll clear his name."

Frank Riccio Jr., Spaulding's attorney, said his client is an exemplary police officer.

"At this early stage it's our position Mr. Spaulding is not guilty of the charges. He's been nothing but an exemplary police officer. That's why this is shocking."

It wasn't immediately clear who was representing Cari and Zullo.

The indictment says Miller reported to a police department leader described as a co-conspirator who blocked efforts by the police commission to investigate Miller's misconduct. That refers to Chief Leonard Gallo, according to his attorney, Jon Einhorn, who denied that Gallo blocked the investigation.

"It's unfair that he is mentioned in this regard when he isn't even indicted," Einhorn said.

The indictment also accuses unnamed union leaders of intimidation and interference to protect the officers, including a depiction of a rat posted on a bulletin board and a cartoon saying "You know what we do with snitches?" in a police locker room.

The U.S. attorney for Connecticut, David Fein, said the investigation is still looking into other incidents and individuals. Officials said no more arrests were expected Tuesday.

Maturo, a Republican who took office Nov. 19, recently reinstated Gallo as police chief. Gallo had been on paid administrative leave since federal authorities began investigating in 2010. Maturo said he backs the police.

"I stand behind the police department," he said. "We have a great police department."

The U.S. Department of Justice, which has pledged to reach out to the police department to work on reforms, said last month that the department engaged in a pattern of discrimination against Latino residents. Investigators said their probe was complicated by efforts to interfere with witnesses and by police silence.

Nearly half or a third of the drivers pulled over by certain officers were Latino, and the number of Latinos pulled over by certain squads was "extraordinarily high," said Roy Austin Jr., deputy assistant attorney general for the civil rights division. Latinos who were stopped for minor violations were subjected to harsher punishments, such as arrest or vehicle towing, than were non-Latinos.

The East Haven Police Department of some 50 officers has come under scrutiny previously for civil rights issues. A federal jury ruled in 2003 that a white officer used excessive force and violated the rights of a black man he fatally shot after a chase.

Some officers involved in that case kept their jobs and were promoted, and there was no evidence that anyone received training to prevent similar confrontations in the future, Austin said.

Associated Press writer Michael Melia in Hartford contributed to this report.

State of the Union preview: Barack Obama pledging economic revival that will work for everyone

$
0
0

In excerpts of the State of the Union released in advance of the speech, Obama declared that "the defining issue of our time" is the endangered promise of the American dream.

By BEN FELLER | AP White House Correspondent

012412 barack obama.JPGOn the day of his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama walks from the Oval Office along the Colonnade of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is pledging an economic revival that will work for everyone and not just the rich, declaring that "the defining issue of our time" is the endangered promise of the American dream. He's using his State of the Union address Tuesday night to draw a battle line with Republicans over how to avoid a nation of haves and have-nots.

In excerpts of his speech released in advance, Obama attacked income inequality and offered an economic agenda built upon boosting manufacturing, energy and education. He will call for requiring the rich to pay more in taxes and try to appeal to the independent voters and frustrated masses whose support he needs to keep his job.

Obama was making his pitch to a bitterly divided Congress and to a country underwhelmed by his handling of the economy. Targeting anxiety about a slumping middle class, Obama was underlining every proposal with the idea that hard work and responsibility still count.

"No debate is more important," Obama said in the excerpts released by the White House ahead of the 9 p.m. EST speech.

"We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share and everyone plays by the same set of rules," the president said.

He warned Republicans in Congress that he will fight them if they try to obstruct him or restore an economy gutted by "outsourcing, bad debt and phony financial profits."

Republicans weren't impressed.

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, offering the formal GOP response, called Obama's policies "pro-poverty" and his tactics divisive.

"No feature of the Obama presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others," Daniels said in excerpts released before the address.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking ahead of the president's speech, said: "It's hard not to feel a sense of disappointment even before tonight's speech is delivered. The goal isn't to conquer the nation's problems. It's to conquer Republicans. The goal isn't to prevent gridlock, but to guarantee it."

Steeped in American tradition, the State of the Union has become a night of political theater watched by tens of millions of Americans. And this year, the one time when Obama is delivering the address while also campaigning for re-election, the speech amounts to his biggest, best case to spell out his vision for another four years.

The economy dominates.

For an incumbent on the attack about income inequality, the timing could not be better.

Ahead of Obama's speech, Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney released his tax returns under political pressure, revealing that he earned nearly $22 million in 2010 and paid an effective tax rate of about 14 percent. That's a lower rate than many Americans pay because of the way investment income is taxed.

Obama, though, has his own considerable messaging challenges three years into his term.

The economy is improving, but unemployment still stands at the high rate of 8.5 percent. More than 13 million people are out of work. Government debt stands at $15.2 trillion, a record, and up from $10.6 trillion when he took office. Most Americans think the country is on the wrong track.

Obama's relations with Republicans in Congress are poor, casting huge doubt on any of his major ideas for the rest of this year. Republicans control the House and have the votes to stall matters in the Senate, although Obama has tried to take the offensive since a big jobs speech in September and a slew of executive actions ever since.

Despite the political atmosphere in Washington, the scene is expected to have at least one unifying touch. Outgoing Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who survived an assassination attempt a year ago, is expected to attend with her colleagues. Her husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly, was attending as a guest of first lady Michelle Obama.

Obama's tone was under as much scrutiny as his proposals.

He was aiming to find all the right balances: offering outreach to Republicans while sharpening his competing vision, outlining re-election themes without overtly campaigning and pledging to work with Congress even as he presses a campaign to act without it.

The context was set not just by the re-election year, but by the awful past year of partisan breakdowns in Washington. The government neared both a shutdown and, even worse, a default on its obligations for the first time in history.

Less than 10 months before Election Day, the presidential race is shaping up as a contest between unmistakably different views of the economy and the role of government.

Obama is campaigning on the idea of helping people at least get a fair shot at a job, a house, a career and a better life. Republicans say he and his philosophy have become a crushing burden on free enterprise and that the president is resorting to what amounts to class warfare to get elected again.

He was to unveil new proposals to address the housing crisis that has left many people trapped, and he planned to promote steps to make college education more affordable.

The president was planning a traditional rundown on the state of American security and foreign policy — and a reminder that he kept a promise to end the Iraq war.

But his driving focus was to secure faith in the economic recovery and in voters' confidence that he is getting the country on the right path.

Obama planned to renew his call for his "Buffett rule" — a principle that millionaires should not pay a lower tax rate than typical workers. While middle-income filers fall in the 15 or 25 percent bracket, and millionaires face a 35 percent tax bracket, those who get their income from investments — not a paycheck — pay 15 percent.

The president named his idea after billionaire Warren Buffett, who says it is unfair that his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. The White House invited Buffett's secretary, Debbie Bosanek, to attend the State of the Union as a special guest.

And then for three days following his speech, Obama will promote his ideas in five swing-voting states.. On Wednesday he'll visit Iowa and Arizona to promote ideas to boost American manufacturing; on Thursday in Nevada and Colorado he'll discuss energy, and in Michigan on Friday he'll talk about college affordability, education and training.

Polling shows Americans are divided about Obama's overall job performance but unsatisfied with his handling of the economy.

3 St. Stanislaus School students in Chicopee win essay contest

$
0
0

The students will go on to compete in a district contest.

st. stanislaus schoolSt. Stanislaus school students Ashley Maczka, David Goudreault and Natalia Kaczor, from left, are winners in an essay contest on citizenship.

CHICOPEE – When asked to write about the responsibilities of a Catholic citizen, Ashley Maczka decided to focus on her experiences with Lorraine’s Soup Kitchen and its move to a new location.

The St. Stanislaus eighth-grader won second place in the essay contest sponsored by the Knights of Columbus Council 69 and will be entered into a district competition.

She wasn’t alone in her victory: Her classmates Natalia Kaczor, 13, and David Goudreault, 13, won first and third place, respectively.

This is the first year the council sponsored the contest for students in grade 8 through 12. Any Catholic student was invited to submit an essay exploring the topic of “the responsibility of the Catholic citizen in a free society,” said Delfo Barabani Jr., deputy grand knight of the council, located on Granby Road.

In total, 45 Chicopee teens, mostly eighth-graders, submitted essays. The three winning essays will be entered into a district-wide competition that covers much of Western Massachusetts. The best will then be entered into a state competition, he said.

“They were interesting and I’m amazed at the level some eighth-graders can write,” Barabani said.

Winners received savings bonds of $100, $75 and $50, he said.

Eighth-graders at St. Stanislaus School learn about American government in their social studies class, so the theme fit perfectly with the curriculum and also crossed over into their English and religion classes, Vice Principal Karen S. Shea said.

“They had to take time to reflect on their responsibilities as a Catholic in society and how you transfer faith responsibilities into society,” she said.

While Kaczor and Goudreault took a more general view, Maczka wanted to focus more on one issue.

“I wrote about how people did not want soup kitchens in the area because they were afraid of the people,” said Maczka, 14.

“Then they found out it was a great place,” she said. “They were not what they thought.”

Goudreault said he wrote about a variety of topics, mostly focusing on human rights through discussions about abortion, racism, genocide and the death penalty.

“I could be purple but I would still be a human being and want to be treated nicely and with respect,” he wrote.

He also discussed ways to help the poor and encouraged everyone to vote.

“I wrote about how people could help out more in the community,” he said.

First-place winner Kaczor said a lot of her focus was on human rights.

“I wrote about how people should think more about the environment and not too little because future generations will not have the same things we have,” she said.

The three said they worked hard on the essays, first researching their topics through websites and in books before writing them.

“It took me five days to come up with the subject and plan out how I was going to write it,” Kaczor said.

Goudreault said he spent about three days working out how to outline the essay and then started to do his research on the different subjects.

None expected to win.

“I was shocked. I honestly did not think I would have won but I put a lot of effort into it,” Kaczor said.

First place essay by Natalia Kaczor

Second-place essay by Ashley Maczka

Third place essay by David Goudreault

Connecticut police arrest fugitive at Mohegan Sun casino after her 5-year-old son turns her in

$
0
0

Police arrested Xiao Xu Wu and charged her with risk of injury to a minor and being a fugitive from justice,


UNCASEVILLE, Conn. - A 38-year-old New York City woman, who was sought by immigration officials for being in the country illegally and by North Carolina law enforcement in a counterfeit investigation, was arrested Tuesday after her 5-year-old son called 911 to say she had left him alone in a hotel room at the Mohegan Sun casino.

Police arrested Xiao Xu Wu and charged her with risk of injury to a minor and being a fugitive from justice, according to a news release by the Connecticut State Police Bureau of Criminal Investigation's Casino Licensing and Operations Unit.

A records check with the National Crime Information Center revealed that the federal Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement had issued an immigration detainer against Wu. It was also learned that an arrest warrant had been issued out of Rocky Mount, North Carolina for counterfeiting, police said.

According to the Rocky Mount Telegram reported that Wu had been sought since August 2010 as part of an investigation that resulted in the confiscation of more than $1 million in counterfeit designer purses, shoes and accessories.

Wu was being held Tuesday night on $200,000 bail pending her arraignment Wednesday. The Connecticut Department of Children and Families responded to the casino and took custody of her son.


State of the Union: Text of President Obama's address

$
0
0

Here is the text of President Obama’s State of the Union address.

Here is the text of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, as provided by the White House.


Live Obama mug 12412.jpgBarack H. Obama

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests and fellow Americans:

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq. Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought– and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Most of al-Qaida’s top lieutenants have been defeated. The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.

These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America’s armed forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. They’re not consumed with personal ambition. They don’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together.

Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example. Think about the America within our reach: A country that leads the world in educating its people. An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs. A future where we’re in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren’t so tied to unstable parts of the world. An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded.

We can do this. I know we can, because we’ve done it before. At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known. My grandfather, a veteran of Patton’s army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill. My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth.

The two of them shared the optimism of a nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism. They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share - the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement.

The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive. No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important. We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. What’s at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. We have to reclaim them.

Let’s remember how we got here. Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores. Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete. Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.

In 2008, the house of cards collapsed. We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them. Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people’s money. Regulators had looked the other way, or didn’t have the authority to stop the bad behavior.

It was wrong. It was irresponsible. And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag. In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs. And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect.

Those are the facts. But so are these. In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs. Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005. American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s. Together, we’ve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion. And we’ve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again.

The state of our union is getting stronger. And we’ve come too far to turn back now. As long as I’m president, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum. But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.

No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits. Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last– an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.

This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.

On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen. In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. We got workers and automakers to settle their differences. We got the industry to retool and restructure. Today, General Motors is back on top as the world’s number one automaker. Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company. Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories. And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.

We bet on American workers. We bet on American ingenuity. And tonight, the American auto industry is back.

What’s happening in Detroit can happen in other industries. It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh. We can’t bring back every job that’s left our shores. But right now, it’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China. Meanwhile, America is more productive. A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home. Today, for the first time in 15 years, Master Lock’s unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.

So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back. But we have to seize it. Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple: Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed.

We should start with our tax code. Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas. Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.

So let’s change it. First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it. That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.

Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas. From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax. And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.

Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut. If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here. And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.

My message is simple. It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America. Send me these tax reforms, and I’ll sign them right away.

We’re also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world. Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years. With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal - ahead of schedule. Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea. Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago.

I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products. And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules. We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration– and it’s made a difference. Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires. But we need to do more. It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated. It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized.

Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China. There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia. Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you– America will always win.

I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills. Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job. Think about that– openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.

That’s inexcusable. And we know how to fix it.

Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic. Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College. The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training. It paid Jackie’s tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.

I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did. Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job. My administration has already lined up more companies that want to help. Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running. Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers– places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.

And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need. It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a re-employment system that puts people to work.

These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today. But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.

For less than one percent of what our nation spends on education each year, we’ve convinced nearly every state in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning– the first time that’s happened in a generation.

But challenges remain. And we know how to solve them.

At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced states to lay off thousands of teachers. We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000. A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance. Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives. Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies– just to make a difference.

Teachers matter. So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer schools a deal. Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones. In return, grant schools flexibility: To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.

We also know that when students aren’t allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma. So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.

When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July. Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars. And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.

Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid. We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money. States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets. And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down. Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that. Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly. Some use better technology. The point is, it’s possible. So let me put colleges and universities on notice: If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down. Higher education can’t be a luxury– it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Let’s also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation. Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else.

That doesn’t make sense.

I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That’s why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before. That’s why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.

The opponents of action are out of excuses. We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now. But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country. Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship. I will sign it right away.

You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country. That means women should earn equal pay for equal work. It means we should support everyone who’s willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs.

After all, innovation is what America has always been about. Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses. So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed. Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow. Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs. Both parties agree on these ideas. So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year.

Innovation also demands basic research. Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched. New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet. Don’t gut these investments in our budget. Don’t let other countries win the race for the future. Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.

Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Over the last three years, we’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I’m directing my administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years. That’s right - eight years. Not only that - last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.

But with only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves, oil isn’t enough. This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy– a strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.

We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade. And I’m requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.

The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy. And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of 30 years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock– reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.

What’s true for natural gas is true for clean energy. In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world’s leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries. Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled. And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it.

When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance. But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan. Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts. Today, it’s hiring workers like Bryan, who said, “I’m proud to be working in the industry of the future.”

Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don’t always come right away. Some technologies don’t pan out; some companies fail. But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy. I will not walk away from workers like Bryan. I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here. We have subsidized oil companies for a century. That’s long enough. It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising. Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.

We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives. The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change. But there’s no reason why Congress shouldn’t at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. So far, you haven’t acted. Well tonight, I will. I’m directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes. And I’m proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world’s largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history - with the navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.

Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy. So here’s another proposal: Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings. Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them. Send me a bill that creates these jobs.

Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure. So much of America needs to be rebuilt. We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges. A power grid that wastes too much energy. An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world.

During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge. After World War II, we connected our states with a system of highways. Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.

In the next few weeks, I will sign an executive order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects. But you need to fund these projects. Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.

There’s never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst. Of course, construction workers weren’t the only ones hurt. So were millions of innocent Americans who’ve seen their home values decline. And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.

That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.

Let’s never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a government and a financial system that do the same. It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.

We’ve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn’t afford them. That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market. They make the free market work better.

There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly. In fact, I’ve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his. I’ve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don’t make sense. We’ve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years. We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill– because milk was somehow classified as an oil. With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.

I’m confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder. But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the gulf two years ago. I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean. I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men.

And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules. The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system’s core purpose: Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.

So if you’re a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers’ deposits. You’re required to write out a “living will” that details exactly how you’ll pay the bills if you fail - because the rest of us aren’t bailing you out ever again. And if you’re a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can’t afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over. Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them.

We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments. Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there’s no real penalty for being a repeat offender. That’s bad for consumers, and it’s bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing. So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count.

And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.

A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy. But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.

Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile. People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year. There are plenty of ways to get this done. So let’s agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.

When it comes to the deficit, we’ve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings. But we need to do more, and that means making choices. Right now, we’re poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households. Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.

Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else– like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans? Because if we’re serious about paying down our debt, we can’t do both.

The American people know what the right choice is. So do I. As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.

But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes. Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right: Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. In fact, if you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up. You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. You’re the ones who need relief.

Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.

We don’t begrudge financial success in this country. We admire it. When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich. It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference– like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet. That’s not right. Americans know it’s not right. They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility. That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit. That’s an America built to last.

I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care. But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now: Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken.

Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical?

The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn’t come from events beyond our control. It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not. Who benefited from that fiasco?

I’ve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street. But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad– and it seems to get worse every year.

Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics. So together, let’s take some steps to fix that. Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow. Let’s limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. Let’s make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa - an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington.

Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days. A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything– even routine business - passed through the Senate. Neither party has been blameless in these tactics. Now both parties should put an end to it. For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.

The executive branch also needs to change. Too often, it’s inefficient, outdated and remote. That’s why I’ve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people.

Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town. We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.

I’m a Democrat. But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more. That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States. That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work. That’s why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.

On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home.

The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government. And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress. With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow. But I can do a whole lot more with your help. Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can’t achieve.

That is the lesson we’ve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.

Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies. From Pakistan to Yemen, the al-Qaida operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can’t escape the reach of the United States of America.

From this position of strength, we’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.

As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli. A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators– a murderer with American blood on his hands. Today, he is gone. And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can’t be reversed, and that human dignity can’t be denied.

How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain. But we have a huge stake in the outcome. And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well. We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings– men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews. We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.

And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests. Look at Iran. Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one. The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent. Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.

The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe. Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever. Our ties to the Americas are deeper. Our iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history. We’ve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we’ve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we’ve led against hunger and disease; from the blows we’ve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back.

Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about. That’s not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us. That’s not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they’ve been in years. Yes, the world is changing; no, we can’t control every event. But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs– and as long as I’m President, I intend to keep it that way.

That’s why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget. To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.

Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it. As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us. That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned– which is why we’ve increased annual VA spending every year I’ve been President. And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.

With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets. Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families. And tonight, I’m proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.

Which brings me back to where I began. Those of us who’ve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops. When you put on that uniform, it doesn’t matter if you’re black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight. When you’re marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails. When you’re in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.

One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden. On it are each of their names. Some may be Democrats. Some may be Republicans. But that doesn’t matter. Just like it didn’t matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates– a man who was George Bush’s defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president.

All that mattered that day was the mission. No one thought about politics. No one thought about themselves. One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn’t deserve credit for the mission. It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job– the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs. More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other– because you can’t charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there’s someone behind you, watching your back.

So it is with America. Each time I look at that flag, I’m reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those 13 stripes. No one built this country on their own. This Nation is great because we built it together. This Nation is great because we worked as a team. This Nation is great because we get each other’s backs. And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard. As long as we’re joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Judge: New Hampshire city's sex offender ordinance unconstitutional

$
0
0

Merrimack Superior Court Judge Larry Smukler ruled that city officials failed to show that a Franklin ordinance barring sex offenders from living within 2,500 feet of a school protects children.

Gallery preview

By LYNNE TUOHY

CONCORD, N.H. – A Franklin city ordinance barring sex offenders from living within 2,500 feet of a school is unconstitutional, a judge has ruled.

Merrimack Superior Court Judge Larry Smukler ruled last week that city officials failed to show that the restriction protects children.

Registered sex offender William Thomas and the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union Foundation sued Franklin city officials who sought to enforce the 2007 ordinance after Thomas and a companion moved to Franklin from Massachusetts in 2010.

Thomas was convicted 27 years ago of sexually assaulting a minor in Massachusetts and spent three years in prison.

When he registered as a sex offender in Franklin, officials told him that he had 30 days to move out of his apartment because it was within 2,500 feet of a school. He had signed a two-year lease and told his landlord he was a sex offender.

The court granted Thomas a preliminary injunction in December 2010. The court's ruling now makes that injunction permanent.

Franklin City Manager Elizabeth Dragon says city officials are considering redrafting the ordinance. The ordinance bans sex offenders from living within 2,500 feet of a school, day care, playground, athletic field, public beach or municipal ski area.

New Hampshire state law requires sex offenders to register with the police department where they reside but puts no restrictions of where they may live. The court noted in its ruling that Thomas has never failed to comply with the sex offender registration requirement.

Attorney Barbara Keshen, director of the NHCLU Foundation, says city officials will be hard-pressed to frame an ordinance that passes constitutional muster.

"There have been so many empirical studies done around whether those restrictions protect children," Keshen said. "Virtually all have said there's no correlation. It's bad public policy."

The NHCLU several years ago succeeded in striking down a similar ordinance in Dover.

Keshen said Tilton, Northfield and Boscawen have ordinances similar to Franklin's. She said Boscawen's ordinance goes further— barring sex offenders from using the public library.

The ruling on Franklin's ordinance doesn't directly affect ordinances in other towns, but Keshen said it gives elected officials statewide something to consider.

"For anyone who is on a board of selectmen who is considering enacting an ordinance like this, there is legal precedent suggesting it would not be a very good idea," she said.

Keshen stressed that she and Thomas didn't challenge the provision of the Franklin city ordinance requiring sex offenders to obtain permission before entering a school. Keshen said that policy "makes sense."

Franklin City Councilor Jeffrey Rabinowitz, who supported the ordinance in 2007, said before its passage that he hadn't seen any evidence that it would protect children.

The Jan. 18 ruling quotes Rabinowitz as saying the ordinance would "give a false sense of protection."

State of the Union: It's getting stronger, President Obama says

$
0
0

The president outlined a vastly different vision for fixing the country than the one pressed by the Republicans challenging him in Congress and fighting to take his job.

An updated version of this story is now available at MassLive.


Obama State of the UnionPresident Barack Obama gestures while giving his State of the Union address on Capitol in Washington Tuesday night.

Click here to read the text of the State of the Union address.


By BEN FELLER

WASHINGTON – Declaring the American dream under siege, President Barack H. Obama called Tuesday night for a flurry of help for a hurting middle class and higher taxes on millionaires, delivering a State of the Union address filled with re-election themes. Restoring a fair shot for all, Obama said, is “the defining issue of our time.”

Obama outlined a vastly different vision for fixing the country than the one pressed by the Republicans challenging him in Congress and fighting to take his job in the November elections. He pleaded for an active government that ensures economic fairness for everyone, as his opponents demand that the government back off and let the free market rule.

Obama offered steps to help students afford college, a plan for more struggling homeowners to refinance their homes and tax cuts for manufacturers. He threw in some politically appealing references to accountability, including warning universities they will lose federal aid if they don’t stop tuition from soaring.

Standing in front of a divided Congress, with bleak hope this election year for much of his legislative agenda, Obama spoke with voters in mind.

“We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by,” Obama said. “Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.”

A rare wave of unity splashed over the House chamber at the start. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, survivor of an assassination attempt one year ago, received sustained applause from her peers and hugs from many. Obama, too, embraced her as he made his way to the front.

Lawmakers leapt to their feet when Obama said near the start of his speech that terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, killed by a raid authorized by the president, will no longer threaten America.

At the core of Obama’s address was the improving but deeply wounded economy – the matter still driving Americans’ anxiety and the one likely to determine the next presidency.

“The state of our union is getting stronger,” Obama said, calibrating his words as millions remain unemployed. Implicit in his declaration that the American dream is “within our reach” was the recognition that, after three years of an Obama presidency, the country is not there yet.

He spoke of restoring basic goals: owning a home, earning enough to raise a family, putting a little money away for retirement.

“We can do this,” Obama said. “I know we can.”

In a signature swipe at the nation’s growing income gap, Obama called for a new minimum tax rate of at least 30 percent on anyone making over $1 million. Many millionaires – including one of his chief rivals, Republican Mitt Romney – pay a rate less than that because they get most of their income from investments, which are taxed at a lower rate.

“Now you can call this class warfare all you want,” Obama said, responding to a frequent criticism from the GOP presidential field. “But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.”

Obama calls this the “Buffett rule,” named for billionaire Warren Buffett, who has said it’s unfair that his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. Emphasizing the point, Buffett’s secretary, Debbie Bosanek, attended the address in first lady Michelle Obama’s box.

Obama underlined every proposal with the idea that hard work and responsibility still count. He was targeting independent voters who helped seal his election in 2008 and the frustrated masses in a nation pessimistic about its course.

In a flag-waving defense of American power and influence abroad, Obama said the U.S. will safeguard its own security “against those who threaten our citizens, our friends and our interests.” On Iran, he said that while all options are on the table to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon – an implied threat to use military force – “a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible.”

With Congress almost universally held in low regard, Obama went after an easy target in calling for reforms to keep legislators from engaging in insider trading and holding them to the same conflict-of-interest standards as those that apply to the executive branch.


More details coming on MassLive and in The Republican.

Traffic big concern at Holyoke hearing on proposed $16 million Big Y mini-plaza

$
0
0

City Council president Kevin Jourdain guaranteed that if there's a restaurant, the council won't permit a drive-through window.

HOLYOKE – More than 100 people attended a public hearing Tuesday night on a planned $16 million mini-plaza set for Homestead Avenue and Lower Westfield Road.

A dominant concern residents expressed was that an already congested area would become unbearable with a project estimated to add more than 7,000 new vehicle trips a day.

The project is set to have 110,000 square feet of retail, anchored by a Big Y supermarket.

The project also will have a separate building with other stores that could include a restaurant, a bank and others, officials said.

Some residents like Bud Schlegel, 1079 Homeadstead Ave., asked site-owner O’Connell Development Group to reduce the project to consist of only a Big Y without the additional retail building.

“They could agree to that and they’ll be neighborhood-friendly,” Schlegel said.

The hearing at McMahon School on Kane Road was part of the Planning Board’s site plan review.

Officials said that since O’Connell received a zone change from the City Council last year, nothing can block the project from occupying the site, though the city can enforce rules regarding hours of operation, lighting and other things.

Council President Kevin A. Jourdain guaranteed to the hearing that the council wouldn’t approve a restaurant drive-through window if one is proposed. A drive-through would require a special permit from the council.

“A drive-through, it’s just never going to happen. That’ll never get through the City Council,” Jourdain said.

O’Connell Vice President Andrew J. Crystal told the hearing that when he said at the beginning of the hearing, on Jan. 10, that the project could have a fast-food restaurant with a drive-through window, that was only to note that that was an allowed use for that site.

But tenants beyond Big Y haven’t been chosen, he said.

“We are not proposing a fast-food restaurant,” Crystal said.

Some at the hearing were blunt, like Roxanne Wieland.

“It’s going to be ridiculous. Traffic’s going to be horrible. My property values are going to go down,” said Wieland, of 101 Meadowbrook Road.

Others like Gurninder Dhaliwal, owner of Dino’s Pizza Restaurant, 615 Homestead Ave., demanded answers. Dhaliwal said traffic there is snarled now and wanted to know how the city will deal with the project’s more than 7,000 vehicle trips a day.

“Where’s that traffic going to go?” Dhaliwal said.

Planning Board Chairwoman Eileen Regan said the city is working with site-owner O’Connell Development Group and the state to deal with the traffic problems.

“Everyone now is working to mitigate the traffic,” Regan said.

Dhaliwal was among those who said their understanding was the project initially was supposed to be only a Big Y and that a second retail building was a surprise.

“It would be like me going to City Hall and saying I’m going to open a pizza place and then, all of a sudden, it’s a strip club,” Dhaliwal said.

But Kathleen G. Anderson, director of the city Office of Planning and Development, said the project always included more than one retail building.

Mayor Alex B. Morse said that the project will happen and that the step now is to make it as acceptable as possible for all sides.

“My door’s always open ... if you all have concerns,” Morse said.

State of the Union: U.S. Rep. Richard Neal's reaction

$
0
0

Neal said he supports the presidents call for more tax fairness for middle class people.

Richard Neal mug 2011.jpgRichard E. Neal

The following is a copy of Congressman Richard E. Neal's response to President Obama's 2012 State of the Union Address.

"As a senior member of the House Ways and Means Committee, I support President Obama's call for more tax fairness for the middle class. There is no reason why a billionaire should be paying a lower effective tax rate than hard working families in Massachusetts. I also believe the overwhelming majority of American support simplifying the tax code. There is no reason why Democrats and Republicans can't work together in a bipartisan manner to shrink a tax code that has grown to more than 74,000 pages.
"President Obama also articulated a blueprint for the economy that will reduce our deficits, create jobs, and help promote continued growth. It is clear that one of his priorities tonight was speaking directly to the Americans family about concerns they have over growing income inequality. But I believe his positive, common sense approach, struck the right tone just as the economy appears to be turning around."

State of the Union: President Obama says American dream in peril

$
0
0

In his State of the Union address, the president pleaded for an active government that ensures economic fairness for everyone, just as his opponents demand that the government back off and let the free market rule.

Gallery preview

This is an updated version of a story posted at 9:36 this evening.


By BEN FELLER

WASHINGTON – Declaring the American dream under siege, President Barack H. Obama called Tuesday night for a flurry of help for a hurting middle class and higher taxes on millionaires, delivering a State of the Union address packed with re-election themes. Restoring a fair shot for all, Obama said, is “the defining issue of our time.”

Obama outlined a vastly different vision for fixing the country than the one pressed by the Republicans challenging him in Congress and fighting to take his job in the November election. He pleaded for an active government that ensures economic fairness for everyone, just as his opponents demand that the government back off and let the free market rule.

Obama offered steps to help students afford college, a plan for more struggling homeowners to refinance their homes and tax cuts for manufacturers. He threw in politically appealing references to accountability, including warning universities they will lose federal aid if they don’t stop tuition from soaring.

Standing in front of a divided Congress, with bleak hope this election year for much of his legislative agenda, Obama spoke with voters in mind.

“We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by,” Obama said. “Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.”

A rare wave of unity splashed over the House chamber at the start. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, survivor of an assassination attempt one year ago, received sustained applause from her peers and cheers of “Gabby, Gabby, Gabby.” She blew a kiss to the podium. Obama embraced her.

Lawmakers leapt to their feet when Obama said near the start of his speech that terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, killed by a raid authorized by the president, will no longer threaten America.

At the core of Obama’s address was the improving but deeply wounded economy – the matter still driving Americans’ anxiety and the one likely to determine the next presidency.


Click here to read the text of the president's State of the Union speech.


“The state of our union is getting stronger,” Obama said, calibrating his words as millions remain unemployed. Implicit in his declaration that the American dream is “within our reach” was the recognition that, after three years of an Obama presidency, the country is not there yet.

He spoke of restoring basic goals: owning a home, earning enough to raise a family, putting a little money away for retirement.

“We can do this,” Obama said. “I know we can.” He said Americans are convinced that “Washington is broken,” but he also said it wasn’t too late to cooperate on important matters.

Republicans were not impressed. They applauded infrequently, though they did cheer when the president quoted “Republican Abraham Lincoln” as saying: “That government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves – and no more.”

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, offering the formal GOP response, called Obama’s policies “pro-poverty” and his tactics divisive.

“No feature of the Obama presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us, to curry favor with some Americans by castigating others,” Daniels said in excerpts released before the address.

In a signature swipe at the nation’s growing income gap, Obama called for a new minimum tax rate of at least 30 percent on anyone making over $1 million. Many millionaires – including one of his chief rivals, Republican Mitt Romney – pay a rate less than that because they get most of their income from investments, which are taxed at a lower rate.

“Now you can call this class warfare all you want,” Obama said, responding to a frequent criticism from the GOP presidential field. “But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.”

Obama calls this the “Buffett rule,” named for billionaire Warren Buffett, who has said it’s unfair that his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. Emphasizing the point, Buffett’s secretary, Debbie Bosanek, attended the address in first lady Michelle Obama’s box.

Obama underlined every proposal with the idea that hard work and responsibility still count. He was targeting independent voters who helped seal his election in 2008 and the frustrated masses in a nation pessimistic about its course.

In a flag-waving defense of American power and influence abroad, Obama said the U.S. will safeguard its own security “against those who threaten our citizens, our friends and our interests.” On Iran, he said that while all options are on the table to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon – an implied threat to use military force – “a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible.”

With Congress almost universally held in low regard, Obama went after an easy target in calling for reforms to keep legislators from engaging in insider trading and holding them to the same conflict-of-interest standards as those that apply to the executive branch.

With the foreclosure crisis on ongoing sore spot despite a number of administration housing initiatives over the past three years, Obama proposed a new program to allow homeowners with privately held mortgages to refinance at lower interest rates. Administration officials offered few details but estimated savings at $3,000 a year for average borrowers.

Obama proposed steps to crack down on fraud in the financial sector and mortgage industry, with a Financial Crimes Unit to monitor bankers and financial service professionals, and a separate special unit of federal prosecutors and state attorneys general to expand investigations into abusive lending that led to the housing crisis.

At a time of tight federal budgets and heavy national debt, Obama found a ready source of money to finance his ideas: He proposed to devote half of the money no longer being spent on the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan to “do some nation-building right here at home,” to help create more jobs and increase competitiveness. The other half, he said, would go to help pay down the national debt.

Obama also offered a defense of regulations that protect the American consumer – regulations often criticized by Republicans as job-killing obstacles.

“Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a government and a financial system that do the same,” Obama said. “It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.”

Obama will follow up Tuesday night’s address with a three-day tour of five states key to his re-election bid. On Wednesday he’ll visit Iowa and Arizona to promote ideas to boost American manufacturing; on Thursday in Nevada and Colorado he’ll discuss energy, and in Michigan on Friday he’ll talk about college affordability, education and training.

Polling shows Americans are divided about Obama’s overall job performance but unsatisfied with his handling of the economy.

The speech Tuesday night comes just one week before the Florida Republican primary that could help set the trajectory for the rest of the race.

Romney, caught up in a tight contest with a resurgent Newt Gingrich, commented in advance to Obama’s speech.

“Tonight will mark another chapter in the misguided policies of the last three years – and the failed leadership of one man,” Romney said from Florida.

State of the Union: Massachusetts Democratic Party chair John Walsh

$
0
0

Walsh issued a statement calling Obama's address 'a positive vision for an America built to last."

John Walsh 2009.jpgMassachusetts Democratic party chairman John E. Walsh is seen in a visit to Springfield in 2009.

BOSTON– Following President Obama’s State of the Union address tonight, Massachusetts Democratic Party Chair John Walsh released the following statement:

“Tonight, President Obama laid out his positive vision for an America built to last and a blueprint for creating an economy where hard work pays off and everyone plays by the same rules.

“We are at a critical moment for middle-class families who have had the deck stacked against them for a generation and America faces two choices. We can either drift back into an economy where the burden of stability is placed squarely on the shoulders of the middle class and opportunity is reserved for a wealthy few, or we can move America forward by building a nation where everyone pays their fair share and everyone has a chance to succeed.

“The Massachusetts economy is growing stronger every day because we’ve made the choice to move the Commonwealth forward with investments in education, infrastructure and innovation. After President Obama came into office with an economy in free fall, he stopped the bleeding and started working to rebuild a stronger, fairer economy. Tonight, the President reminded us that the path to making our nation better is paved with the values that have already made the American middle class the envy of the world. Now all we have to do is take it."


State of the Union: Massachusetts Senator John Kerry

$
0
0

Kerry issued a statement praising the address for having both common sense and common ground.

debt john kerry.JPGJohn Kerry, D-Mass.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator John Kerry tonight released a statement following President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address:

"If Members of Congress are going to be honest about it, there was a lot of common sense and even more common ground in tonight’s address. We shouldn’t have to wait for another year or another election to act like it. Tax reform, energy security, infrastructure, and jobs matter to all of us and we’re so much closer on these issues than the shrillness of our politics pretends we are. We ought to prove peoples’ suspicions wrong and prove that Congress can actually get something done even in an election year. Dysfunction isn’t defensible.”

State of the Union: Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick

$
0
0

Gov. Patrick issued a statement following the address, praising its ideas and urging Congress now to act on them.

Deval Patrick 7811.jpgDeval L. Patrick


BOSTON - Mass. Governor Deval L. Patrick issued the following statement following President Obama's State of the Union address:

"President Obama's State of the Union address was both powerful and inspiring. These are challenging times for so many of us and tonight, before the Congress and the American people, the President showed that he is willing to fight to keep the American dream within reach for all.

The President is right that we are making progress, and it is not by accident. Our economy is turning the corner, and our troops are coming home. Quality health care is now accessible to all Americans, and we are safer from our enemies abroad. And despite these exceptional achievements, the President and the American people know there is more to do.
But to do that, the Congress must give him the tools he needs to finish the job.

Here in Massachusetts, we continue to lead the nation in job creation, student achievement and health care because I have a legislature that works alongside me, not against me. If only our President, at this critical time for our nation, could say the same. We will remember at the ballot box those who stand in the way of this President and the vital work he will do in the days ahead, and we will deliver him a new majority in the Congress in 2012."


New Agawam School Superintendent William Sapelli gets 3-year contract

$
0
0

The School Committee has agreed to give the new school superintendent a three-year contract.

william p. sapelli.JPGAgawam School Superintendent William P. Sapelli

AGAWAM – The School Committee announced Tuesday that it has agreed to sign newly appointed school Superintendent William P. Sapelli to a three-year contract with a starting salary of $140,000.

Sapelli had been interim school superintendent since August.

“We feel very comfortable in selecting him for a permanent position,” School Committee Vice Chairman Anthony C. Bonavita said Tuesday of an unanimous vote of the school board during a special School Committee meeting Dec. 19. “We think he has been doing a great job.”

According to the contract, Sapelli will be paid $140,000 for the first year with increases in the second and third years equal to those received by teachers in the collective bargaining unit.

Bonavita said Sapelli has been paid a salary in the vicinity of about $130,000 a year.

The school official described Sapelli, 57, as someone who is very familiar with the school system because of his many years working in it and who is “very much loved” by people in the system.

Sapelli was appointed interim school superintendent this summer to replace former School Superintendent Mary A. Czajkowski, who left to take a job on Cape Cod. At that time, it was with the understanding that his interim appointment would be for a year and could lead to the superintendent’s post if school officials were happy with his work.

Bonavita said the School Committee was so pleased with the job Sapelli has done that it decided to move forward and name him to the position rather than waiting for a year to elapse.

“I’m very excited. I’ve come full circle. I went to school here,” Sapelli said Tuesday about his new job and alluding to the fact that he grew up in Agawam.

Sapelli is a 1972 graduate of Agawam High School.

He has held a variety of posts in Agawam public schools, including assistant school superintendent for curriculum and instruction for nine years under Czajkowski. A 34-year veteran of the department, he has also been a classroom teacher as well as principal of Robinson Park School and a head hockey coach.

State of the Union: U.S. Sen. Scott Brown reacts to president's address

$
0
0

If both parties "choose to put progress and patriotism over partisanship, then we can get our economy moving again, put workers back on the job and get important things done for our country," Brown said in a prepared statement.

U.S. Senator Scott P. Brown issued the following statement following President Obama’s State of the Union address:


Scott Brown profile 2011.jpgScott P. Brown

"President Obama outlined several areas where I believe we can make bipartisan progress. I was especially glad to hear the president say it was time to put aside rigid ideology and start working to find common sense solutions. There are too many people in Washington for whom nothing less than 100 percent of what they want is acceptable. They would rather have a good fight than pass a good bill. But if both parties choose to put progress and patriotism over partisanship, then we can get our economy moving again, put workers back on the job and get important things done for our country. We’re Americans first."

Senator Brown Legislative Proposals Endorsed By President Obama:

Access to Capital: Senator Brown is the author of the Senate legislation to legalize crowdfunding, the Democratizing Access to Capital Act (S. 1791), which would allow small businesses, entrepreneurs and start-ups to use the internet to raise capital from a wide range of ordinary investors.

President Obama tonight: “After all, innovation is what America has always been about. Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses. So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed. Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow.”

Learn To Earn/Job Training: Senator Brown authored the Learn to Earn Reemployment Training Improvement Act of 201, which would consolidate 47 unproven federal job training programs into a state-run reemployment program. The legislation gives those on unemployment insurance the option to receive paid, on-the-job training at private businesses. The program would help the growing ranks of long-term unemployed learn the new skills necessary to vie for more job openings or make a career change.

President Obama tonight: “And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need. It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.”

Ending Insider Trading in Congress: Senator Brown introduced the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2011, which prohibits members or employees of Congress from using nonpublic information obtained through their employment for their own personal benefit.

President Obama tonight: “Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow.”

Extending the Payroll Tax Cut/American Jobs Act: On October 6, 2011, Senator Brown sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell enumerating areas of the President’s jobs act that he supported, including the payroll tax cut extension. The senator voted for the temporary extension in December 2011 and publicly challenged House Republicans to pass the bipartisan agreement.

President Obama tonight: “There are plenty of ways to get this done. So let’s agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.”

Refinancing Government Mortgages: On September 29, 2011, Senator Brown wrote an op-ed entitled “Refinancing, a market solution” for the Boston Globe, saying, “But there is a solution, one that has the support of a bipartisan group of senators, myself included… If allowed to refinance at today’s rate, a borrower who has been dutifully making monthly payments on, say, a $200,000 government mortgage at a 6 percent rate could save around $3,000 every year. …If done correctly, allowing refinancing of government mortgages will save taxpayer money… lower monthly payments for responsible homeowners would reduce the risk of foreclosures.”

President Obama tonight: “That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape.”

State of the Union: President Obama right on economic disparities, political pundits say

$
0
0

President Barack Obama did well at deflecting Republicans' accusation that he was causing a division over wealth, according to The National Journal.

Obama.jpgPresident Barack Obama delivers the State of the Union address in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama emphasized economic inequality, calling it "the defining issue of our time," in his State of the Union address Tuesday.

The core of Obama's speech centered on the the broad message that wealthy Americans should do more to help the economy recover, prompting The National Journal to ask, "Common sense or class warfare?" following Obama's speech.

Ron Fournier of The National Journal pointed out that Obama deflected the accusation that he was causing division over wealth and instead told Congress to do something about the division.

Obama proposed in the speech the "Buffet Rule," after Warren Buffet. Buffet said he shouldn't pay taxes at a lower rate than his secretary Debbie Bosanek, who attended the State of the Union address.

"Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense."

Fournier concluded that Obama is right that it's common sense because statistics show that upward mobility in the United States is decreasing.

Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico noted that the health care reform bill Obama spent a year on didn't get much play in his State of the Union address.

However, it's rare for a president to have an increase in poll numbers following a State of the Union address and Obama isn't any different, according to Reid Wilson of The National Journal.

Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images