As 26 states argue that the health care mandate requiring citizens to purchase health insurance from private companies in unconstitutional, the U.S. Senate candidates in Massachusetts chime in.
With the United States Supreme Court set to hear arguments about the Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act this coming week, the topic of health care reform is hot as ever.
More than half of the states in the country have argued that the health care mandate requiring citizens to purchase health insurance from private companies in unconstitutional. Additionally, some states argue that the expansion of Medicaid to include many more adults, which will result in increased costs to the states over time, is also a stretch of the Constitution.
For three days this coming week, the Supreme Court will listen to six hours of arguments from both sides of the fence, with the Obama Administration arguing that the Commerce Clause in the Constitution allows the law and opponents arguing it doesn't. The court will also determine whether it can even rule on the case since the law doesn't go into effect until 2014.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case after three lower courts were split in their rulings about the health care law.
"I campaigned against the President's health care bill, I voted to repeal it and would vote to repeal it again," Brown said. "We already have health care in Massachusetts and we did it how we wanted to do it. People love the care and coverages that we have but they don't like the cost. The costs are out of control. The legislature and the governor can fix that and I'm encouraging them to do it."
Consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren, Brown's chief Democratic rival in his re-election bid, said she believes the law is right for the nation, calling increased protections for citizens included in the legislation "basic rights."
"I support the Affordable Care Act. Thanks to the new law, insurance companies cannot discriminate based on pre-existing conditions, 2.5 million young adults are now covered by health insurance through their parents’ plan and more than 100 million people no longer have a lifetime limit on their insurance," Warren said. "Scott Brown and all the other Republicans want to repeal these basic rights. Going forward, Congress should focus more on lowering costs. That’s what I’ll do as a U.S. Senator."
Brown said his concern about the costs of the health care law in Massachusetts are mirrored in his concern about the federal law, primarily relating to Medicare.
"I love it when they say 'Senator Brown, please don't cut our Medicare.' The only ones that have cut Medicare is the Democrats when they cut a half-trillion dollars," Brown said. "We can do it better and have done it better."
Marisa DeFranco, a Middleton immigration lawyer and Warren's only remaining opponent vying for the Democratic nomination to take on Brown in November's general election, supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act but feels Democrats failed by not pushing it further to include a public option.
"The mandate to buy coverage from the health insurance companies, which is a Republican idea, is the crux of the problem," DeFranco said. "I'm glad we did something on the national level but the Democrats really capitulated on the public option and that was a mistake. They started with the public option as their top marker. It's classic negotiation 101, you negotiate high to end up at middle or high ground of where you want to end. They should have started with single-payer and they would have ended up with a public option. If the insurance companies are really behind their free market mentality, then operate in a market. And if the government is your competitor and you're so much better than the government, compete."
When asked if she supports a single-payer health care system, funded through taxes to pay the doctors, Warren said the focus needs to be on the law as it stands.
"I think the urgent question now is whether we’re going to be able to hold on to the health care reforms that just passed," Warren said. "There are a lot of people who want to repeal them. I think we need to focus on protecting them and on finding new ways to lower costs, which are still too high."
On the topic of stem cell research, all three candidates believe it is a promising field worthy of further development.
Brown cited his work on the state level where he helped override then Gov. Mitt Romeny to approve stem cell research in the Bay State.
"Because of that I think we have one of the strongest and most viable stem cell bills in the country," Brown said. "I'm in favor of stem cells but we have to balance the moral concerns with the scientific opportunities. And what I've found is that there are good people on both sides of those issues and if you can get them together in a room to hammer it out, it works."
Warren said she supports "stem cell research to help find medical breakthroughs that will improve the lives and health of people across the country."
DeFranco denounced the politicization of the issue, saying it costs lives instead of saving them.
"I support Stem Cell Research. We are decades behind in the cutting edge research that could save and improve lives," DeFranco said in a statement. "While politicians dither, people are dying of diseases that might be cured or delayed with stem cells."