Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown and Democratic challengers Elizabeth Warren and Marisa DeFranco hold varying views on immigration and immigration reform.
Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown and Democratic challengers Elizabeth Warren and Marisa DeFranco hold varying views on immigration and immigration reform.
(AP & Republican file photos)
MassLive Politics Coverage
Follow politics reporter Robert Rizzuto on Twitter
Immigration reform is always a contentious issue, but during an election year the discussion ramps up along with the rhetoric as candidates spar on the particulars of a complicated issue.
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., spent time this week touting the federal Secure Communities program, which many Bay State lawmakers have resisted.
The program, which will be implemented nationwide in 2013, requires that fingerprints taken by local police during booking be shared with federal authorities to identify anyone in the country illegally, teeing them up for deportation.
Amid public outcry, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said the state wouldn't participate in the program but President Barack Obama said it will be implemented regardless of a state's agreement.
Brown has been pushing for Massachusetts to embrace the program since last year, citing several violent crimes allegedly committed by illegal immigrants.
During his tour this week of county jails in Worcester and Bristol counties, where the respective sheriffs have been outspoken supporters of Secure Communities, the Massachusetts Republican Party took aim at Elizabeth Warren, Brown's chief Democratic rival in his re-election bid.
“We already knew that Professor Warren opposed the Secure Communities Act. Now we learn that she also opposes the border fence and supports in-state tuition for illegal immigrants," said Alleigh Marre, spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Republican Party. "Warren's ideas on illegal immigration are unfair to millions of legal immigrants who play by the rules as they wait patiently to come into the country."
The statement was accompanied by a new web video which paints Warren as "out of touch" with Bay State voters on the issue of immigration.
Warren's campaign struck back, telling The Republican that she isn't opposed to the program entirely, but believes it needs tweaking to address concerns that it promotes racial profiling and creates a chilling effect on immigrants in relation to working with and reporting crime to local police agencies.
“Elizabeth believes that the FBI and ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) should share information to ensure that we can get dangerous and violent offenders off our streets," said Alethea Harney, Warren's press secretary. "She also understands that law enforcement officials in Massachusetts and across the country believe that the current program is creating barriers between police and communities and making it harder for them to work together to keep our neighborhoods safe. She thinks that a program that targets violent and dangerous offenders while taking the legitimate concerns of law enforcement into account can be implemented effectively."
On the topic of a border fence, which Brown supports, Warren believes it is time to move past a fence and work toward implementing other solutions.
"We've doubled our border patrol forces over the last decade and there is 650 miles of fencing along the border," Harney said. "Elizabeth believes the next step needs to be common sense, comprehensive immigration reform that is fair to taxpayers and legal immigrants."
Warren and Brown both agree that enforcing existing laws against hiring illegal immigrants are key to any immigration policy moving forward, but the similarities basically stop there.
On the topic of the DREAM Act, which would create a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who complete high school and obtain a higher education degree or join the military, Brown is adamantly against it, calling the process a form of amnesty.
Warren, on the other hand, supports the idea, calling it the "right" thing to do.
The bill was first proposed in 2011 and came up again last year as part of a defense spending bill, which Brown specifically took issue with.
Marisa DeFranco, a Middleton immigration lawyer and Warren's competition for the Democratic nod to take on Brown in the general election, has built a career out of learning the intricacies of the immigration system in the U.S.
She feels that the pending Secure Communities program will destroy decades of progress made through community policing.
In DeFranco's view, the immigration process as it stands today is daunting and expensive, making legal immigration near impossible for many.
"A lot of people will say to me that their grandparents came legally, and why can't immigrants do that today?" DeFranco previously said. "But what they don't realize is that back then there was an open border policy. Now you can only come through an immediate relative or through business. There are asylum cases, but those are much more complicated. It is not easy or cheap to become a U.S. citizen, although the process does have its fair points such as a citizenship option following five years with a green card."
DeFranco supports creating a path to legalization for illegal immigrants already here by requiring them to pay a fine of $4,000 as well as any back taxes and pass English language and government tests before getting in the back of the line and wait seven years rather than the five years people currently wait.
Warren's proposed path to citizenship for those already here illegally is similar, as she cites payment of back taxes and moving to the back of the line behind current applicants as part of the process.