Since Ameristar introduced a casino plan in November for Springfield, officials and residents have wondered how the company would handle traffic.
A Las Vegas-based company is planning an estimated $50 million road and bridge project off Interstate 291 in Springfield to service its planned casino.
Gordon Kanofsky, chief executive officer for Ameristar Casinos, Thomas M. Steinbauer, chief financial officer, and other top company officials quietly held separate meetings with city planners and engineers and a neighborhood group last week.
The meetings were held partly to brief local officials and residents on the company’s much-anticipated transportation plans for the proposed $500 million casino resort on Page Boulevard near I-291, which is a connector highway that joins Interstate 91 in downtown Springfield with the Massachusetts Turnpike.
Since Ameristar introduced the casino plan in November, officials and residents have wondered how the company would handle traffic.
“This is the number one question I get, not only from the neighborhood but also from the city of Springfield,” said Troy Stremming, a senior vice president for Ameristar. “We had to move forward with finding a solution.”
Troy Stremming
Ameristar last November purchased the 41-acre site at Page Boulevard and Interstate 291 for $16 million from an affiliate of the O'Connell Development Group Inc., which had anticipated a large-scale retail project on the site. The land was the site of an old Westinghouse plant.
The Ameristar transportation plan would not require the taking of any privately owned land or the removal of any home or businesses, according to Stremming. He said he did not believe it would require any easements but it will need state approval for using the right of ways off Interstate 291 for new frontage roads or dedicated lanes.
The plan, designed by VHB Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc. in Springfield, calls for dedicated lanes in the right of way of both sides of I-291. The northbound lanes would be after the St. James exit and southbound lane after the Page Boulevard exit.
Heading north, or east, motorists would get into the dedicated lane, take a short ramp to a stop light at the top of the ramp and then take a left over a proposed new bridge over I-291 to the Ameristar property.
Traveling south, or west, drivers would be directed into another dedicated lane that would not require a bridge since it is on the same side of the highway as the planned casino. This lane would go over Page Boulevard and would exit onto the casino property.
Kevin E. Kennedy, chief development officer for the city of Springfield, said the plan generally makes some sense. The plan is appealing because it would keep a lot of casino traffic off city streets, Kennedy said.
Kevin Kennedy
Ameristar officials met with Kennedy and then presented the plan in more detail to officials with the planning department and the department of public works. Both departments were reasonably satisfied with the plan, Kennedy said.
Stremming said the plan would mean that 90 percent of the casino’s traffic would be removed from Page Boulevard. Stremming said the alternative was chosen over other, cheaper possibilities such as improving exits and entrances at Interstate 291 and Page Boulevard, installing traffic signals and widening the boulevard.
“People were impressed that we were not just trying to do the minimum,” Stremming said. “We are trying to do the right thing.”
He said the company may need to donate land to create a small city street to provide access to the proposed casino from a dedicated lane.
Stremming said officials at the Massachusetts Department of Transportation declined to meet with Ameristar leaders to discuss the transportation plan.
Michael Verseckes, a spokesman for the department, said it is too early in the process to meet with casino companies about transportation plans. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission, the independent state agency that would license and regulate casinos, will not seek bids for specific projects until sometime next year.
Michael A. Fenton, a member of the Springfield City Council who represents Ward 2, said Ameristar’s proposal is encouraging.
Michael Fenton
Fenton, who is neutral on the casino proposal, said the proposal attempts to keep a large majority of casino traffic off main local roads in the area such as Page Boulevard, East Street, Carew Street, St. James Boulevard and Roosevelt Avenue. Those streets, as well as many side residential streets, he said, could be impacted by a casino.
“It’s headed in the right direction,” said Fenton, who attended the meeting with Ameristar and the East Springfield Neighborhood Council last week.
James J. Ferrera, president of the Springfield City Council, said a 15-member casino site committee will ask Ameristar to present the company’s transportation plan to the committee. Ferrera created the committee and appointed himself and other members including some who asked to be named.
Ferrera said it would be premature to comment because he has not seen any renderings or a formal proposal by the company.
In the only other announced casino plan for Western Massachusetts, the Mohegan Sun is planning “flyover” ramps off the Massachusetts Turnpike to bring customers directly to its proposed casino resort on a hill next to Exit 8 in Palmer.
Paul E. Burns, president of the Palmer Town Council, said the flyover would go over Route 32. Burns said he has not seen a plan of the flyover but Mohegan officials have talked about it and he believes it would be the best solution since it could mitigate traffic congestion.
A state law allows the gaming commission to license up to three casino resorts in different geographic zones including one for anywhere in the four counties of Western Massachusetts.