Selectboard listed nine problem areas with the project that must be addressed should the state approve the new housing.
SOUTH HADLEY – The controversial proposal to build 60 condominium duplex houses – with a 120-space parking lot - on five acres along Ferry Street - is a bad idea, the selectboard said on Tuesday and unanimously voted to urge the state to prevent the developer from building it. The board also listed nine problem areas with the project that must be addressed should the state approve the new housing.
The Boston consulting firm SEB LLC submitted the application to the state on behalf of Riverside Condominiums, LLC, of Chicopee. The builders are seeking the state’s permission to build using the controversial state law known as 40B.
The 40B designation would allow the project to get built even without having to comply with South Hadley zoning bylaws. In addition, the builder only would go before the Zoning Board of Appeals for approval.
The Planning Board unanimously rejected a plan to build 27 condominiums at the Ferry Street parcel in 2011.
At the time, the builders sought a special permit from the town. Because the special permit was denied, the company was required to wait two years before being able to appear again before the Planning Board to resubmit a proposal.
The much larger revamped plans show a $10.5 million cost to build 45 “market” price homes – projected to sell at $195,000 each and 15 “affordable” units at $165,000. Proposals brought under 40B must have at least 20 to 25 percent of the units deemed affordable.
Municipalities with less than 10 percent of their housing stock qualifying as low-income are subject to 40B housing developments. South Hadley’s ratio is about 5.5 percent, according to town planner Richard Harris.
Town officials say the zoning in the Ferry Street area only allows about one home per 1.8 acres - and say the condo proposal squeezes in more than six times that amount in addition to a 120-vehicle parking area.
“Certainly, the Town of South Hadley does allow this type of density in certain parts of the town, especially to promote affordable housing. While affordable housing is appropriate for the neighborhood in which the project is proposed, the type of density proposed is not appropriate for this neighborhood,” the board wrote. Its letter is addressed to MassHousing’s Michael Busby, the 40B Project Coordinator and is dated March 5.
“The board urges MassHousing to reject the application by RCL for a project eligibility letter but if such a letter is to be issued it should be subject to conditions.”
In addition to asking the state to require the density to comport with “a level appropriate for the area,” the selectboard said drainage, building design, utility and well, energy efficiency, operating cost, fire safety, wetlands, and transportation issues must be mitigated with stringent conditions – if the state says yes to the 40B designation.
Should the state issue a 40B certificate to the builder, the project then goes to the town's appeals board.