In the hours leading to the polls closing in West Springfield, precincts reported solid voter turnout and both project supporters and opponents could be seen waving their respective signs across the city.
WEST SPRINGFIELD — When the final votes were tallied on Tuesday, opponents of a resort casino here rejoiced while hopes for a Hard Rock New England facility coming to West Side were killed.
By a 55-45 percent vote, West Springfield residents defeated the proposal, turning what was supposed to be a Hard Rock victory party into a sad affair at the Dante Club across from the Eastern States Exposition, where the project would have been built.
Tim Maland, president of the company's New England division established specifically to help develop the West Springfield project, said he was disappointed but respects the voters.
"We communicated our message and I think we were clear. But the message the voters heard wasn't enough to convince them that we were trying to bring them more than a casino," Maland said. "But they voted with their heart and conscience and it was close. I can respect that."
Maland said the company's Massachusetts plans that previously involved exploring other cities and partnerships in the state are now over.
"That is not even something I've considered," Maland said when asked if Hard Rock would now try for a license elsewhere. "We were focused on winning here and we lost."
Several West Springfield residents inside the club voiced their anger over their neighbors killing the proposal.
"This is the city of 'no!' They vote against everything and are completely afraid of change," said Virginia Reardon. "The opposition used scare tactics and here we are with something else they wouldn't approve."
Resident Ruth Kuras said she feels the Eastern States Exposition is going to suffer after losing the chance to have a casino on its grounds since one will be in the region before long.
"This is just a shame," she said. "It is going to change the face of West Springfield and not in a good way. I just don't see a casino coming into Springfield and helping the community the way Hard Rock was going to here. We didn't just lose a casino, we lost a part of our future."
Virginia Podisadlo said that she is concerned for what the vote will mean for her grandchildren.
"We played an honest game and we lost. But I'm afraid that the future generations here are going to suffer in terms of jobs and crime. This is awful," she said.
In the hours leading to the polls closing in West Springfield, precincts reported solid voter turnout and both project supporters and opponents could be seen waving their respective signs across the city. In the end, 7,570 residents turned out to vote, with the proposition losing by just 750 votes.
According to campaign finance documents filed with the city, Hard Rock and the pro-casino movement spent $936,920 trying to get the project approved.
The nearly $1 million Hard Rock spent includes $155,000 in "charitable contributions," with a majority of that cash flowing into the coffers of the Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts.
Opponents working with the No Casino West Springfield Inc. spent just $1,765 of the nearly $2,000 they collected, with a majority going toward printed materials and a couple ads with a local newspaper. The group was aided by the anti-casino effort in Springfield, as it lent out its yard signs for their effort.
But as state campaign finance law only requires a filing eight days before the election, the reports didn't show the sudden influx of cash to the opposition or either side's expenditures in the race's dog days.
Nathan Bech, a Republican who ran unsuccessfully against now retired Democratic Congressman John Olver in 2008, said that in his position as leader of the opposition, he knows where the thousands of dollars donated in the last week came from, but he wouldn't say ahead of the vote.
09.10.2013 | WEST SPRINGFIELD -- John J. Juliano Jr, Tim Kwiatkowski and Greg Chiecko pf the Eastern States Exposition watch the casino results at the Dante Club.Photo by Dave Roback / The Republican
He did say that outside of the campaign finance reports obtained from the West Springfield town clerk's office, the vote "no" movement spent money advertising via print and broadcast media, including an ad in The Republican.
"We tried to be strategic with the money we did have," Bech said. "All together, we probably ended up spending about $15,000."
Early on election day Hard Rock's campaign manager, Kate Crowther of Northampton, took issue with Bech's secrecy regarding where the money came from, but conceded that little could be done about it so close to the polls closing.
"We have spent our own money and were transparent in the process," she said, adding that much of the company's money spent in the last seven days was to take care of their volunteers who were making phone calls, knocking on doors and holding demonstrations for the casino.
Hard Rock International currently operates four casinos in the United States and three casinos in foreign countries, and is planning on opening an Ohio venture before the end of the year. The entertainment company was competing with MGM Resorts International's Springfield casino proposal and Mohegan Sun's Palmer project to battle for the state's sole Western Massachusetts casino license.
Springfield voters approved MGM's proposal 58 to 42 percent in July, and Palmer will vote on Mohegan Sun's project on Nov. 5. The projects that get approval from their respective host communities will move on to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission for further review, before one is ultimately awarded the region's sole casino license.
This is a developing story and will be updated as reporting continues from West Springfield.