Longmeadow Select Board member Alex Grant says his personal views on casino should not affect negotiations with MGM Springfield.
LONGMEADOW — MGM Resorts International Vice President Michael C. Mathis has expressed his disappointment in the lack of progress in negotiations with Longmeadow in a letter that has caused some internal conflict among board members.
Mathis sent a letter to Town Manager Stephen Crane claiming the town's attorneys have displayed an "adversarial posture," and questioning "the conduct of certain members of your Select Board."
In response, Select Board member Alex Grant, who is against a casino proposed in Springfield, sent a letter without conferring with the board, stating the casino will be detrimental to Western Massachusetts businesses and residents.
Longmeadow, like many communities before it, is in negotiations with MGM to become a surrounding community, which means its would be owed mitigation for any adverse affects of a casino in Springfield.
In his letter, Mathis, vice president of global gaming development, details the casino's efforts to reach an agreement with Longmeadow that is similar to other agreements accepted by communities including Ludlow, East Longmeadow and Agawam, among others.
Mathis said he does not believe Longmeadow will be impacted more than these communities.
"We do not accept that Longmeadow will be significantly and adversely impacted as we understand the operative standard," he writes. "Nonetheless, we have attempted to work in good faith with Longmeadow... ."
Mathis goes on to question whether it is pointless to negotiate with the town.
"We have repeatedly heard that it is pointless to attempt to negotiate a surrounding communities agreement with Longmeadow as it is a common perception that the leadership of your community is unconcerned with the resurgence of Springfield or the economic development that we are attempting to bring to the Western Massachusetts region, and will only use this process to frustrate the progress of our proposal," he wrote.
MGM is currently offering Longmeadow a preliminary, and standard, deal of $25,000 in up-front costs, and $75,000 annually.
The town argues that it will be adversely affected, particularly by any traffic directed off Interstate 91. Crane, who has worked closely with Select Board Chair Marie Angelides and town counsel to negotiate an agreement, said the town will be submitting a counter offer to the casino's current agreement in the next few days.
"We have been straight with them the whole time and have not slow walked this process," Crane said. "So much of our analysis was reliant on data MGM had to provide and that is why it seems to have dragged on forever," he said.
Crane also said MGM has 30 days after submitting its application to come to agreements with surrounding communities.
"I think they may have made the deadlines seem closer than they actually are and put some undue pressure on communities to accept the agreements," he said.
In his letter, Mathis goes on to point at the "conduct of certain members of your Select Board and a recent Town Meeting vote" as further reasons why Longmeadow has not accepted the agreement.
While the town voted not to support a casino in Springfield, the Select Board as a whole has not taken an official position on the casino. However, Grant has been actively opposed to a casino coming into the area and expresses his opposition in his letter.
Angelides said she is disappointed in Grant's decision to send the letter and sign it as a member of the board.
"I am disappointed that an individual member of the board responded to official correspondence addressed to the whole board," she said. "The Select Board voted to hire a legal firm to handle the communications and negotiations with MGM."
Angelides said the board has spent several months preparing for the negotiations and it was not the right time for Grant to express his personal views.
In his letter, Grant responded to Mathis by saying his personal feelings have nothing to do with whether Longmeadow should receive mitigation as a surrounding community. He also said he takes offense to the comment that he and others do not support the economic growth of Springfield.
"I reject your suggestion that I, and many other people who feel as I do, such as the majority of voters in West Springfield, are 'unconcerned about the resurgence of Springfield,' or 'economic development of Western Massachusetts' ... The people of Longmeadow, West Springfield and the other surrounding communities have cared about Springfield long before MGM came to town. We work in Springfield, we patronize local businesses in Springfield, and we give money and time to institutions that support Springfield," he wrote.
As for the town's vote against a casino, Grant said it is the town's right under the Gaming Commission's statute that the views of surrounding communities be considered in awarding the license.
You can read the letter from Mathis and MGM's proposed community agreement in the first document below; in the second document is the text of Grant's letter to Mathis:
MGM Springfield letter and surrounding community agreement proposal to Longmeadow 12-13-2013 by masslive
Longmeadow
Selectman Alex Grant Letter to MGM by masslive