Three months after ordering the date of Holyoke Public Schools review be moved up, the top education official in the state has asked the board of education to vote on receivership.
FITCHBURG -- Three months after ordering the date of Holyoke Public Schools review be moved up, the top education official in the state has asked the board of education to consider receivership for the district.
"I'm going to ask this board to take a vote on receivership," Education Commissioner Mitchell Chester said at the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education monthly meeting on Tuesday.
He held off on sharing a recommendation on whether he'd like the district to be placed in receivership or stay under local control. Chester said he will share his opinion after he has a chance to hear more public comment on the issue.
"I take local control very seriously. This is a cherished idea in Massachusetts," he said. "I do this only having considered very thoroughly the likelihood of benefits."
While Chester can ask the board to vote on receivership and share his preferred outcome, the board ultimately decides who will control Holyoke Public Schools by the state of the 2015-16 school year.
At Tuesday's meeting, board members discussed the recent review of Holyoke schools and shared concerns about both outcomes.
Board Member David Roach brought up the relationship between school administrators and union leadership, which the review team said is hindering progress.
"The changes initiated in Holyoke are intended to be substantive and sweeping," the report reads. "However, progress in advancing district initiatives is being slowed by an absence of meaningful teacher involvement and constructive participation by the Holyoke Teachers' Association. Further, to date little data demonstrates the initiatives' impact on student achievement."
"If we don't see any effort to collaborate it really doesn't leave us any options," Roach said. "Improvement doesn't come out of a non-collaborative effort."
He added, "I would identify that as the most troubling issue."
Other board members asked about the Holyoke school community's thoughts on receivership and how that compared to Lawrence before the district was placed in receivership.
Like in Holyoke, Chester said the Lawrence School Committee and teachers union opposed receivership. Then-Mayor William Lantigua was in support of a state takeover when the board approved the action. Unlike Lawrence leadership, Holyoke Mayor Alex B. Morse spoke of the importance of local control in his state of the city last month.
Board Member James O'S. Morton, of Springfield, brought up the walkout at Holyoke High School that occurred during their meeting.
"We're hearing now that some Holyoke students are opposed to it," Morton said at approximately 9:45 a.m., a half-hour after some Holyoke High students walked out of school. "Were students in Lawrence opposed to it as well?"
Chester said he didn't know.
Former chairwoman of the board Margaret McKenna shifted the conversation to district employee retention. "If we takeover receivership, will everyone have to reapply for their jobs?" she asked.
Not exactly, Chester said. The law allows for them to do so, but this wasn't the action taken for the entire district, only in a few schools.
McKenna said regardless of the board's decision she hopes many Holyoke teachers stay on. "When I looked at them, I was extremely encouraged," she said. Citing data from the HPS review she said, "99 percent of teachers knew their content. That's extremely high."
Even in very underperforming districts, Chester said he has never visited a school where he hasn't met fantastic teachers and that individual teachers are not representative of the district at a larger level.
He added that approximately two-thirds of Lawrence teachers are still with the district, despite longer work days and new employment contracts.
At a recent Reclaim Our Schools meeting, several Holyoke teachers said they - and their colleagues - are looking for new jobs, fearing they will lose their current positions.
Several board members asked the commissioner and Rob Curtin, whose department conducted the review, where they saw "pockets of excellence."
Curtin said the review team considers Superintendent of Schools Sergio Paez's office as an "area of strength." He said such improvements come with Paez filling the position in the summer of 2013 and also from the district following the state's excellerated improvement plan.
Crediting district success to the state and other comments by state officials, angered a Holyoke School Committee member in attendance.
When Curtin said the state hasn't heard from the Holyoke business community on this issue, Ward 7 School Committee member Erin Brunelle interjected. She told the board that the Greater Holyoke Chamber of Commerce did send a letter in support of local control, detailing concerns of how receivership would affect the local economy.
This comment, and several others led the newly appointed chairman Paul Sagan to bang his gavel multiple times and ask her to "be respectful."
Brunelle said she was correcting errors being presented to the board. "Information being relayed is false."
Sagan said, "You will not be recognized. You will be asked to leave if you keep speaking." He asked Brunelle to sit down, which she refused to do. She continued to stand in the back of the room for the rest of the discussion.
Brunelle was one of several Holyoke schools representatives in attendance. Paez, Assistant Superintendent Paul Hyry-Dermith and Director of Student Services Gina Roy attended the meeting. Holyoke Teachers Association President Gus Morales was also in attendance, as were a few other teachers.
Morales said other teachers had planned to take personal days to attend the meeting but felt deterred by comments made by Paez encouraging the school community to stay silent during the meeting.
With the commissioner's recommendation for the board to consider receivership, the board will take several weeks to weigh their options. Before the vote, there will also be a public forum held to discuss the issue. A date for the public forum has not yet been set.
As her final comment before leaving, Brunelle asked the board to "please hold it in Western Massachusetts."
Regarding the vote they need to consider, Sagan said to his fellow board members, "Do we believe that the current path has a chance of getting to the result we want for the children fast enough? We're going to examine that and debate that."
He added, "On average, the results are simply not acceptable and the rate is simply not acceptable."