'Harm' OCD causes those who suffer from it to suffer 'unwanted, intrusive thoughts' of a violent and sometimes sexual nature.
SPRINGFIELD - A federal judge stayed an order by the state that a student return to a private school in Westfield on Sept. 1 after telling a teacher last spring that he felt urges to stab and rape her, according to court records.
The judge also set a deadline for the state to determine the boy's academic future.
The dispute played out in U.S. District Court during a daylong hearing on Friday, after lawyers for White Oak School filed a motion on Monday asking for a temporary restraining order to keep the student from re-enrolling. The student, then 17, had been attending the school for years and was characterized as a polite, respectful boy until he was diagnosed with a rare form of obsessive-compulsive disorder called "Harm OCD."
The condition causes those who suffer from it to suffer "unwanted, intrusive thoughts" of a violent and sometimes sexual nature. A symptom of the disorder can include a compulsion to blurt out the fears to other people, according to clinicians and lawyers in the case. This is what occurred on April 2 when the student, a Longmeadow resident, told a teacher of his mental turmoil while the two were in a classroom alone.
"He ... stated that he had sexual feelings that had taken control of him. He then informed the teacher that he wanted to rape and stab her, and that he could not stop himself," the plaintiff's complaint reads. "When the teacher turned to leave the room, (the student) came closer to her and then fell to the ground, apparently suffering a seizure," reads a complaint filed by lawyers for the school.
Most clinicians agree that those who suffer from the disorder rarely if ever act out on their thoughts.
White Oak School caters to around 60 students grades 4 through 12 with "language-based learning disabilities." A lawyer for the school argued in the original motion for a restraining order that the facility does not have the clinical resources or proper staff to handle a student with this boy's impairment.
During Friday's hearing, Peter Smith, an attorney for the student and his parents, asked U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni to issue an impoundment order and seal all the documents related to the case. However, court filings by lawyers from both sides had previously been public and are the basis for stories in The Republican and on MassLive.
The documents filed in connection with the case are no longer publicly available. But, arguments were held in open court.
Many of the facts and the fundamental question of whether the student poses a real threat to anyone else were hotly contested during the hearing. Lawyers at times became emotional and Mastroianni asked Smith to "step it back" at one point during his arguments.
Since the episode at the school in April, the boy has not returned and school officials say he was "terminated." They provided at-home tutoring, financed by the Longmeadow school system, and sought an alternative placement for the student, according to court filings. School officials suggested Valley West School in Chicopee, which caters to students with emotional and social struggles. But, the parents resisted and Smith argued in court that although Valley West is a good school, it is not a good fit in this instance.
"It's a wonderful school ... perhaps the best in the commonwealth for students with emotional needs ... but absolutely inappropriate for this student," Smith told Mastroianni, adding that being placed there may actually exacerbate underlying anxiety issues the boy has.
Smith also argued that an additional allegation that the student expressed similar frightening thoughts to a friend and former White Oak classmate was overblown, at best, and suggested the teacher's rendition of what transpired also was exaggerated. Smith said the boy and the former classmate had made amends and were having lunch as the hearing unfolded.
Roderick MacLeish, a lawyer for the school, countered that the teacher who encountered the boy and his violent thoughts in the spring was "a veteran teacher," and "no shrinking violet." He said she was formerly a teacher in a tough school in Bronx, New York, and had never before been afraid of a student.
"There's been an underestimation of the severity of this disorder," by the defendants, MacLeish argued. "How can we say that this is not something that would not lead to violence? We simply cannot say that."
MacLeish also told Mastroianni that the case had been in the hands of the state Bureau of Special Education Appeals for months. He said a state expert had not been out to visit the school or interview its staff, which prompted delays in the case and put off previously scheduled hearings to vet the matter.
School officials argued they were essentially blind-sided by a "stay put" order recently issued by the state agency which mandated that the boy return to White Oak on Sept. 1. MacLeish argued that private schools should not be subject to such orders; but, that is still a point of contention in the case.
Mastroianni initially told the attorneys that he was reluctant to intervene in a case that was subject to pending administrative hearings by a state agency. He also questioned what led to the delays in the case.
"I'm wondering how and why these hearings weren't scheduled until August? This was just a ticking time bomb with time just falling off the calendar," Mastroianni said. "And now here we are."
Ultimately, Mastroianni denied the school's motion for a temporary restraining order, but issued a stay on the state's "stay put" order. He said that although the boy had not acted on his disturbing remarks, they were ongoing, according to the student's clinicians. Mastroianni also said he was concerned for the student in question.
"The student himself experiences a significant amount of stress related to this entire process," Mastroianni said, adding that the boy seems "insightful" and worrying aloud that returning to White Oak could be more detrimental than helpful.
However, he also found that there was "a likelihood of (emotional) injury" to other students who may be subjected to similar disclosures by the boy in the future. The student will not be returning to White Oak on Sept. 1. But, Mastroianni set a Sept. 24 deadline for the state appellate body to hold hearings and make findings in the case to determine the boy's academic future. In the interim he ordered that the student receive at-home tutoring that mirrors the school's curriculum.
The judge also ordered that the Sept. 24 deadline would not be lifted without express permission from the court. If the date approaches and all parties are not on track, Mastroianni warned:
"There's going to have to be a pretty good reason," he said.