MGM Springfield officials are expected to make an in-depth presentation about the design changes to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission on Nov. 19.
Traffic at the MGM Springfield casino is expected to drop by between 5 and 8 percent a day, or around 1,100 fewer car trips, due to design changes, according to project traffic engineer Kevin Dandrade.
"Which is the chicken and which is the egg?" Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Stephen Crosby asked Dandrade at a commission meeting on Thursday. "Did the expected reduced use drive a reduction in space or does your voluntary decision to reduce space have the consequences of reducing use?"
MGM Springfield officials said they will answer Crosby's question, and others like it, at the commission's next meeting on Nov. 19, when casino operators will make an in-depth presentation about the design changes.
Gaming Commissioner Bruce Stebbins said the commission and MGM officials will talk then about changes to jobs, revenue and capital expenditures. They will discuss the reasons behind the changes and their details.
"I know you have (questions)," said Jed Nosal, an attorney with Brown Rudnick who represents MGM Springfield. "We're respectful of those. We've been working very hard to make sure we present this in a comprehensive way to answer those questions completely in a way that puts everything into context."
Nosal said one area to be addressed is why MGM Springfield chose to drastically reduce the space for administrative and "back of the house" functions.
"It's funny to me that you can just willy nilly drop 25 percent in your back of house space," Crosby said. "Either somebody was sloppy in building the plans to begin with, which I doubt...or something's given up."
MGM Springfield is proposing numerous changes to the casino. These include reducing the size of a 25-story hotel tower to six stories, and moving it to a new location. MGM would move market-rate housing off the casino site, and shrink a planned parking garage by a floor, removing 387 parking spots.
MGM wants to decrease the size of the total development by 14 percent, including a significant cut in retail space, a smaller bowling alley and less space for movie theaters. The size of the site would drop from 15.6 acres to 14 acres, with 122,500 square feet less in building space, according to documents submitted to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.
Several Springfield city officials have voiced concern about the proposed changes. The Gaming Commission has asked for public comment.
The Gaming Commission must approve the changes for the project to go forward. If the commission does not approve, it can change the conditions of MGM's license or decide it has not met permitting requirements.
On Thursday, lawyers and consultants for MGM Springfield made a presentation focused narrowly on an environmental impact review process, which was triggered by the changes. The state agency overseeing the review under the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act is currently soliciting public comment and is expected to issue a decision by Nov. 18 on whether additional study is needed.
MGM Springfield officials say they are hopeful that no additional study will be required. The review process is generally meant to catch changes like road expansions that would cause more environmental impacts.
"The project actually is slightly reduced in scale, and the impacts are reduced in scale," said Margaret Briggs, managing principal at Epsilon Associates and an environmental consultant for MGM Springfield. "All the mitigation measures that were promised in the final environmental impact report are still agreed to."
MGM Springfield also recently met with the Springfield Historical Commission to discuss the proposed changes. Historical Commission Chairman Ralph Slate wrote to the Gaming Commission that the historical commission is generally satisfied. The issues that were discussed related to MGM's inability to reuse the United Electric building on State Street, and the impact of the relocation of the hotel on the facade of the adjacent Union House.
Slate did object to MGM's characterizations that historical preservation was responsible for a reduction in retail space rather than choices by MGM. "I consider it counterproductive to the consultation process to implicate historical preservation as a reason for the reduction in the scale of the project," Slate wrote.
Meanwhile, MGM Springfield also submitted a new site plan to the Springfield Office of Planning and Development, which was deemed incomplete. Once MGM resubmits the application, the City Council will hold a hearing and will need to approve the new plans.
Crosby said the Gaming Commission has not decided whether to have its own public hearing on the changes. It may depend on the public hearing process in Springfield.
The casino is expected to open in September 2018.