Several Western Massachusetts lawmakers said the short time frame was not a major problem, since they were already familiar with earlier versions of the bills.
BOSTON - With five hours to go before the midnight end of the 2015-2016 legislative session, lawmakers had not yet seen a single one of four major bills that they hoped to vote on Sunday evening.
"It's certainly a concern, and it's less than ideal, but there's a little bit of a feel of the last night before a big term paper's due or the night before finals feel to it," said State Sen. Eric Lesser, D-Longmeadow. "It's just inevitable that a lot of the big complicated work doesn't end until there's a deadline."
Throughout Saturday and Sunday, the final days of the session, lobbyists, journalists and lawmakers filled the Statehouse halls. The Legislature took up veto overrides and passed a bill modernizing municipal laws. But for most of two days, there were only rumors leaking out from behind closed doors, where groups of six senators and representatives negotiated the final versions of major bills related to energy, economic development, non-compete agreements and ride-sharing regulations.
It is not unusual for major bills to come down to the wire. But significant differences between the centrist-leaning House and the more liberal-leaning Senate, combined with lawmakers leaving town for the Democratic and Republican national conventions during the last two weeks of the session, meant an even tighter time crunch than usual this year.
Senate President Stan Rosenberg, D-Amherst, said just before 8 p.m. that a last-minute rush is "always part of the excitement of the final couple of days that we have a lot of things in process."
"People are getting along very well, people are continuing to talk, decisions are being made, differences are being worked out," Rosenberg said.
The time crunch meant legislators who had to vote on the bills would have only hours to review the often technical pieces of legislation. However, several Western Massachusetts lawmakers said the short time frame was not a major problem, since they were already familiar with earlier versions of the bills that passed the House and the Senate. That familiarity would allow them to focus only on the differences between the two versions when the bills emerged from conference committees.
"We owe it to the taxpayers who pay our salary, we need to be familiar with the House and Senate bills and if there are differences, we need to be tracking those closely," said State Rep. John Velis, D-Westfield. "Would I rather have more time? 100 percent absolutely....But we owe it to taxpayers to be intimately familiar with all these bills."
Velis noted that lawmakers did recently slip a provision about a pilot program related to a mileage tax into a non-controversial road and bridge funding bill at the last minute. But Velis said he does not see that as a common move by conference committee members, and if a controversial provision does get slipped into a bill, he would push for more time to debate the bill. (House Speaker Robert DeLeo, D-Winthrop, has said he will not try to extend the session past the July 31 deadline.)
State Rep. William "Smitty" Pignatelli, D-Lenox, pointed out that the bills were already publicly debated in the House and Senate. Once a report emerges from a conference committee, lawmakers can only take a yes or no vote. They cannot amend it further.
"I wish we had more time to look at these things but knowing the magnitude and what these bills are, I'm not overly concerned," Pignatell said. "We've already debated in the House, we know what's in the bill, we know what the Senate's done."
"When it comes back to us, it's yes or no, there's nothing we can change," Pignatelli said. "We put our faith in the conferees to do what they think is best."
Lesser, who handed out Hershey's kisses and Starburst candy on the floor to lawmakers as the evening dragged on, agreed with his colleagues that lawmakers were already familiar with the details of the House and Senate versions of the bills. "It's important for people to appreciate if you've prepared correctly, you're not just walking into the day blind," Lesser said.
State Rep. Todd Smola, R-Warren, the ranking Republican on the powerful Ways and Means Committee, said the committee is careful to review the language of every bill to know what is actually in there before it gets voted on. "One thing we won't do is vote on a piece of legislation just for the sake of legislating without knowing what's in it," Smola said.
"It is what it is on the last day," Smola said. "It's not the greatest situation, but we simply have to deal with what we've got in front of us."
State Sen. Jim Welch, D-West Springfield, said each bill has taken "many hours of work and many months of crafting" to get to the final version. In the Senate, he said, there is generally a caucus before votes, where lawmakers are briefed on the contents of a bill. "We have a very open and continuous dialogue of what changes are made, so everybody is comfortable, and we have the opportunity to raise any questions or concerns as the process unfolds," Welch said.
State Rep. Angelo Puppolo, D-Springfield, said while the timing is tight, lawmakers are up against a deadline, and the most important thing is to get the bills passed. "I'd certainly want to see what's going to be in the final report, but I'm willing to plug through and read as much as we can to get the bill done, as opposed to not getting the bill done," Puppolo said.