The Massachusetts Democratic State Committee on Tuesday passed a resolution opposing a ballot question that would expand access to charter schools.
The Massachusetts Democratic State Committee on Tuesday passed a resolution opposing a ballot question that would expand access to charter schools.
"Charter schools are actually interfering with the public school system in many ways," said Steven Tolman, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, who introduced the resolution.
The resolution passed on a voice vote, with only a handful of Democrats dissenting, according to several people who attended the meeting in Lawrence. Around 270 of approximately 400 state committee members were present.
"It was deafening support for the resolution, with a smattering of voices not in favor of the resolution," said Democratic State Committee Vice Chairwoman Debra Kozikowski of Chicopee.
But opponents of charter school expansion say the vote was not reflective of the level of support for charter schools in the Democratic Party. They said the resolution was not on the agenda in advance, and while there was some discussion of procedure, there was no substantive debate on the policy.
"The (U.S.) president, the (Massachusetts) House, the voters, the data are all on the side of charters," said Liam Kerr, Massachusetts state director of Democrats for Education Reform, a pro-charter school group. "But when it comes to things like a sleepy August meeting of the Democratic State Committee ... sure, the (Massachusetts Teachers Association) can win there."
Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican who supports charter school expansion, said he supports the ballot question as a way to give all parents, including those in communities of color and underperforming school districts, the same choices he had, to send their children to the school of their choice.
"I find it disappointing that the Democratic Party, which I feel is full of a lot of people who believe in equal opportunity and giving everybody a chance, would choose to be against something that is so important -- especially to working-class families in underperforming schools districts," Baker said. "They deserve better and they deserve a 'yes' vote."
The question on the November ballot will ask voters to decide whether to allow the state Board of Education to approve up to 12 charter schools a year outside of an existing cap, with priority given to the lowest-performing school districts.
The resolution that passed the Democratic State Committee lays out many of the arguments against charter school expansion. It argues that charter schools divert money from traditional public schools, typically serve fewer students who have special needs or are learning English, and are not accountable to local school committees. The resolution says the ballot initiative could nearly triple the number of charter schools in 10 years, would drain more money from public schools and is contrary to the national Democratic platform.
The resolution says the charter school campaign "is funded and governed by hidden money provided by Wall Street executives and hedge fund managers." The ballot initiative, it says, "would lead Massachusetts in the wrong direction."
Proponents of charter schools argue that charter schools are public schools, are accountable to the state, and have been educating hard-to-serve children. They say expanding access to charter schools gives students more choices, particularly in failing school districts. The pro-charter ballot campaign is funded heavily by the financial industry, just as the anti-charter ballot campaign is funded primarily by unions.
Tolman said he introduced the resolution because it is an important issue. "It was passed almost unanimously in a very democratic process," Tolman said.
He argued that charter schools are draining money from public schools, they weed out troubled students and they failed in their original purpose of developing new strategies that can be replicated in public schools. "They're almost like a runaway train. That great idea of bringing innovation back to public schools never happened," Tolman said.
Committee Chairman Thomas McGee, a state senator from Lynn, called it "an issue that's been on people's minds for a long time."
"Raising the cap clearly was something that concerned an overwhelming majority of the party," McGee said.
McGee said anyone is allowed to bring up an item in a section of the meeting reserved for new business, even if it was not on the agenda, and Democratic activists were familiar with the issue because of the ongoing debate. He said committee members decided to suspend their rules and vote on the resolution, after some discussion.
"It's an ongoing issue people are very familiar with, and they felt it was important to take a stand on it," McGee said.
Kozikowski said areas like Springfield have struggled to improve their public schools. "Privately run schools where you cherry pick the best and the brightest of those individuals and leave others behind isn't the way to improve public schools," Kozikowski said.
"We didn't say we're against all charter schools," Kozikowski added. "What we said is we're not supporting lifting the cap at this time."
The Democratic State Committee is not committing to spending money or working on behalf of the ballot campaign, although individual members may do so.
Opponents of charter school expansion say they believe Democrats are more divided on the issue than the vote indicates.
The meeting, Kerr said, "did have the feeling of a smoke-filled room but without the smoke." He said union members were pushing the issue, without putting it on the agenda in advance and without having significant debate.
"We had people coming up to us quietly, saying we're with you, but there's no point. It's a symbolic vote," Kerr said.
Eileen O'Connor, a spokesman for the pro-charter school ballot committee, Great Schools Massachusetts, said, "We're thrilled that public charter schools have such strong bipartisan support from elected leaders on both sides of the aisle, and are part of the recently ratified national platform of the Democratic Party. Providing great public education options for the kids and parents that need them most is a goal shared by leaders of both parties."
She pointed to state Sen. Michael Rodrigues, D-Westport, and state Rep. Frank Moran, D-Lawrence, as examples of Massachusetts Democrats who support the ballot question.
The national Democratic Party platform says Democrats support "high-quality public charter schools," as long as the charter schools are not for profit, reflect the demographics of their communities and do not destabilize public schools.
The Republican reporter Shannon Young contributed to this story.