Cara Rintala, 49, is accused of strangling Cochrane Rintala, 37, in the couple's Granby home on March 29, 2010.
NORTHAMPTON -- A prosecutor on Monday described Cara Rintala as a devious woman who made a mess of her efforts to hide her murder of wife Annamarie Cochrane Rintala.
Assistant District Attorney Steven Gagne told jurors in his closing argument that Rintala was "going off the rails" after she strangled her wife. Rintala staged a break-in and sent a flurry of text messages and phone calls to her wife, even though she knew her wife was dead, Gagne said.
Defense lawyer David Hoose said the prosecution is trying to say Rintala killed her wife, then coldly took her daughter out to do errands to try to create an alibi. He said the prosecution contends Rintala poured paint on Cochrane Rintala to try to cover up the crime.
Summarizing the things the prosecution said Rintala did, Hoose said, "The worst psychopaths in the history of criminal justice couldn't do that."
Rintala, 49, is accused of killing Cochrane Rintala, 37, in the couple's Granby home on March 29, 2010. This is Rintala's third murder trial in the case, following mistrials in 2013 and 2014 resulting from deadlocked juries. She has been free on $150,000 bail since March 2014.
Gagne said video surveillance from various locations on the afternoon of the killing showed objects in the back of Rintala's truck -- objects he said were evidence that Rintala got rid of.
The prosecutor reminded jurors that, when they were selected, they promised they would follow the judge's instructions to decide on proof beyond a reasonable doubt, not proof beyond all doubt. He said there is no reasonable doubt Rintala killed her wife.
Hoose said there were definite signs of a struggle in the basement where Cochrane Rintala was found. He said Rintala, who had no injuries, could not have engaged in a struggle with the much larger Cochrane Rintala without injuries.
Gagne said Cochrane Rintala went down the basement stairs, sustaining head injuries. What little fight she had left in her, Gagne said, she used to try to pry Rintala's fingers off her throat.
Hoose said blood spatter on the basement floor contained Cochrane Rintala's DNA and DNA from another person who was not Rintala.
Gagne said no blood-covered intruder fled from the house. Rintala stayed there and cleaned up before she went out, he contended.
The prosecution's two experts said Cochrane Rintala was dead four to six hours before first responders arrived. That means Rintala was home at the time of the death, Gagne said.
Hoose said the defense's two experts testified no one can say whether the death was before or after 2:30 or 3 p.m., when Rintala went out.
Gagne said he did not dispute that Rintala and Cochrane Rintala loved each other, but said theirs was a volatile and unhealthy relationship.
Hoose said the prosecution introduced only texts and testimony about the problems between the two spouses. He said other texts and testimony would have showed a loving relationship. He said the two women separated for six to eight weeks but got back together in November 2009. They went to counseling and to church and were working on their relationship.
The women did have issues and they would say mean things to each other, Hoose said, but 10 minutes later "they're out on the beach having a good time."
The names of Mark Oleksak and Carla Daniele were brought up in Hoose's closing argument. They are two people the defense has contended should have been investigated as possible killers.
"I am not trying to convince you that Mark Oleksak or Carla Daniele committed this murder. I have no idea. But neither do they," Hoose said, indicating the prosecution.
Oleksak, a close friend and colleague of Cochrane Rintala, had $7,000 of her debt on his credit card, Hoose said. Daniele was a former girlfriend of Cochrane Rintala, according to testimony.
After closing arguments, the jury heard instructions from Hampshire Superior Court Judge Mary-Lou Rup. They were slated to begin deliberations Monday.
Before the jury was brought into the courtroom Monday morning, Rup said she would instruct them on the law around voluntary manslaughter, as well as first- and second-degree murder.
Gagne asked for the voluntary manslaughter instruction, and the defense objected to it.
The juries in Rintala's last two trials did not have the option of considering voluntary manslaughter as a verdict. In this case, they can decide on conviction for first- or second-degree murder or manslaughter, or acquittal.