Mayor Alex B. Morse and City Council President Kevin A. Jourdain will debate whether Massachusetts should legalize marijuana for recreational use at a forum on Oct. 25, 2016 about questions that will be on the Nov. 8 election ballot. The forum will be 6 to 8 p.m. at Dean Technical High School, 1045 Main St.
HOLYOKE -- Mayor Alex B. Morse and City Council President Kevin A. Jourdain will debate whether Massachusetts should legalize marijuana for recreational use at a forum on Oct. 25 about questions that will be on the Nov. 8 election ballot.
The forum will be 6 to 8 p.m. at Dean Technical High School, 1045 Main St.
Holyokers will face a ballot on Election Day that, along with the presidential race, will include four statewide ballot questions and one local question. Republican Party nominee Donald Trump and Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton are the major party candidates in the presidential election.
The forum will include presentations about two of the statewide questions -- on whether to increase the number of permitted charter schools and whether to legalize, regulate and tax pot for recreational use -- and the local question, which will ask whether Holyoke should adopt the state Community Preservation Act (CPA).
Organizers of the forum have contacted representatives of groups that support and oppose the other two statewide ballot questions about at least staffing information tables at the forum, said Nelson R. Roman, Ward 2 representative on the City Council.
Roman is organizing the forum with the neighborhood associations for South Holyoke, Churchill and the Ingelside-Springdale, along with Neighbor to Neighbor, a group that pushes for affordable housing, he said.
The other two statewide ballot questions will ask voters whether to permit a second slot machines gaming venue in Massachusetts and whether to phase out certain farm animal confinement methods.
The forum will begin at 6:30 p.m. with a representative of Great Schools Massachusetts arguing in favor of the increase in charter schools and a representative of Save Our Public Schools arguing against approval of that question, Roman said.
At 7 p.m., Morse and Jourdain will debate the marijuana question.
"As I considered this question it became increasingly clear that I could no longer tolerate a system that results in disproportionate arrests of African-Americans and other minority groups and, frankly, has failed for decades to limit the availability of marijuana," Morse said in a statement Aug. 1.
SUBMITTED IMAGE
The City Council Sept. 21 referred this order filed by Jourdain to its Public Safety Committee:
"City Council adopt a resolution in Opposition to the Legalization of the Recreational Use of Marijuana in Massachusetts and send a letter to our State Delegation and the Governor to this effect."
Jourdain said last month, "We already allow the medical use of marijuana in Massachusetts. Promoting the recreational use of drugs of any kind is bad public policy and will lead to disastrous consequences of more kids being hooked on drugs. Many people are the victims of violent crime and property crime because of drugs. Making recreational use of marijuana legal in Massachusetts will only strengthen the criminal element in our community and lead to more people using drugs."
At 7:30 p.m., a representative of Yes For a Better Holyoke will argue in favor of adoption of the CPA. Roman said he in touch with a newly formed group opposing adoption of the CPA, No on 5, about sending a representative to the forum.
Debate has featured supporters who said the Community Preservation Act (CPA) would produce a helpful revenue stream vs. foes who said it merely would be the burden of another tax.
Adoption of the CPA would establish funding by assessing a surcharge on property owners which, combined with matching state money, could be used for projects related only to open space, historic restoration or affordable housing.
State law permits adoption of the CPA with a surcharge of 1 percent to 3 percent on a property tax bill. In other words, property owners would be charged an additional 1 percent to 3 percent of the tax bill that they pay to the city to fund the CPA.
But exemptions can reduce the burden such as excluding the first $100,000 of a property's value from the surcharge and providing exclusions for senior citizens and the poor.
CPA supporters said the key is cities and towns that adopt the act get matching money from the state that is otherwise unavailable to communities that fail to adopt the CPA to allow for completion of projects the city currently cannot afford.
Specifically, the question Holyokers will see on the ballot will ask if they are agreeable to the city adopting the CPA that would impose a surcharge on property taxpayers of 1.5 percent of the tax bill they pay to the city.
Supporters of the 1.5 percent surcharge say that the average homeowner in Holyoke would pay $23 a year with adoption of the CPA and the exemptions. But foes dispute that and say the cost paid by many property owners would be more than $23 a year.
Opponents of the city adopting the CPA said that taxpayers cannot afford to pay more and that the measure would be an unfair expense because only property owners would be paying more but the whole city would receive the benefits.