A committee of experts told lawmakers on Thursday that salaries for the state's highest public officials should be increased.
BOSTON -- A committee of experts told lawmakers on Thursday that salaries for the state's highest public officials should be increased.
"Compensation for the most important public officials in the Commonwealth is outdated and inadequate and needs to be adjusted to better conform to responsibilities," said Ira Jackson, vice provost of UMass Boston and a former state revenue commissioner, who chaired the 2014 Special Advisory Commission Regarding the Compensation of Public Officials.
The commission, a group of nonpartisan experts, released a report Dec. 1, 2014. The report looked at elected officials' salaries, considering factors such as job responsibilities, the ability to attract talented individuals, comparisons with public officials in other states and with private sector jobs, cost of living and the impact on state finances.
The report concluded that the current compensation structure for constitutional officers and legislative leaders "is generally outdated and inadequate." The report recommended large pay hikes to the salaries of the governor, House speaker and Senate president.
But lawmakers never acted on the report when it came out. More than two years later, the Committee on Ways and Means held a public hearing on the report, indicating that lawmakers are now deciding whether to raise salaries for state lawmakers and elected officials.
State Sen. Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, said she hopes having an open, public process will "help produce a more well-rounded perspective."
The cost of implementing all of the report's recommendations would be $934,300 a year.
The report recommends raising the governor's salary to $185,000, plus a housing allowance of $65,000, compared to the current $151,800.
Jackson said Thursday that the governor is CEO of a $36.5 billion organization with 136,000 employees.
"The governor's job is singularly important, demanding, high profile and certainly 24/7," Jackson said. Yet, he noted, 1,254 state employees earn more than the governor -- a number that swells to 2,000 when overtime pay is included.
Those earning more than the governor include every member of the governor's cabinet.
Massachusetts is also one of just six states not to offer their governor an official residence.
"Unless increased, the current compensation for governor can serve as an impediment to attracting a diverse pool of talented candidates who are representative geographically and socioeconomically of the public who the governor is sworn to serve," Jackson said.
The report recommends paying the attorney general and treasurer $175,000 a year; and the secretary of state, auditor and lieutenant governor $165,000 a year. Currently, those positions pay between $122,000 and $135,000 annually.
Attorney General Maura Healey, for example, earns less than most first-year associates at prominent Boston law firms.
The commission recommends increasing salaries of the House speaker and Senate president to $175,000, from the current $102,233. The current figure includes a base salary of $60,033, a $35,000 stipend for the leadership positions and a $7,200 stipend for office supplies.
Mike Widmer, former president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation and a member of the compensation committee, acknowledged that there is "rarely if ever a good time" politically for lawmakers to increase their leaders' pay. But he noted the additional $35,000 stipend awarded to the House and Senate leaders has been flat for 34 years. When adjusted for inflation, it should be $86,000.
Widmer said he would like to see the salaries for House and Senate leaders adjusted every two years according to a formula, the same way rank and file legislators' pay is adjusted. He said that would create "an appropriate and fair way to do this every other year, modestly and with a formula."
The commission recommended some reforms to accompany the pay raises, including banning outside employment by the constitutional officers, the House speaker and the Senate president, and eliminating the per diem travel expense given to lawmakers in exchange for raising office expense reimbursements with a bump for legislators living more than 50 miles from Boston.
Committee member Lynn Griesemer, executive director of the UMass Donahue Institute, said under the current pay structure, "You can only be a constitutional officer in this state if you have wealth, have a spouse who has wealth, or live in Boston already."
In 2014, as governor-elect, Baker said he opposed pay raises at a time when a budget deficit was forcing cuts to services.
Recently, Baker again made mid-year cuts to the state budget to keep it in balance. He is in the process of formulating his fiscal 2018 budget. Baker declined to comment on specific pay raise proposals.
"I think our message to the Legislature is that the lieutenant governor and I are fine with where we are, but we'll obviously take a look at anything that they pursue on their own and give it a good, solid review," Baker said earlier this week.
A Baker spokesman said the governor and Lt. Gov. Karyn Polito have no plans to accept pay raises, but Baker will review any legislation that reaches his desk.
Baker recently gave Massachusetts lawmakers a 4.2 percent pay raise, from $60,000 to $62,500, after a biennial review process in which legislative salaries are adjusted based on median household income, which was $70,600 in Massachusetts in 2015. Baker and Polito declined to accept their own raises.
The anti-tax group Citizens for Limited Taxation opposes the raises, noting that Massachusetts lawmakers' salaries are already the sixth-highest nationwide, even without considering additional pay for leadership and committee roles, expenses and per diem payments for travel.
Chip Faulkner, a spokesman for Citizens for Limited Taxation, on Thursday called the proposed jumps in pay "incredible" and far beyond what voters wanted when they approved a constitutional amendment in 1998 tying lawmakers' pay to median household income.
Additionally, Faulkner said, "Giving these raises...in the face of a budget deficit is just not kosher."
State Rep. Alan Silvia, D-Fall River, said in two terms in the Legislature, he has seen a dozen lawmakers leave for private practice or industry where they could make a better salary. "They left because they couldn't survive," Silvia said. "We need a living wage."
South Deerfield resident Tom O'Neil, a disabled businessman who previously ran Toyota dealerships, traveled to the Statehouse to testify against the pay raises.
"Folks like myself get x amount of dollars every year, and we have to take those dollars and stretch them to pay the electric bill," O'Neil said.
He said he would not oppose gradual pay raises for state officials, but the proposed hikes are too great for pay raises that will come from taxpayers' pockets.