Quantcast
Channel: News
Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live

Wrongful death civil suit against acquitted murder suspect Michael Sobers ends with $100 payment

$
0
0

Sobers' lawyer said his client is not guilty and does not acknowledge any guilt in the killing of Monalisa Barber of Westfield.

SPRINGFIELD – Michael Sobers, acquitted four years ago in the 2005 killing of Monalisa Barber in Westfield, has agreed to pay one of the woman’s daughters $100 to end a wrongful death civil suit against him.

John D. Ross III, the lawyer for Barber’s daughter Mimi Silver, said Barber’s family “took it as acknowledging he (Sobers) was civilly responsible for her death.”

Jeffrey S. Brown, lawyer for Sobers in the criminal murder trial and the Hampden Superior Court civil suit, said there was no such acknowledgment by Sobers in the civil matter.

“He didn’t admit to anything. He’s not guilty. He didn’t kill Monalisa Barber,” Brown said.

Ross, who said he handled the case for free, said the family believes the agreement shows Sobers admitted he is more than 50 percent responsible for Barber’s death, which is the way matters are judged in civil trials.

Brown said Sobers agreed to pay to end the suit but admitted no guilt because he is not guilty. Brown said many civil suits are ended with a payment short of trial for a variety of reasons, but usually for much more than $100.

The document in court files signed by both lawyers on behalf of their clients simply indicates Sobers pays $100 to Silver and the suit is ended.

Silver, in the wrongful death suit she filed in 2008 as administrator of Barber’s estate, asked for $5 million from Sobers..

The suit said the estate was entitled to the money for “expected income, service, protection, care, assistance, society, companionship, comfort and advice” of Monalisa Barber.

A Hampden Superior Court jury in June 2007 acquitted Sobers, then 22, of Springfield, of murder in the killing of the 44-year-old Barber in her apartment on Union Street in Westfield on March 3, 2005.

Then-Hampden District Attorney William M. Bennett said at the time he was very disappointed in the jury’s verdict, saying evidence of Sobers’ guilt was overwhelming.

The prosecutor at the trial told jurors Sobers was stealing money and prescription drugs from Barber when she surprised him, and he beat her and stabbed her to death.

Brown told the jury that Sobers found Barber dead – that someone else had committed the crime.

Sobers testified that he loved Monalisa Barber, and said that she had vehement arguments with her daughter Kathy Barber and the father of Kathy Barber’s baby.

Sobers was a personal care assistant for Monalisa Barber but had known her before he began that job.

Monalisa Barber suffered about 30 stab wounds and showed signs of having been beaten with several objects.


Former Massachusetts Transportation Secretary Jeffrey Mullan among 7 appointed as new UMass trustees

$
0
0

Mullan resigned as transportation secretary following reports that his department delayed notifying Gov. Patrick about a ceiling light collapse in one the Big Dig tunnels in Boston.

JeffreyMullan2009.jpgJeffrey Mullan

BOSTON – Gov. Deval L. Patrick has appointed seven members to the University of Massachusetts Board of Trustees, including his former transportation chief, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino’s former chief of staff and several Democratic loyalists.

Six of the seven are UMass graduates.

The new trustees include former state Transportation Secretary Jeffrey Mullan, Massachusetts Bar Association President Richard Campbell, former Menino chief of staff Alyce Lee, and Lawrence attorney Zoila Gomez.

Other appointees include Lawrence Carpman, who worked for Patrick’s campaign and has donated more than $2,100 to him, and Margaret Xifaras an attorney and so-called “superdelegate” to the 2008 Democratic National Convention where she backed Patrick’s pick for president, Barack Obama.

They replace trustees who have completed their five-year terms.

Patrick also reappointed James J. Karam, chairman of the UMass Board of Trustees. Karam has contributed $4,500 to Patrick.

Mullan resigned as transportation secretary following reports earlier this year that his department delayed notifying Gov. Patrick about a ceiling light collapse in one the Big Dig tunnels in Boston.

Franklin County town of Hawley struggling in wake of Tropical Storm Irene

$
0
0

Almost two weeks after Irene's destructive visit, the rural town of Hawley is still dealing with lack of roads and services.

Hurricane Irene aftermath in Franklin County, MassachusettsDamaged bridges, like this one on Route 112 leading into Colrain, make travel difficult for Franklin County residents as they try to resume a normal life after Tropical Storm Irene. (Photo by Robert Rizzuto / The Republican)

HAWLEY – The rural and remote Franklin County town of Hawley is still struggling to deal with the aftermath of Tropical Storm Irene, which flooded the valleys between the peaks that define the small municipality almost two weeks ago.

"We're not necessarily cut off from the rest of the world, but access is limited and has changed completely since two weeks ago," said Gregory Cox, the town's emergency management director and fire chief. "Everyone here has power back, but most have no phone service and several roads are completely gone."

One of them is Route 8A, which serves as a main thoroughfare between West Hawley and Route 2 in Charlemont. Cox said that a half-mile of that road was destroyed and although the state had a contractor working to repair it, work was stopped since Monday as the remnants of Tropical Storm Lee brought more rain to the region.

"We've had more than 8 inches of water since Monday and that has complicated everything," Cox said. "With the damaged and destroyed roads, what used to be a five-mile drive now is more like a 25-mile drive. God forbid we have a fire because even with our mutual aid agreement, no one can easily get here and some can't get here at all."

Gallery preview

The lack of access likely alarmed a group of 15 people who were attending a wedding at the Stump Sprout Guest Lodge. When Irene began dumping water on the area, roads washed out and phone service was cut, stranding the group at the lodge, Cox said.

"One of the guests climbed until he got cell service and called his mother in Maryland to let her know they were alright," Cox said. "She was worried and somehow ended up reaching the state police and eventually us. A bunch of us used supplies stockpiled in the town garage to rebuild enough of a makeshift road to get them out of there after the rain stopped."

Cox said the town's highway garage, which was new and recently paid off, sustained flooding damage following Irene's destructive visit. The water from the adjacent Chickley River swallowed more than 20 feet of land and a stone wall behind the garage, and now sits a few feet from the town's fuel storage unit.

"We have a fire truck sitting outside under a tarp and town equipment we can't house anywhere," Cox said. "The state has and is helping us but there is a lot of work to be done. Everyone is rushing to get roads repaired because we are in a higher elevation which means Winter comes early here. But this town likely won't be back to normal for at least the end of next Summer."

Calls to other town officials were unsuccessful on Thursday. Cox said that most people in Hawley are still waiting for the hardline phone infrastructure to be rebuilt and unless your on a peak rather than in a valley, cell phone service is not an option.

Former Massachusetts Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, convicted of corruption charges, pleads with judge for compassion

$
0
0

DiMasi did not admit guilt, but said he’s sorry for mistakes he made, for the pain he brought his family and the disgrace he brought the Legislature.

Salvatore DiMasi 9811.jpgFormer Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, center, arrives at the Federal courthouse in Boston, with his stepdaughter Ashley, left, and wife Debbie, right, Thursday. DiMasi arrived at court to attend a sentencing hearing after his recent conviction on federal corruption charges for using his power as speaker to help a software company win state contracts in exchange for secret payments.

BOSTON – Former Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi said he is a “broken man” who has lost everything that he worked for in his life.

DiMasi made an impassioned plea Thursday to U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf to spare him a lengthy prison sentence. He also asked to remain free while appealing his conviction.

Federal prosecutors are seeking a 12½ year sentence for DiMasi, convicted in June of using his clout as speaker to steer two lucrative state contracts to a software firm in exchange for kickbacks.

DiMasi did not admit guilt in the case, but said he’s sorry for mistakes he made, for the pain he brought to his family and the disgrace he brought to an institution – the Legislature – that he loved.

Wolf is scheduled to sentence DiMasi and co-defendant Richard McDonough on Friday.


More details coming on MassLive and in The Republican.

Holyoke fire causes extensive damage to building at Rock Valley Kennels

$
0
0

No people or animals were injured in the fire, which was contained to the house and did not reach the kennel area out back, a fire official said.

HOLYOKE - The main house at Rock Valley Kennels, 405 Rock Valley Road, sustained extensive damage from a Thursday afternoon fire, Fire Department spokesman Lt. Thomas Paquin said.

No people or animals were injured in the fire, which was contained to the house and did not reach the kennel area out back, he said.

Firefighters were called to the scene at about 2:45 p.m. for a reported fire. When they arrived, they could see heavy flames and smoke in the main house, he said.

Paquin said a kitchen area and a utility room were gutted, and the front porch was heavily burned.

It took firefighters 20 minutes to knock down the fire and another two hours extinguish any hot spots, he said.

The building cannot be occupied without repairs, he said.

Firefighters are unclear how the fire started, and are now investigating to determine the cause, he said.

The property is owned by Frank Jackson and Steve Turner.

Fire scene at 405 Rock Valley Road, Holyoke


View Larger Map

Wall Street: Stocks slide after Federal Reserve Board chairman Ben Bernanke offers no new stimulus plan

$
0
0

The Dow, which fell 100 points after Bernanke started speaking, ended the trading session 120 points down.

Bernanke 9811.jpgFederal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, left, smiles and moderator Tim Penny laughs during a question and answer session following Bernanke's address to the Economic Club of Minnesota Thursday in Minneapolis. Bernanke said he's surprised by how cautious consumers have been in the two years since the recession officially ended. But the Fed chief offered no hints of any steps the Fed would take to boost the weak economy.

NEW YORK – Stocks closed sharply lower Thursday after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke offered no new insight into whether the central bank will act soon to prop up the economy.

In a speech closely watched by investors, Bernanke said the Fed will consider a range of steps at its Sept. 20-21 meeting, but he offered no specific plans. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 100 points shortly after Bernanke’s remarks began at 1:30 p.m. Eastern.

“The implications are that the Fed is going to act, but the market is disappointed because he was a little short on details,” said Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James.

Concerns about the U.S. economy have pushed stocks lower each month since April. Many traders now say the stock market is pricing in the assumption that the economy is in a recession, meaning limited job growth and a weaker corporate profits.

President Obama plans lay out his jobs plan at a joint session of Congress Thursday night. He is expected to announce a $300 billion package that includes tax cuts, additional state aid and spending on infrastructure.

The Dow Jones industrial average lost 119.05 points, or 1 percent, to 11,295.81. The Standard & Poor’s 500-index fell 12.72, or 1.1 percent, to 1,185.90. The Nasdaq composite shed 19.80, or 0.8 percent, to 2,529.14. Each index had posted gains earlier in the day.

Cisco Systems Inc. led the 30 Dow stocks with a 2.6 percent gain. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp and Boeing Co. each fell 3 percent, pulling the average lower.

Investors received mixed economic data before the market opened. First-time applications for unemployment benefits rose last week to 414,000. Economists had expected 405,000. The prior week’s estimate of new claims was also revised higher.

The weekly report on unemployment applications is an important economic indicator for investors. Rising claims can add to concerns that the job market is stalled and the U.S. economy is headed for another recession. Applications need to fall below 375,000 to indicate sustainable job growth. Last week the government reported there was zero job growth in the U.S. economy in August.

Not all of the economic news Thursday was negative. American exports of cars, airplanes and other goods reached an all-time high in July, the Commerce Department reported. Economists said the jump in exports suggest future growth in the U.S. economy.

“The market is sitting around and trying to piece it all together, “said Rob Stein, the founder and global head of asset management at Astor Asset Management. “For all the volatility that we’ve had recently, the market is going nowhere.”

OpenTable Inc., a restaurant booking and review website, dropped 8 percent to $57.50 after Google Inc. announced it was buying OpenTable rival Zagat, a publisher of restaurant reviews in print and online. Pall Corp. slumped 10 percent, to $44.03, after the maker of filtration equipment reported earnings that fell far short of what analysts were expecting. Pall dropped the most of any stock in the S&P 500 index.

Yahoo Inc. jumped 6 percent to $14.44 after Third Point, an activist investment fund, disclosed that it has bought a 5.2 percent stake in the troubled Web portal and called for sweeping changes to the board. Yahoo’s board fired CEO Carol Bartz on Tuesday after 2 1/2 years on the job. She harshly criticized the board in an interview published Thursday.

Four stocks fell for every one that rose on the New York Stock Exchange. Volume was lower than average at 3.7 billion shares.

Heads up: Falling NASA satellite has 1 in 3,200 chance of hitting someone upon re-entry

$
0
0

NASA says the 6-ton Atmosphere Research Satellite could fall anywhere between Juneau, Alaska and the tip of South America when it re-enters the earth's atmosphere over the next few weeks.

UARS_COVER1.jpgA NASA drawing of the 6-ton UARS satellite in orbit above the earth. The satellite is expected to re-enter the atmosphere in late September or early October.

By SETH BORENSTEIN
AP Science Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A dead NASA satellite will soon fall to Earth, but the space agency says there is very little chance that a piece of it will hit someone.

NASA says the 20-year-old satellite will probably fall sometime between late September and October. Pieces of it could land anywhere in the six inhabited continents in a worldwide swath from south of Juneau, Alaska, to just north of the tip of South America. NASA scientists estimate a 1-in-3,200 chance a satellite part could hit someone. Most of it will burn up after entering Earth's atmosphere.

The 6-ton Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) ran out of fuel in 2005 and will fall uncontrolled out of orbit. Only about 1,200 pounds of metal should survive, NASA said.

This satellite is far smaller than the 135-ton Russian space station Mir, which fell to Earth in 2001 or the 100-ton Skylab that fell in 1979. Mir fell into the South Pacific, while Skylab hit the Indian Ocean and parts of sparsely populated western Australia. Because two-thirds of the Earth is ocean, space debris usually hits water

"Things have been re-entering ever since the dawn of the Space Age; to date nobody has been injured by anything that's re-entered," said NASA orbital debris chief Gene Stansbery. "That doesn't mean we're not concerned."

NASA now has a rule that the chance of any of its satellites hitting someone has to be more than 1 in 10,000. But UARS, which measured chemicals in the air, was launched in 1991 before that rule was adopted. The agency usually tries to put dead satellites into "a graveyard orbit" or steer them down to the ocean, Stansbery said. But there was not enough fuel in this one to fire engines that would move it to a higher orbit or steer it down safely.

The 1-in-3,200 odds of being hit pertain to any of the nearly 7 billion people on Earth. But any one individual's odds of being struck are about 1 in 21 trillion.

Space debris bigger than 5 tons doesn't often fall to Earth. But this will be the third time this year for something that big to reach Earth, according to Jonathan McDowell, a Harvard University astrophysicist who tracks objects in orbit.

The UARS satellite travels over a large band of Earth, avoiding only areas close to the poles. NASA calculates that when the satellite does fall it will scatter pieces over a 500-mile-wide region.

Stansbery said the agency doesn't know exactly when and where those will fall because it depends on the orientation of the satellite in the atmosphere, solar storm activity and other variables.

There probably is no hazardous material left in the falling pieces, but people should not touch any fallen satellite parts just in case, he said.

NASA will be tracking the satellite on a weekly and later daily basis until it falls.


In the Republican primary race for the White House, it's Mitt Romney vs. Rick Perry now, with plenty of differences

$
0
0

Romney’s campaign believes that Social Security is Perry’s biggest liability.

Romney Perry 9711.jpgFormer Massachusetts Gov. W. Mitt Romney, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, stand together before a Republican presidential candidate debate at the Reagan Library Wednesday, in Simi Valley, Calif.

The GOP presidential contest has quickly narrowed to a two-man race.

As Rick Perry and W. Mitt Romney jockey over their ability to defeat President Barack Obama, there are deepening fault lines between the two on Social Security, immigration, jobs and more that could shape the contest.

Their stylistic differences are as stark as their disagreements on substance. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, also is a former venture capitalist who is at his best when he’s talking about how to help businesses help the economy grow. Perry, the Texas governor, is a fiery, red-meat conservative who has already shown he loves to go on the attack – and isn’t afraid to go after his chief GOP rival.

Those contrasts have driven Romney’s campaign to fundamentally change a strategy that was previously aimed squarely at Obama. Until Perry jumped into the race and almost immediately displaced Romney as the front-runner, the former Massachusetts governor focused his public appearances and messaging on the president.

Now, instead of running a general election campaign in primary season, Romney will spend the early months trying to convince Republicans that Perry can’t beat Obama in November.

It will start with Social Security, an issue Romney’s campaign has decided is Perry’s biggest liability. Aides privately say they plan to make it a singular focus in the coming weeks.

“You say that by any measure, Social Security is a failure. You can’t say that to tens of millions of Americans who live on Social Security and those who have lived on it,” Romney said in Wednesday night’s debate, after he and Perry had already traded jabs over their jobs records earlier in the debate.

The Romney campaign has followed that with a steady stream of press releases, background material and on-the-record quotes assailing Perry as a career politician who is unelectable.

“If (Perry) were to win the nomination, the most interesting thing that it would prove is that God is a Democrat,” said Stuart Stevens, a top Romney strategist.

Romney has also started to take on Perry’s immigration record. Advisers say that could be the next front in the fight, largely because it could hurt Perry with the conservative base he relies on. As governor of a border state with problems related to illegal immigration, Perry has said a physical border fence isn’t necessary. Texas universities also allow the children of illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition rates.

Romney used a recent immigration address to emphasize his support for a fence on the southern border – and to highlight his veto of an in-state tuition bill in Massachusetts

But putting so much focus on such issues carries risks: They’re a distraction from the central, disciplined jobs-and-economy message that Romney has been pushing steadily for months. The economy is the issue most likely to drive voters in 2012.

Perry has already made clear that he will run primarily on his jobs record – Texas gained more than 1 million jobs during his tenure as governor. And he has taken almost every opportunity to go after Romney on the issue.

“Michael Dukakis created jobs three times faster than you did, Mitt,” Perry jabbed on the debate stage. And after Romney unveiled a 160-page economic recovery plan earlier this week, Perry’s campaign immediately put out a statement slamming it.

Speaking of his GOP opponents, Perry told Republicans in California on Thursday, “We got our differences and we’ll talk about them and what have you and hopefully in a very respectful way.” Most important, he said, “is we need to have a nominee that doesn’t blur the lines between themselves and the current resident of the White House.”

Perry’s message is aimed squarely at an angry GOP base that’s clearly hungry for a candidate who isn’t afraid of a fight. He’s willing to deliver strong rhetoric on issues like the death penalty, a subject that drew applause at the debate.

Romney, by contrast, is positioning himself as the technocratic, business-friendly candidate in the race. He is clearly most excited when he’s talking about what he calls his “business plan” for the country. The last time he was confronted with questions about Social Security, he ended up talking about corporations.

“Corporations are people, my friend,” he exclaimed in August at the Iowa State Fair, staring down a heckler in the crowd who wanted to know how Romney was going to protect citizens on Social Security instead of looking out for companies.

These contrasts are set to shape a primary race that’s still in its early stages, with more than four months before voters go to the polls in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. And the dynamic is likely to push out the myriad of other candidates who have spent brief periods in the spotlight in recent months.

Chief among them is Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, whose campaign has wobbled since she won a key test vote in Iowa in August. She’s lost top members of her campaign team – and the media attention that had raised her political profile. Perry clearly eclipsed her on stage on Wednesday, and his expected attractiveness in Iowa, where she must win, threatens to doom her candidacy.

Instead, Perry’s entry could turn Iowa, the leadoff caucus state, into a two-person showdown. Romney has been relatively quiet there so far, but aides say he could up the ante in the state.

“Perry has to win here,” said Doug Gross, who is undecided but was a top Romney supporter in 2008. “What Romney needs to do right now in Iowa is make sure that Perry can’t get a big win early.”

And Perry could find a footing in New Hampshire, as well, where Romney had been running largely unopposed but where many conservatives are still looking for an alternative candidate.

“People were really hungry for an alternative, and no one has filled that niche,” said Rich Killion, a New Hampshire-based strategist who was working for former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty until he dropped out of the race. “With Perry getting into the race, he’s completely filled that vacuum. And it is a two-man race.”

Still, there are months before the first votes are cast, and there are still two debates coming up in September alone. That leaves plenty of room for mistakes, and for Romney to start spending millions of dollars in an attempt to define Perry for voters who are just getting to know him.

“It’s important to remember that the first contest is five months away and anything can happen,” said Mike Dennehy, a longtime GOP strategist. “We shouldn’t’ write anyone off until the first votes are cast.”


Connecticut man pleads guilty to shooting Massachusetts dance instructor in murder-for-hire plot

$
0
0

Dorian Membreno, of Bridgeport, Conn., was charged in the 2010 shooting of Marybeth Banks, of Pembroke, who was seriously injured in the attack outside her home.

dorian.jpgDorian Membreno as pictured on his Facebook profile

BOSTON (AP) — A Connecticut man has pleaded guilty to shooting a Massachusetts dance instructor in a murder-for-hire plot.

Dorian Membreno, of Bridgeport, Conn., was charged in the 2010 shooting of Marybeth Banks, of Pembroke, who was seriously injured in the attack outside her home.

On Thursday, Membreno pleaded guilty to two federal charges: interstate travel in the commission of a murder-for-hire, and carrying, using or possessing a firearm in connection with a crime of violence. Sentencing was set for Dec. 8.

Prosecutors said Membreno was hired by Anthony DeJoseph III, a former boyfriend of Banks.

DeJoseph, of Wolcott, Conn., was sentenced in April in Connecticut to five years in prison on assault and gun charges stemming from two incidents, including a 2009 assault on Banks. The judge told DeJoseph he was still the target of a federal investigation.

Springfield mayoral candidates debate crime, education and finances

$
0
0

The Sept. 20 preliminary election will eliminate one of the three mayoral candidates.

antonette pepe domenic sarno jose tosado.jpgLeft to right, Springfield School Committee member Antonette Pepe, Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno and Springfield City Council President Jose Tosado.

SPRINGFIELD – The incumbent mayor and his two challengers sparred on issues ranging from the fight against crime to the challenges facing the Springfield school system during the first televised debate of the 2011 election this week.

The round-table debate was sponsored and videotaped Thursday in two, half-hour sessions by WGBY-57, and was to be broadcast Thursday and Friday nights. The debates featured Mayor Domenic J. Sarno and his challengers, School Committee member Antonette E. Pepe and City Council President Jose F. Tosado.

The preliminary election Sept. 20 will eliminate one mayoral candidate, while the top two vote-getters move on to the Nov. 8 election ballot.

Sarno repeatedly defended his efforts on the issues of crime, education and finances, citing difficult times as Pepe and Tosado said the effort was inadequate.

After Sarno spoke of the need for more parents to become more responsible for their children, in response to a question about public safety, Pepe said it was time to “stop whining about the parents.” She called more action, more police interaction with the neighborhoods, and for the police commissioner to be held accountable.

She said there has been “a lot of talk and a lot of cheerleading,”.

Sarno said his task force of new law enforcement agencies is getting results, including gun sweeps, gang sweeps and narcotics sweeps.

Tosado said Sarno’s record on crime is “horrendous,” and said he has a plan that includes proposals for a gun court and gun squad to focus on gun violence.

Referring to the mayor’s recent announcement of a “zero tolerance” policy on crime, Tosado asked: “What was it before.. 50 percent?”

On education, Sarno said there has been “pockets of success” but adding that more needs to be done. He said there has been headway in addressing truancy, praised the results of the Springfield Promise scholarship program, and said the schools must continue to reach out to parents and the community.

Both Pepe and Tosado were critical, saying that 10 of the 44 schools in Springfield are Level 4 underperforming schools and the school system if rife with problems. Both were critical of Superintendent of Schools Alan J. Ingram, who has announced he will resign at the end of his contract, June 30, 2012.

Tosado said he would call for a complete audit of the schools and how it spends its money, and said there is a need for more guidance counselors, and a greater effort to deal with the “whole student.”

Pepe said there is too much money spent on school administration and not enough done to reduce overcrowded classrooms and reduce counselor’s workloads.

Sarno said he has kept the city’s finances stable, including nearly $35 million in reserve funds and an improved credit rating with Wall Street despite the worse economic times since the Great Depression.

In addition, he said he has helped keep jobs in Springfield and bring new jobs, including tax incentives to help Titeflex and Smith & Wesson.

Tosado said he would focus on helping the small businesses of Springfield grow, and reducing crime to make Springfield more attractive to outside firms.

Pepe said the city must clean up crime to bring in business and needs to provide a one-stop process for businesses needing information and assistance.

While Sarno said the tax levy was lowered under his administration, Tosado said the reduction was small and was at the urging of the City Council. Pepe said the business tax rate is the highest in the state.

Sarno said there has been some headway on long-dormant projects such as Union Station and 31 Elm St., despite the poor economy.

While Pepe criticizing the sale of the old School Department headquarters at 195 State St. for $1, Sarno said the only other proposal for the vacant building was for subsidized housing, and “I put my foot down.”

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick makes first of 2 stops in Springfield at Renaissance School

$
0
0

"Schools like this and others tell us one thing: that every child can learn," Patrick said.

Patrick in Springfield 9811.jpgMassachusetts Gov. Deval L. Patrick appears at Renaissance School in Springfield to welcome students back to school. Here, he is flanked by seniors Trevor Narrington, on his right, and Victor Ortiz on his left.

SPRINGFIELD - In the first of two stops in Springfield on Thursday, Gov. Deval L. Patrick met with school officials, administrators and students at Renaissance School, one of the city's success stories.

Patrick toured the school, which has consistently turned out high graduation rates in a largely dismal public schools landscape.

"Schools like this and others tell us one thing: that every child can learn," Patrick said, stopping to talk to reporters after a private meeting with administrators at the school on Carew Street.

Patrick also fielded questions about flooding in Franklin County and a pending visit to a business in the tornado-ravaged city's South End neighborhood.

Patrick pointed to continuing public money being funneled to both the city's schools and weather-damaged neighborhoods.

"Public funding to the schools is at the highest level in the history of the commonwealth," Patrick said, adding that disaster recovery funding on the state and federal levels is advancing an effort to "rebuild and rebuild better" in Springfield.

Patrick is scheduled to visit Milano's Specialty Foods at 998 Main St. later on Thursday to assess the progress the neighborhood has made since his last visit approximately two months ago.


More details coming in The Republican.

Guy Wilson of Springfield will face manslaughter, not murder, charge in death of Paul Bagge

$
0
0

District Attorney Mark Mastroianni said the facts of the case do not fit a 1st degree murder charge but do fit the charge of manslaughter.

SE__GUY_WILSON_9034447.JPGPolice photo of Guy Wilson when he was arrested for assault of Paul Bagge

SPRINGFIELD – A Hampden Superior Court grand jury on Wednesday indicted Guy Wilson on a manslaughter charge for the July 13 death of Paul Bagge.

Wilson had pleaded not guilty to a murder charge in District Court, but now will face the manslaughter charge instead.

Hampden District Attorney Mark G. Mastroianni said the facts of the case do not fit a first degree murder charge but do fit the charge of manslaughter.

Bagge, 45, of 2411 Roosevelt Ave., died July 13, the day after he was assaulted on East Street.

According to police, Bagge suffered critical injuries when he was punched in the face and fell to the ground as he tried to break up a dispute on East Street between Wilson and a woman over a stray dog.

Wilson, 52, of 168 East St., was first charged with assault and battery, but then was arraigned in District Court on a murder charge when Bagge died.

Police reported a woman went to pick up a beagle that had been advertised as found.

Wilson accused her of being from the MSPCA and not the dog owner, and reached into her car and attempted to remove her keys from the ignition, police said.

Bagge came over in an attempt to reason with Wilson and tapped him on the shoulder. Wilson then turned and punched Bagge in the head, causing the victim to fall and suffer serious head trauma, police said.

Holyoke candidates for mayor pitch themselves and plans for jobs in 1st forum

$
0
0

Mayor Elaine Pluta is seeking a second term and challengers are Daniel C. Boyle, Alex B. Morse and Daniel C. Burns.

dbate.JPGDaniel C. Burns responds to a question during the Holyoke mayorial forum at Open Square Thursday night. Candidates from left are Alex B. Morse, Daniel C. Boyle, Daniel C. Burns and Holyoke Mayor Elaine A. Pluta.

HOLYOKE – Jobs and who is most qualified to create them dominated part of the first forum featuring the four candidates for mayor Thursday.

Daniel C. Burns, a former city councilor and former business owner, said that as mayor he would try to aim city projects at local companies to keep jobs on such projects local, though it was questionable whether low-bid laws might curtail that plan.

“The jobs are on the minds of all Americans this evening,” said Burns, 54.

Mayor Elaine A. Pluta said 74 new businesses brought 129 jobs here in her first, two-year term and she also supports having a casino resort if the state legalizes casino gambling for a 1,000-plus-jobs venture.

“As far as capturing jobs for our residents, nothing could be more important,” said Pluta, 67.

Alex B. Morse, a former career counselor, said the city owes it to each resident to provide job opportunities, such as helping small businesses get bank loans.

“It’s a matter of putting people’s destiny in their own hands,” said Morse, 22.

Business consultant Daniel C. Boyle said a key to producing jobs is to continue partnerships between the city and groups like the Latino Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Holyoke Chamber of Commerce, as well as targeted plans like internships to help young people learn what they’re good at.

“I think that would be a very effective tool for our people in Holyoke,” said Boyle, 63.

The forum lasted an hour at Open Square, a former mill off Lyman Street.

Candidates also discussed whether it was important to increase the population, how to deal with poverty, how to market the city and how to get young people more involved in the city.

The four candidates will compete in the preliminary election Sept. 20 and the top two vote-getters there will be on the Election Day ballot Nov. 8.

The forum was sponsored by Open Square, Latino Chamber of Commerce, Boys and Girls Club of Greater Holyoke, Holyoke Taxpayers Association, and Citizens for the Revitalization and Urban Success of Holyoke or C.R.U.S.H.

This will be updated with more detail later.

Brimfield flooding detours traffic, derails some Brimfield Antiques Shows dealers

$
0
0

A section of Route 20 near the Sturbridge line was flooded, and dealers at the flea markets dealt with flooded fields.

Gallery preview

BRIMFIELD – This week's heavy rains caused flooding on Route 20, washouts and flooded roads in other locations and flooded fields at the Brimfield Antiques Shows on Thursday.

There was flooding on Route 20 about one mile west of the Sturbridge town line as water cascaded down onto the road from hills on the northern side, near the Springfield Boys Club camp, which had taken a direct hit from the June 1 tornadoes. State police had to work on traffic control.

Brimfield town public works crews had to deal with washouts and flooded roads in several locations Thursday morning, but they were clear by noon.

At the Brimfield Antiques Shows, Karen Zink was lamenting on Tuesday that the steady rain coming down kept her from opening the back tent flap, which was just a few feet from a pleasant, steady flowing brook.

By Thursday, the much heavier overnight and morning rain had caused the brook to overflow its banks, and there was water standing in the tent where Karen and her sister, Kathy Zink, were set up to sell antique jewelry.

They were used to some rain and some wind after more than 10 years of coming to the Brimfield shows, but the Zink sisters said Thursday’s rain made this the worst weather experience they ever had at the shows.

John Artruc, the outside operations manager at Shelton’s Field, helped move the Zink sisters to higher ground; by 11:30 a.m. they were set up and starting to sell to the few customers walking around.

The flooding along Route 20 also resulted in some parking areas staying closed, thinner crowds than expected and plenty of damp or wet merchandise.

Marion Scully of Enfield, Conn., had 6 inches of water on the floor of her tent, but her show neighbor, Gary Pennington, loaned her a card table. She set up at the side of a road through the field, displaying her antique silver on the card table and the back of her mini-van.

Pennington did some digging to drain some of the water, and moved some of his furniture up onto tables in the tent next door being run by John Haas.

Haas and Pennington are both from Pennsylvania and both learned of flooding at their homes Thursday morning.

The Brimfield flooding meant more work and fewer sales than planned, but several dealers said the neighborly attitude that develops at the May, July and September shows meant people helping people.

“We are not making any money, and this is the worst Brimfield I have ever seen,” Haas said.

But Haas has been coming three times a year for 25 years, plans to stay through Sunday and hopes to keep coming for another 25 years.

“This is what we do,” Haas said. “We love Brimfield.”

May’s Antiques Market was scheduled to open Thursday morning but postponed its opening to Friday because the May’s field was flooded. J & J Promotions will also open Friday.

President Barack Obama asks for $450 billion to lift economy, challenges Congress to act swiftly

$
0
0

The newest and boldest element of Obama's plan would slash the Social Security payroll tax both for tens of millions of workers and for employers, too.

090811 barack obama jobs speech.JPGPresident Barack Obama delivers a speech to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 8, 2011. Watching are Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner. (AP Photo/Kevin Lamarque, POOL)

By BEN FELLER
AP White House Correspondent

WASHINGTON — Confronting an economy in peril, President Barack Obama unveiled a larger-than-expected $450 billion plan Thursday night to boost jobs and put cash in the pockets of dispirited Americans, urging Republican skeptics to embrace an approach heavy on the tax cuts they traditionally love. With millions of voters watching and skeptical of Washington, Obama repeatedly challenged Congress to act swiftly.

The newest and boldest element of Obama's plan would slash the Social Security payroll tax both for tens of millions of workers and for employers, too. For individuals, that tax has been shaved from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for this year but is to go back up again without action by Congress. Obama wants to deepen the cut to 3.1 percent for workers.

"This plan is the right thing to do right now," Obama said after a divided body rose in warm unison to greet him. "You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country."

In his televised address to Congress, Obama sought to provide a jolt for the economy, still staggering on his watch, and for his own standing at one of the lowest marks of his presidency. He put forth a jobs plan that he hopes can get bipartisan support and spur hiring in a nation where 14 million people remain out of work and the jobless rate is stuck at 9.1 percent. Public confidence in his stewardship of the economy is eroding.

Obama did not venture an estimate as to how many jobs his plan would create. He promised repeatedly that his plan would be paid for, but never said how, pledging to release those details soon.

The president also would apply the Social Security payroll tax cut to employers, halving their taxes to 3.1 percent on their first $5 million in payroll. Businesses that hire new workers or give raises to those they already employ would get an even bigger benefit: On payroll increases up to $50 million they would pay no Social Security tax.

Obama also proposed spending to fix schools and roads, hire local teachers and police and to extend unemployment benefits. He proposed a tax credit for businesses that hire people out of work for six months or longer, plus other tax relief aimed at winning bipartisan support in a time of divided government.

Under soaring expectations for results, Obama sought to put himself on the side of voters who he said could not care less about the political consequences of his speech.

"The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy," Obama said.

His aim Thursday night was to put pressure on Congress to act — and to share the responsibility for fixing the economic mess that is sure to figure in next year's elections. For every time he told lawmakers to "pass the bill" — and he said over and over — Democrats cheered while Republicans sat in silence.

Tax cuts amounted to the broadest part of Obama's proposal — in essence, a challenge by the Democratic president to congressional Republicans to get behind him on one of their own cherished economic principles or risk the wrath of voters for inaction. The tax cuts alone would amount to roughly $250 billion.

The president said deepening the payroll tax cut would save an average family making $50,000 a year about $1,500 compared to what they would if Congress did not extend the current tax cut.

"I know some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live," Obama said, a reference to the conservative tea party influence on many House Republicans. "Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise-middle class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away."

Politics shadowed every element of Obama's speech. He implored people watching on TV to lobby lawmakers to act. He did the same thing before his speech in an email to campaign supporters, bringing howls of hypocrisy Republicans who wondered why Obama was telling them to put party above country.

The American public is weary of talk and wary of promises that help is on the way.

In one striking sign of discontent, nearly 80 percent of people think the country is headed in the wrong direction. That's about the same level of pessimism as when Obama took office. It reflects both persistently high unemployment and disgust with Washington infighting.

No incumbent president in recent history has won re-election with the unemployment rate anywhere near the current 9.1 percent.

Obama's jobs plan put a special emphasis on the long-term unemployed — those who have been out of work for six months or more. He repeated his calls for a one-year extension of unemployment insurance in order to prevent up to 6 million people from losing their benefits, and he proposed a $4,000 tax credit for businesses that hire workers who have been out of work for more than six months.

A key part of Obama's approach was to appeal to the lawmakers in front of him to pass a deal, and to position them for blame for inaction should the jobs plan fall short.

"The next election is 14 months away," he said. "And the people who sent us here — the people who hired us to work for them — they don't have the luxury of waiting 14 months. ... They need help, and they need it now."


Text of President Barack Obama's American Jobs Act speech to Congress

$
0
0

President Obama to Congress: "You should pass this jobs plan right away."

090811_barack_obama_jobs_speech_2.JPGPresident Barack Obama speaks to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 8, 2011. Watching are Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Remarks of President Barack Obama in an Address to a Joint Session of Congress

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and fellow Americans:

Tonight we meet at an urgent time for our country. We continue to face an economic crisis that has left millions of our neighbors jobless, and a political crisis that has made things worse.

This past week, reporters have been asking “What will this speech mean for the President? What will it mean for Congress? How will it affect their polls, and the next election?”

But the millions of Americans who are watching right now: they don’t care about politics. They have real life concerns. Many have spent months looking for work. Others are doing their best just to scrape by – giving up nights out with the family to save on gas or make the mortgage; postponing retirement to send a kid to college.

These men and women grew up with faith in an America where hard work and responsibility paid off. They believed in a country where everyone gets a fair shake and does their fair share – where if you stepped up, did your job, and were loyal to your company, that loyalty would be rewarded with a decent salary and good benefits; maybe a raise once in awhile. If you did the right thing, you could make it in America.

But for decades now, Americans have watched that compact erode. They have seen the deck too often stacked against them. And they know that Washington hasn’t always put their interests first.

The people of this country work hard to meet their responsibilities. The question tonight is whether we’ll meet ours. The question is whether, in the face of an ongoing national crisis, we can stop the political circus and actually do something to help the economy; whether we can restore some of the fairness and security that has defined this nation since our beginning.

Those of us here tonight can’t solve all of our nation’s woes. Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers. But we can help. We can make a difference. There are steps we can take right now to improve people’s lives.

I am sending this Congress a plan that you should pass right away. It’s called the American Jobs Act. There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation. Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans – including many who sit here tonight. And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything.

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for the long-term unemployed. It will provide a tax break for companies who hire new workers, and it will cut payroll taxes in half for every working American and every small business. It will provide a jolt to an economy that has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they invest and hire, there will be customers for their products and services. You should pass this jobs plan right away.

Everyone here knows that small businesses are where most new jobs begin. And you know that while corporate profits have come roaring back, smaller companies haven’t. So for everyone who speaks so passionately about making life easier for “job creators,” this plan is for you.

Pass this jobs bill, and starting tomorrow, small businesses will get a tax cut if they hire new workers or raise workers’ wages. Pass this jobs bill, and all small business owners will also see their payroll taxes cut in half next year. If you have 50 employees making an average salary, that’s an $80,000 tax cut. And all businesses will be able to continue writing off the investments they make in 2012.

It’s not just Democrats who have supported this kind of proposal. Fifty House Republicans have proposed the same payroll tax cut that’s in this plan. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and we can put people to work rebuilding America. Everyone here knows that we have badly decaying roads and bridges all over this country. Our highways are clogged with traffic. Our skies are the most congested in the world.

This is inexcusable. Building a world-class transportation system is part of what made us an economic superpower. And now we’re going to sit back and watch China build newer airports and faster railroads? At a time when millions of unemployed construction workers could build them right here in America?

There are private construction companies all across America just waiting to get to work. There’s a bridge that needs repair between Ohio and Kentucky that’s on one of the busiest trucking routes in North America. A public transit project in Houston that will help clear up one of the worst areas of traffic in the country. And there are schools throughout this country that desperately need renovating. How can we expect our kids to do their best in places that are literally falling apart? This is America. Every child deserves a great school – and we can give it to them, if we act now.

The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows; installing science labs and high-speed internet in classrooms all across this country. It will rehabilitate homes and businesses in communities hit hardest by foreclosures. It will jumpstart thousands of transportation projects across the country. And to make sure the money is properly spent and for good purposes, we’re building on reforms we’ve already put in place. No more earmarks. No more boondoggles. No more bridges to nowhere. We’re cutting the red tape that prevents some of these projects from getting started as quickly as possible. And we’ll set up an independent fund to attract private dollars and issue loans based on two criteria: how badly a construction project is needed and how much good it would do for the economy.

This idea came from a bill written by a Texas Republican and a Massachusetts Democrat. The idea for a big boost in construction is supported by America’s largest business organization and America’s largest labor organization. It’s the kind of proposal that’s been supported in the past by Democrats and Republicans alike. You should pass it right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and thousands of teachers in every state will go back to work. These are the men and women charged with preparing our children for a world where the competition has never been tougher. But while they’re adding teachers in places like South Korea, we’re laying them off in droves. It’s unfair to our kids. It undermines their future and ours. And it has to stop. Pass this jobs bill, and put our teachers back in the classroom where they belong.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get extra tax credits if they hire America’s veterans. We ask these men and women to leave their careers, leave their families, and risk their lives to fight for our country. The last thing they should have to do is fight for a job when they come home.

Pass this bill, and hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged young people will have the hope and dignity of a summer job next year. And their parents, low-income Americans who desperately want to work, will have more ladders out of poverty.

Pass this jobs bill, and companies will get a $4,000 tax credit if they hire anyone who has spent more than six months looking for a job. We have to do more to help the long-term unemployed in their search for work. This jobs plan builds on a program in Georgia that several Republican leaders have highlighted, where people who collect unemployment insurance participate in temporary work as a way to build their skills while they look for a permanent job. The plan also extends unemployment insurance for another year. If the millions of unemployed Americans stopped getting this insurance, and stopped using that money for basic necessities, it would be a devastating blow to this economy. Democrats and Republicans in this Chamber have supported unemployment insurance plenty of times in the past. At this time of prolonged hardship, you should pass it again – right away.

Pass this jobs bill, and the typical working family will get a fifteen hundred dollar tax cut next year. Fifteen hundred dollars that would have been taken out of your paycheck will go right into your pocket. This expands on the tax cut that Democrats and Republicans already passed for this year. If we allow that tax cut to expire – if we refuse to act – middle-class families will get hit with a tax increase at the worst possible time. We cannot let that happen. I know some of you have sworn oaths to never raise any taxes on anyone for as long as you live. Now is not the time to carve out an exception and raise middle-class taxes, which is why you should pass this bill right away.

This is the American Jobs Act. It will lead to new jobs for construction workers, teachers, veterans, first responders, young people and the long-term unemployed. It will provide tax credits to companies that hire new workers, tax relief for small business owners, and tax cuts for the middle-class. And here’s the other thing I want the American people to know: the American Jobs Act will not add to the deficit. It will be paid for. And here’s how:

The agreement we passed in July will cut government spending by about $1 trillion over the next ten years. It also charges this Congress to come up with an additional $1.5 trillion in savings by Christmas. Tonight, I’m asking you to increase that amount so that it covers the full cost of the American Jobs Act. And a week from Monday, I’ll be releasing a more ambitious deficit plan – a plan that will not only cover the cost of this jobs bill, but stabilize our debt in the long run.

This approach is basically the one I’ve been advocating for months. In addition to the trillion dollars of spending cuts I’ve already signed into law, it’s a balanced plan that would reduce the deficit by making additional spending cuts; by making modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid; and by reforming our tax code in a way that asks the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share. What’s more, the spending cuts wouldn’t happen so abruptly that they’d be a drag on our economy, or prevent us from helping small business and middle-class families get back on their feet right away.

Now, I realize there are some in my party who don’t think we should make any changes at all to Medicare and Medicaid, and I understand their concerns. But here’s the truth. Millions of Americans rely on Medicare in their retirement. And millions more will do so in the future. They pay for this benefit during their working years. They earn it. But with an aging population and rising health care costs, we are spending too fast to sustain the program. And if we don’t gradually reform the system while protecting current beneficiaries, it won’t be there when future retirees need it. We have to reform Medicare to strengthen it.

I’m also well aware that there are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it. But here is what every American knows. While most people in this country struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets. Right now, Warren Buffet pays a lower tax rate than his secretary – an outrage he has asked us to fix. We need a tax code where everyone gets a fair shake, and everybody pays their fair share. And I believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal house in order.

I’ll also offer ideas to reform a corporate tax code that stands as a monument to special interest influence in Washington. By eliminating pages of loopholes and deductions, we can lower one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Our tax code shouldn’t give an advantage to companies that can afford the best-connected lobbyists. It should give an advantage to companies that invest and create jobs here in America.

So we can reduce this deficit, pay down our debt, and pay for this jobs plan in the process. But in order to do this, we have to decide what our priorities are. We have to ask ourselves, “What’s the best way to grow the economy and create jobs?”

Should we keep tax loopholes for oil companies? Or should we use that money to give small business owners a tax credit when they hire new workers? Because we can’t afford to do both. Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires? Or should we put teachers back to work so our kids can graduate ready for college and good jobs? Right now, we can’t afford to do both.

This isn’t political grandstanding. This isn’t class warfare. This is simple math. These are real choices that we have to make. And I’m pretty sure I know what most Americans would choose. It’s not even close. And it’s time for us to do what’s right for our future.

The American Jobs Act answers the urgent need to create jobs right away. But we can’t stop there. As I’ve argued since I ran for this office, we have to look beyond the immediate crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future – an economy that creates good, middle-class jobs that pay well and offer security. We now live in a world where technology has made it possible for companies to take their business anywhere. If we want them to start here and stay here and hire here, we have to be able to out-build, out-educate, and out-innovate every other country on Earth.

This task, of making America more competitive for the long haul, is a job for all of us. For government and for private companies. For states and for local communities – and for every American citizen. All of us will have to up our game. All of us will have to change the way we do business.

My administration can and will take some steps to improve our competitiveness on our own. For example, if you’re a small business owner who has a contract with the federal government, we’re going to make sure you get paid a lot faster than you do now. We’re also planning to cut away the red tape that prevents too many rapidly-growing start-up companies from raising capital and going public. And to help responsible homeowners, we’re going to work with Federal housing agencies to help more people refinance their mortgages at interest rates that are now near 4% -- a step that can put more than $2,000 a year in a family’s pocket, and give a lift to an economy still burdened by the drop in housing prices.

Other steps will require Congressional action. Today you passed reform that will speed up the outdated patent process, so that entrepreneurs can turn a new idea into a new business as quickly as possible. That’s the kind of action we need. Now it’s time to clear the way for a series of trade agreements that would make it easier for American companies to sell their products in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea – while also helping the workers whose jobs have been affected by global competition. If Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I want to see folks in South Korea driving Fords and Chevys and Chryslers. I want to see more products sold around the world stamped with three proud words: “Made in America.”

And on all of our efforts to strengthen competitiveness, we need to look for ways to work side-by-side with America’s businesses. That’s why I’ve brought together a Jobs Council of leaders from different industries who are developing a wide range of new ideas to help companies grow and create jobs.

Already, we’ve mobilized business leaders to train 10,000 American engineers a year, by providing company internships and training. Other businesses are covering tuition for workers who learn new skills at community colleges. And we’re going to make sure the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in China or Europe, but right here, in the United States of America. If we provide the right incentives and support – and if we make sure our trading partners play by the rules – we can be the ones to build everything from fuel-efficient cars to advanced biofuels to semiconductors that are sold all over the world. That’s how America can be number one again. That’s how America will be number one again.

Now, I realize that some of you have a different theory on how to grow the economy. Some of you sincerely believe that the only solution to our economic challenges is to simply cut most government spending and eliminate most government regulations.

Well, I agree that we can’t afford wasteful spending, and I will continue to work with Congress to get rid of it. And I agree that there are some rules and regulations that put an unnecessary burden on businesses at a time when they can least afford it. That’s why I ordered a review of all government regulations. So far, we’ve identified over 500 reforms, which will save billions of dollars over the next few years. We should have no more regulation than the health, safety, and security of the American people require. Every rule should meet that common sense test.

But what we can’t do – what I won’t do – is let this economic crisis be used as an excuse to wipe out the basic protections that Americans have counted on for decades. I reject the idea that we need to ask people to choose between their jobs and their safety. I reject the argument that says for the economy to grow, we have to roll back protections that ban hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the health insurance industry from shortchanging patients. I reject the idea that we have to strip away collective bargaining rights to compete in a global economy. We shouldn’t be in a race to the bottom, where we try to offer the cheapest labor and the worst pollution standards. America should be in a race to the top. And I believe that’s a race we can win.

In fact, this larger notion that the only thing we can do to restore prosperity is just dismantle government, refund everyone’s money, let everyone write their own rules, and tell everyone they’re on their own – that’s not who we are. That’s not the story of America.

Yes, we are rugged individualists. Yes, we are strong and self-reliant. And it has been the drive and initiative of our workers and entrepreneurs that has made this economy the engine and envy of the world.

But there has always been another thread running throughout our history – a belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation.

We all remember Abraham Lincoln as the leader who saved our Union. But in the middle of a Civil War, he was also a leader who looked to the future – a Republican president who mobilized government to build the transcontinental railroad; launch the National Academy of Sciences; and set up the first land grant colleges. And leaders of both parties have followed the example he set.

Ask yourselves – where would we be right now if the people who sat here before us decided not to build our highways and our bridges; our dams and our airports? What would this country be like if we had chosen not to spend money on public high schools, or research universities, or community colleges? Millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, had the opportunity to go to school because of the GI Bill. Where would we be if they hadn’t had that chance?

How many jobs would it have cost us if past Congresses decided not to support the basic research that led to the Internet and the computer chip? What kind of country would this be if this Chamber had voted down Social Security or Medicare just because it violated some rigid idea about what government could or could not do? How many Americans would have suffered as a result?

No single individual built America on their own. We built it together. We have been, and always will be, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all; a nation with responsibilities to ourselves and with responsibilities to one another. Members of Congress, it is time for us to meet our responsibilities.

Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight is the kind that’s been supported by Democrats and Republicans in the past. Every proposal I’ve laid out tonight will be paid for. And every proposal is designed to meet the urgent needs of our people and our communities.

I know there’s been a lot of skepticism about whether the politics of the moment will allow us to pass this jobs plan – or any jobs plan. Already, we’re seeing the same old press releases and tweets flying back and forth. Already, the media has proclaimed that it’s impossible to bridge our differences. And maybe some of you have decided that those differences are so great that we can only resolve them at the ballot box.

But know this: the next election is fourteen months away. And the people who sent us here – the people who hired us to work for them – they don’t have the luxury of waiting fourteen months. Some of them are living week to week; paycheck to paycheck; even day to day. They need help, and they need it now.

I don’t pretend that this plan will solve all our problems. It shouldn’t be, nor will it be, the last plan of action we propose. What’s guided us from the start of this crisis hasn’t been the search for a silver bullet. It’s been a commitment to stay at it – to be persistent – to keep trying every new idea that works, and listen to every good proposal, no matter which party comes up with it.

Regardless of the arguments we’ve had in the past, regardless of the arguments we’ll have in the future, this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country. I also ask every American who agrees to lift your voice and tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option. Remind us that if we act as one nation, and one people, we have it within our power to meet this challenge.

President Kennedy once said, “Our problems are man-made – therefore they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants.”

These are difficult years for our country. But we are Americans. We are tougher than the times that we live in, and we are bigger than our politics have been. So let’s meet the moment. Let’s get to work, and show the world once again why the United States of America remains the greatest nation on Earth. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Holyoke police arrest 6 on drug charges in raid on troubled South East Street apartment building

$
0
0

The city put the building on a demolition list in 1999.

HOLYOKE – A Thursday afternoon raid on a South Holyoke apartment building led to the arrest of six city residents on drug and firearm charges.

Arrested were:

  • Aristides Perez, 24, of apartment #4 front, charged with possession of a Class B substance and possession of ammunition and a firearm without an FID card;

  • Norma Caban, 56, of apartment #4 front, charged with possession of Class A and B substances;

  • Jose Velazquez, 39, of apartment #3 rear, charged with possession of a Class B substance and possession of a counterfeit note;

  • Pedro Perdomo, 47, of apartment #4 rear, charged with possession of a Class D substance, possession of a Class D substance with intent to distribute, and a drug violation within 100 feet of a public park;

  • Maria Elsa Garcia, 48, of apartment #2 front, charged with possession of a Class B substance, possession of a Class B substance with intent to distribute, conspiracy to violate a drug law, and a drug violation within 100 feet of a public park;

  • Gilberto Rodriguez-Garcia, of apartment #2 left, charged with possession of a Class B substance, possession of a Class B substance with intent to distribute, conspiracy to violate a drug law, and a drug violation within 100 feet of a public park.

Police conducted the raid at 3:25 p.m. Thursday, the department's arrest log shows. Arraignment information for the six is expected to be available later on Friday.

Reports in the archives of The Republican tell the story of the building's troubled history over the past decade.

A May 2010 raid there led to the arrest of a 21-year-old woman on cocaine and ammunition charges; an April 2009 state-funded "Tack Back Our Streets" crackdown netted a 28-year-old building resident on charges of possession of Class A and Class B substances and possession to distribute both substances.

A 28-year-old man was charged with trafficking cocaine (28 to 100 grams), violation of a drug-free zone and possession of marijuana following an October 14, 2008 raid on the building, and a 20-year-old man was charged with possession of heroin, possession of heroin with intent to distribute, violation of a drug-free zone and possession of marijuana in the same incident.

In 2004, police responded to the rear of the building and found an injured man who said he'd been thrown from a fourth-floor porch by four men.

A March 1999 sting operation snared a 25-year-old woman who lived at the building when she allegedly sold an ounce of crack cocaine to an undercover officer.

In December 1999, the city chose 640 South East Street as one of the final 12 buildings to be razed under a $2.5 million budget allocation. The project saw the demolition of nearly four dozen city buildings, but 640 South East Street remained standing.

Assessed at $168,500, the building is owned by BJ's Nominee Trust, according to city records. The trust owns an adjacent parcel on South East Street, but no other property in the city.

9/11 10th anniversary: Former head of FAA Jane Garvey recalls tragic events

$
0
0

Within four hours of the first Sept. 11 attack, every civilian aircraft in the nation - more than 5,000 planes - was safely on the ground.

robert garvey, jane garveyRobert and Jane Garvey

Within four hours of the first attack, every civilian aircraft in the nation - more than 5,000 planes - was safely on the ground.

Like everyone who remembers Sept. 11, 2001, Jane Garvey has a story about where she was when she heard about the terrorist attacks on America.

It's just that hers took place at the heart of that day's national panic.

Garvey, who makes her home in Amherst with husband Robert J. Garvey, the Hampshire County sheriff, was the head of the Federal Aviation Administration. Appointed to the post by former President Bill Clinton, she was nearing the end of a five-year term.

Although the day that has come to be known simply as 9/11 was like no other for Jane Garvey, the preceding portion of her tenure as head of the agency which oversees the nation's civilian aviation system had its challenges.

As the year 2000 approached, Garvey had dealt with the predicted global computer malfunction and its possible effect on the nation's air traffic, a threat that proved to be overblown. There were also a number of high-profile air accidents from the 1990s which had lingering repercussions.

"It was quite an interesting period in the history of the agency," she recalled recently.

On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Garvey was in Washington, D.C., with U.S. transportation secretary Norman Y. Mineta in a meeting with European leaders on environmental issues. The skies of America, she recalled, were crystal clear for flying that morning, what they call in the business a "severe clear day."

Mineta, she recalled, had a television on in his offices outside the meeting room. Suddenly, his chief of staff burst in, a breach of protocol that Garvey knew meant trouble.

As she guessed, the news wasn't good: The first plane had hit one of the towers.
"At the same time, my pager was going off," she said.

Garvey, already suspecting a possible highjacking, headed back to her own office in the FAA building that overlooks the Washington Mall, about a five-minute ride away.

"By the time I got back, our operations center was swinging into action," she said. "The second plane had hit. Now, we knew we had a really serious incident."


Garvey made the decision to halt air traffic across the country, a step that air traffic controllers in Boston and New York had already made on their own. "It was absolutely the right thing to do," Garvey said.

Amid the crashing of a third plane into the Pentagon in Washington and a fourth into a field in Shanksville, Pa., a planned attack on the White House that was thwarted by the plane's crew and passengers, there were other false alarms that morning.

Two Delta flights accidentally turned off their transponders, sending the FAA into confusion. No one rested easily until the 5,000 planes in the air were safely on the ground, Garvey said.

"I'll never forget standing in the command center and watching the dots on the (radar) screen slowly disappear when each plane descended," she said. "Many people in that control room breathed a sigh of relief."

In the end, order was restored, and Garvey says it was a remarkable day for the agency's professionals. It was long from over for her, however.

Mineta had gone to join the vice president, Dick Cheney, but Garvey remained in contact with him all day. As authorities began to evacuate Washington, D.C., Garvey called home. "It was a very short conversation," she recalled. "I told him we were all safe."

(She still remembers the eerie quiet that night as she walked the deserted streets of the nation's capital; "it was quite remarkable," Garvey said.)

Back home, the sheriff had been exiting the Hampshire County courthouse in Northampton when the attacks began that morning. "I turned on the car radio and heard about it immediately," Robert Garvey said. "I was very, very concerned."

He tried twice to call his wife, and both times was unsuccessful. When she finally reached him she was being taken to an undisclosed location, he knew everything would be fine.
"She handles pressure very, very well," he said.

Jane Garvey had dealt with her share of turmoil as the commissioner of the Massachusetts Highway Department, the head of Logan Airport and, later, in the Federal Highway Administration before taking the FAA job. Still, her husband knew this was unexplored territory.

"There was nothing of this magnitude before," he said. "This was far beyond anything."

US_ATTACKS_AIRLINE_SECURITY_1559002.JPGView full size

For Jane Garvey, Sept. 11 was the beginning of an exercise in crisis management that lasted through the end of her term the following August.

"We had to re-examine how we trained flight attendants and pilots," she said. "We had to institute rules like no more knives (with meals), things we took for granted."

It was several days before the nations' airways were deemed clear for flying, and then the difficult work of rebuilding the confidence of the flying public and ensuring airline safety.

"That whole year until I left was pretty intense," she said.

It was about 10 days until Jane Garvey made it home to Amherst to see her husband face-to-face.

"You could tell she had been through a very, very difficult time," said Robert Garvey. "She looked tired and worn. She had very little sleep."

The Garveys found that the best way to decompress was simply to stay home.
"Part of the problem is that everyone you run into wants to talk about it," said the sheriff. "We wanted to not have to go out and talk to a lot of people."

Jane Garvey is now a consultant for Meridiam Infrastructure Fund, an investment fund. She also heads a bipartisan, policy center in Washington that tries to find common ground between Democrats and Republicans on a wide range of issues.

Her work today often takes her around the country, but is not as stressful as heading the FAA, a 24-hour-a-day agency with 50,000 employees.

As the 10th anniversary of the attacks draws near, Robert Garvey says it brings back all kinds of memories. "You can't help but almost relive the circumstances surrounding us at the time," he said.

For Jane Garvey, those memories have never been very far away over the last decade.
"I don't think anyone who was part of the government at the time hasn't thought of 9/11 on many, many days," she said.

Slipping Michele Bachmann seeks jolt for GOP campaign

$
0
0

A victory in Iowa this winter would keep Bachmann afloat in the GOP nomination fight; a loss would almost certainly end her bid.

090911bachmann.jpgRepublican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., campaigns at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa, Friday, Aug. 12, 2011.

DES MOINES, Iowa — Republican Michele Bachmann's presidential campaign fell just as quickly as it rose. Now, she's looking to Iowa — at the expense of other early voting states — to get back on track.

It's a strategy of necessity for the Minnesota congresswoman. A victory in Iowa this winter would keep her afloat in the GOP nomination fight; a loss would almost certainly end her bid.

"We know that when Michele is in Iowa, she wins," said Bachmann's Iowa campaign chairman, Kent Sorenson. "If she's here, she'll win Iowa."

That explains why, starting this weekend, Bachmann plans to campaign almost exclusively in the state as she tries to reassert herself in a race that's become a two-candidate contest between Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

She's in a far different position than she was earlier this summer when she entered the race and seemingly overnight began hovering atop state and national public opinion polls. In August, she rode that wave of popularity to an Iowa straw poll victory. But that same day, Perry became a candidate. He quickly filled the role of the GOP field's insurgent outsider, stalled Bachmann's momentum and infringed on her base of support.

Since then, Bachmann has faced criticism from voters and activists for appearing too scripted. She's also shuffled her top campaign leadership. And she found herself eclipsed in Wednesday's debate in California after figuring prominently in previous ones and winning praise for her poise.

Her newfound strategy calls for an intense focus on Iowa, where she already has a strong organization and a natural base of support with evangelical Republicans, home-school advocates and tea partyers.

The hope among Bachmann advisers is that an Iowa victory could propel her to the South Carolina primary, where Republican voters resemble Iowa's heavy segment of Christian conservatives. She spent a chunk of the past month in the state, as well as in Florida, courting tea party activists and other conservatives.

But the renewed focus on Iowa — she plans to spend much of the next five months there — means Bachmann is likely to bypass Nevada's under-the-radar caucuses and remain scarce in New Hampshire, where she has almost no organization in place for the first-in-the-nation primary.

The next few weeks represent a critical period for Bachmann. She is hoping to right her campaign and take advantage of a time when Perry is facing heightened scrutiny that's certain to come with more debates this month and the end of his first fundraising quarter at the end of September.

Perry too is organizing aggressively in Iowa, and aides to Romney, who is not campaigning aggressively in the state, say he may step up his Iowa presence to confront Perry sooner in the nominating chase. That could complicate Bachmann's effort to dominate Iowa at a time when she is adjusting to new campaign leadership.

Ed Rollins announced Sunday he was stepping aside as Bachmann's campaign manager and into an advisory role. Rollins' deputy, David Polyansky, also quit the campaign after being passed over to take over the day-to-day management.

Republican observers viewed the moves as a reaction to Bachmann's fade in polls. She has slipped to the low single digits in national polls and now trails Perry in Iowa surveys.

The staff shake-up provides Bachmann with an opportunity to shed the image of an over-managed celebrity.

Some Iowa Republicans recently criticized Bachmann for staying on her campaign bus during a county GOP dinner while Perry was speaking. The episode fed a budding narrative that Bachmann pays more attention to stagecraft than mingling with activists, something that doesn't sit well with Iowans used to politicians doing retail campaigning.

"Her campaign has to drop this rock-star motif," said Judd Saul, an undecided Iowa Republican who attended the event last month. "She won the straw poll but needs to dig in, shake our hands, get to know us."

Other would-be backers have grown frustrated by what they view as a sound-bite campaign.

Retired nurse Ellen Harward, a Myrtle Beach Republican, was attracted to Bachmann after seeing her at a late June rally. But by this week, Harward had not decided whether she would back her in the South Carolina primary, the first Southern contest.

"She's starting to sound like a broken record," Harward said. "If she could come out and show something that would set her apart from everyone else, it would make people start looking at her in a different way. It might give her some oomph her campaign needs."

The return of Congress, which has spending and economic issues on its plate, also could give Bachmann a chance to reclaim the spotlight and rekindle the populist spark that built her into a surprise contender. Over the summer, she used her role as a vocal critic of the Obama administration and the GOP leadership in Congress to rail against deal-making in Washington, especially on raising the debt ceiling. She opposed it.

Obama uncle out of Mass. jail, whereabouts unclear

$
0
0

Onyango Obama is the half-brother of the president's father.

onyango obamaThis Aug. 24, 2011 black-and-white booking photo provided Monday, Aug. 29, 2011 by the Framingham Police Department shows Onyango Obama, arrested in Framingham, Mass., for several infractions, including operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol. He is the uncle of President Barack Obama.

BOSTON — Officials say President Barack Obama's uncle has been released from a Massachusetts jail two weeks after being arrested on a drunken driving charge.

Onyango Obama was detained by federal immigration officials for allegedly violating an order to return to his native Kenya. Federal officials would not say why he was released Thursday or where he went.

People who live in the same Framingham home as him and workers at a liquor store where he was a valued employee tell The Boston Globe they don't know where Obama is. His lawyers were unavailable for comment.

Onyango Obama is the half-brother of the president's father. Federal officials have said he was ordered to leave the U.S. nearly two decades ago. He was arrested in Framingham on Aug. 24 on the drunken driving count.

Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images