Quantcast
Channel: News
Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live

In Holyoke's state rep race, it's Democrat Aaron Vega vs. Repubican Linda Vacon, unenrolled Miguel Vasquez, maybe Jerome Hobert, too

$
0
0

Write-in ballots from two precincts couldn't be counted because they were mistakenly locked away with other ballots.

101409_linda_vacon_holyoke.jpgLinda L. Vacon
AVega2009.jpgAaron M. Vega


HOLYOKE -- City Councilors Aaron M. Vega for the Democratic Party and Linda L. Vacon for the Republican Party will face off in the Nov. 6 election for state representative after scoring wins in Thursday’s primary election.

Vega was essentially unopposed. A two-term councilor at large, he defeated Michael F. Kane who had held the 5th Hampden District seat since 2001 and had quit in June for another job, though his name was still on the ballot.

Unofficial results showed Vega with 1,884 votes to 913 for Kane.

Vacon, the Ward 5 councilor, was the only write-in candidate who sought the Republican Party nomination. She got 169 write-in votes, 19 more than the 150 necessary to put her name on the ballot.

City clerk staff late Thursday were scrambling to figure out a problem with some of the write-in votes on which the chances of write-in candidate Jerome T. Hobert appeared to be hinging.

Poll workers put the write-in results for Ward 1B and Ward 7B into the locked ballot boxes with the regular votes. They should have put them in a separate bag for separate hand-counting. State law prohibits such ward ballot boxes from being unlocked for 30 days after an election, Assistant City Clerk Louise K. Bisson said.

Newcomer Hobert, seeking the nomination of the Green-Rainbow Party, had 132 write-in votes – 18 short of the 150 needed to get onto the Nov. 6 ballot, aside from possible Hobert write-ins from Wards 1B and 7B, she said.

Bisson said she would contact the secretary of state’s office Friday to see whether those precincts’ write-in votes can be accessed sooner than 30 days.

Before the Ward 1B and 7B problem was known, Hobert was at City Hall and struck a philosophical tone.

“Hey, it’s only an election. Like my mother used to say, ‘The best you can do is the best you can do,’”Hobert said.

Hobert, 59, works in sales at Power Quality Solutions in Glastonbury, Conn.

Newcomer Miguel A. Vasquez, running a write-in campaign for the seat, unenrolled in terms of party affiliation, received 19 votes with incomplete results in, Bisson said.

Vasquez, 21, is a financial services associate at People’s United Bank here. He said he will compete in the Nov. 6 election as a write-in candidate.

Citywide, voter turnout was about 16 percent, or 4,000 of the 24,815 registered voters.

Vega and Vacon are seated next to each other in City Council Chambers at CIty Hall during meetings.

Vega, 42, was upbeat but clear a lot more work awaits.

“Couldn’t have done it without you guys,” Vega told supporters at his headquarters at Open Square.

“Volunteers made it all happen. Holyoke is on the rise. We’re going to make things happen. We’re going to make Holyoke a strong city again in Western Mass,” he said.

Vega co-owns Vega Yoga & Movement Arts here and is a freelance video editor.

Vacon, 58, health services director at Loomis House, said she was grateful to supporters for following through on pledges to vote for her.

“I just want to say a huge thank you to them for keeping their promises,” Vacon said.

She sees territory to claim because nearly 40 percent of the 3,037 ballots cast in the state representative race opted for choices other than Vega, Vacon said, noting Kane’s total and 279 blanks.

Vacon also noted a comment Kane made shortly after leaving the seat when he said he hoped someone would step forward for the seat “other than Vega.”

“I’d say people agreed with Rep. Kane, anybody but Vega,” Vacon said.


Marie Angelides easily wins Republican 2nd Hampden District state representative race amid voter fraud investigation

$
0
0

To complicate matters in an already complicated election, a stack of Democratic ballots shipped to the site were flawed and would not scan.

Angelides campaigns 9612.jpgLongmeadow selectman Marie Angelides, a candidate for 2nd Hampden District state representative, waves to voters Thursday outside Longmeadow's Community House polling place.

EAST LONGMEADOW - Amid an array of Democratic and Republican primary races, the GOP contest for 2nd Hampden Districtstate representative appeared to be the largest draw at Birchland Middle School - the town's single polling site.

And judging from the results, it was hardly a race. Longmeadow Republican Marie Angelides beat GOP contender Enrico "Jack" Villamaino easily amid a voter fraud scandal with 449 versus 87 votes in Villamaino's hometown.

Districtwide, Angelides beat Villamaino by a vote of 1,340 or 88 percent to 177 or 12 percent.

"Even David Duke won 10 percent of the vote," said James Driscoll, an East Longmeadow selectman on-hand for the tally.

Early results showed Angelides beat Villamaino 546 to 43 in Longmeadow, her hometown. The district also includes Monson.

East Longmeadow Town Clerk Thomas Florence said turnout was a record at 20 percent for a primary with only three contested races. Including absentee and write-in ballots, 2,133 were cast.

Poll workers and town officials were still painstakingly counting some ballots by hand nearly up to 10 p.m., as an influx in absentee ballots triggered the investigation now in the hands of the Hampden District Attorney's office.

Villamaino virtually dropped out of sight when his house was raided along with his now wife's, Courtney Llewellyn, another town employee, whom law enforcement officials have said was complicit in the alleged scam to falsify applications and smuggle out 200-plus absentee ballots.

Neither has faced criminal charges but Hampden County District Attorney Mark G. Mastroianni has confirmed it is an active investigation that has yielded evidence now be analyzed.

Two state-appointed election officials were dispatched by the Secretary of the commonwealth's office to oversee dealings and ensure absentee ballots were counted by hand.

Angelides said she was appreciative to voters for coming out despite the apparent disappearance of her opponent.

"I was concerned people wouldn't consider this a legitimate primary," she said as the votes were counted. "But they did and I'm pleased and excited. I'm glad to start focusing on the issues."

She said she was not expecting a concession call from Villamaino in this climate, as he did not offer one in the previous primary for the same seat in 2010 when she beat him by 284 votes. Angelides ultimately was defeated by Brian Ashe, D-Longmeadow, whom she will face in the general election in November.

Florence said he believed the ballot fiasco galvanized voters.

"It seems to have brought the townspeople out. They want their voices to be heard," Florence said earlier in the night.

To complicate matters in an already complicated election, a stack of Democratic ballots shipped to the site were flawed and would not scan, Florence said. They ultimately sorted that issue out as well.

One woman who declined to be quoted by name arrived to find she was among the purported absentee balloters. However, Florence allowed her to recast her vote on-site and marked the ballot with a large "C" for certified.

"All I know is I guess they tried to do something wrong with the votes and they got caught," the woman said. "But as I understand it, I was able to cast my vote (properly) today."

Susan Emond wins Clerk of Courts race in Franklin County

$
0
0

Emond said her first concern will be an impending move from the current courthouse to temporary quarters.

GREENFIELD — Susan Emond, first assistant to the Clerk of Courts in Franklin County, has won the race to replace her boss, Eve Blakeslee, who decided not to run again after holding the office for six years.

emond.JPGSusan Emond has been elected Clerk of Courts in Franklin County

With all 40 precincts reporting in the Democratic primary, Emond overcame her rival, attorney David Roulston, by a vote of 6,144 to 2,013. Because there is no Republican candidate, Emond is expected to win election in November.

The clerk of courts keeps court records, oversees the scheduling of court cases, administers oaths and declares verdicts for Superior Court.

Emond’s campaign message was that, as first assistant to the clerk of courts, she had first-hand familiarity with the position.

“The only difference between the clerk of courts and the first assistant is that the clerk of courts has authority to sign and approve our contracts. Other than that,” said Emond, “I have all the same authority.”

Blakeslee backed Emond in the race.

“I’m thrilled,” said Emond of the outcome, as she celebrated with pizza and cake at the French King Entertainment Center in Erving. “I think the people of Franklin County agree that the person who is doing the job should be given the job.

“I have the utmost respect for Attorney Roulston. It was a friendly race, and neither of us would have allowed it to be any other way,” she said.

Emond said her first concern will be an impending move from the current courthouse to temporary quarters. “I have to make sure it’s done properly and securely,” she said. “It could be as early as next spring or next summer.”

A new courthouse is scheduled to be completed in two to five years.

Emond has worked in the Franklin County courts for 19 years. She answered a newspaper ad and was hired by Clerk Magistrate John Johnson. She was then promoted twice by another Clerk Magistrate, Margaret Palmer.

Emond lives in Bernardston with her husband, Eric, and sons Brendan and Troy. She graduated from Greenfield High School and has a degree in accounting from Greenfield Community College.

She said the accounting degree is useful for overseeing the budget and payroll at Superior Court.

Fact Check: Joe Biden on jobs and Medicare

$
0
0

Vice President Joe Biden cited job gains under President Barack Obama while ignoring overall job losses.

biden-fact-check.jpgVice President Joe Biden addresses the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012.

By CALVIN WOODWARD
TOM RAUM
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Vice President Joe Biden cited job gains under President Barack Obama while ignoring overall job losses, standard fare at the Democratic National Convention. And he laced into Republicans for pitching a Medicare plan that bears little resemblance to their actual proposals.

A look at some of his statements Thursday night in a speech to the gathering in Charlotte, N.C., preceding Obama's address to the crowd:

BIDEN: "After the worst job loss since the Great Depression, we've created 4.5 million private sector jobs in the past 29 months."

THE FACTS: This seems to be a favorite statistic, because many speakers at the convention cited it. But it's misleading — a cherry-picked figure that counts jobs from when the recession reached its trough and employment began to grow again. It excludes jobs lost earlier in Obama's term, and masks the facts that joblessness overall has risen over his term so far.

As well, in the same 29 months that private sector jobs grew by 4.5 million, jobs in the public sector declined by about 500,000, making the net gain in that period about 4 million.

Overall, some 2 million jobs were lost during the recession that began in December 2007 in President George W. Bush's term and ended officially in June 2009 with Obama as president.

Never since World War II has the economy been so slow to recover all the jobs lost in a downturn.

___

BIDEN: "What they didn't tell you is that the plan they've put down on paper would immediately cut benefits to more than 30 million seniors already on Medicare. What they didn't tell you is the plan they're proposing would cause Medicare to go bankrupt by 2016."

THE FACTS: Biden wasn't referring to any Medicare plan of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney or running mate Paul Ryan, but apparently to the consequences of fully repealing Obama's health care law, which is unpopular with seniors even though it has sweetened Medicare in certain ways. A Medicare plan put forward by Ryan in Congress would have no immediate effect because it would apply only to future retirees.

Obama's health care law improved Medicare benefits, adding better coverage for beneficiaries with high prescription costs as well as removing co-pays for a set of preventive benefits. If the law is repealed, those benefits would be lost unless Congress decides otherwise.

Similarly, Romney's promise to restore Obama's $716 billion in Medicare cuts could have unintended consequences for the program. The cuts don't affect seniors directly, instead falling on hospitals, insurers and other service providers. Restoring the higher payments to providers would accelerate the depletion of Medicare's trust fund for inpatient care, from 2024 currently to 2016, unless Congress acts to stave that off.

___

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

Former Springfield Mayor Michael Albano wins Democratic primary for Governor's Council in political comeback; Michael Franco wins Republican nomination

$
0
0

The victories by Albano and Franco also assure that a Hampden County resident will sit on the Governor's Council for the first time since 1978.

083012 michael albano.JPGMichael Albano, a Democrat running for a seat on the Governor's Council, in an editorial board meeting at the offices of The Republican.

Former Springfield Mayor Michael J. Albano made a dramatic comeback in politics on Thursday, winning the Democratic primary for the Western Massachusetts seat on the Governor's Council.

Albano, who was Springfield mayor from 1995 to 2003, defeated Westfield lawyer Kevin J. Sullivan, and Chicopee City Councilor Gerry Roy to capture the party's nomination for the two-year position. Considering that a Democrat has held the seat for the past 40 years, Albano appears all but certain to win the general election on Nov. 6 to complete his political resurgence.

With all 309 precincts reporting in the sprawling 8th District, Albano received 43 percent of the vote; Sullivan, 41 percent and Roy, 17 percent.

In a phone interview, Albano, 61, said he was humbled and honored. He said he was grateful for endorsements from organized labor including the Pioneer Valley AFL-CIO Central Labor Council.

"Given the odds, this is an incredible comeback," Albano said.

Albano, a Longmeadow resident, won the primary after he bested Sullivan by almost 3,000 votes in Springfield.

The 8-member Governor's Council, a vestige of the Colonial era, votes whether to confirm judicial nominations by a governor. The Western Massachusetts district has 96 cities and towns.

Incumbent Thomas T. Merrigan of Greenfield is not running for re-election.

The victory was sweet vindication for Albano. The former mayor left office in Springfield during an FBI investigation into his administration that resulted in federal jail terms for his former chief of staff and the leader of a city job training school.

sully.jpgKevin Sullivan

Sullivan, also vice-chairman of the Westfield School Committee, said he was disappointed but he said he had a lot of fun in the contest. Sullivan ran a positive campaign, emphasizing he was the only lawyer in the contest and would be a strong voice for Western Massachusetts at the Statehouse.

"I feel OK," said Sullivan, 46, in a phone interview. "It's a tough loss but it is not going to stop me from moving on."

In the general election, Albano will square off against Michael Franco, 49, a veterans-agent investigator for the city of Holyoke, who won Thursday's GOP primary.

In the Republican primary, Franco defeated Michael F. Case, 62, a retired Pittsfield police sergeant and selectman in the Berkshire County town of Washington. Franco won 52 percent of the vote to 48 percent for Case.

Franco2012.jpgMichael Franco

Franco for the fourth time will be the Republican nominee for Governor's Council. Thursday was the first time Franco faced primary competition for the position.

"We've done a lot of hard work over the years," Franco said in a statement. "So I think right now, the people are rewarding our effort."

The victories by Albano and Franco also assure that a Hampden County resident will sit on the Governor's Council for the first time since 1978.

In the Democratic primary, Albano won big in his former city. He received 6,177 votes in Springfield, or 57 percent, while Sullivan received 3,183 votes, or 29 percent and Roy, 1,466 or 19 percent.

Sullivan countered with a lopsided win in his home community. Sullivan netted 1,464 votes in Westfield, or 71 percent, while Albano received 358 ballots, or 17 percent; and Roy, 240 votes, or 12 percent.

Albano also won in Agawam, Belchertown, Hadley, Longmeadow, Ludlow and Wilbraham.

Sullivan defeated Albano in Amherst, Easthampton, Greenfield, Holyoke, Northampton, Pittsfield and West Springfield, but not by large enough margins.

Albano said he was the underdog in the contest. Sullivan was supported by much of the political establishment in Western Massachusetts including Hampden District Attorney Mark G. Mastroianni and Hampden Sheriff Michael J. Ashe.

Roy won in Chicopee, with 2,593 votes, or 58 percent. Albano received only 27 percent of the vote in Chicopee but he bested Sullivan by almost 500 votes in the city.

Albano loaned his campaign $25,000 and said he took out radio and television ads during the final days before the primary.

Five key moments from Thursday night at the Democratic National Convention

$
0
0

Pres. Barack Obama formally accepted his party's nomination Thursday night, Rep. Barney Frank introduced the crowd to a man named "Myth," and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords made a surprise appearance in Charlotte.

Obama 2012 DNCPresident Barack Obama addresses delegates during the final night of the Democratic National Convention Charlotte, N.C.
by Jeff Schmitt/Special to MassLive.com

Pres. Barack Obama formally accepted his party's nomination Thursday night, Rep. Barney Frank introduced the crowd to a man named "Myth," and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords made a surprise appearance in Charlotte. Here's a look at some of the key moments from the final night of the Democratic National Convention. 

Barack Obama accepts nomination for re-election
"We don't think that government is the source of all our problems, any more than our welfare recipients, or corporations, or unions, or immigrants, or gays, or any other group we're told to blame for our troubles." -- Pres. Barack Obama
Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois introduced Barack Obama Thursday night, just as he had eight years ago in Boston, before a speech widely credited with launching the career of a man who was then his state's junior senator. This time, Durbin introduced a sitting President in the midst of a contentious re-election campaign.

Pres. Obama then addressed a receptive crowd of 20,000 in Charlotte: comparing himself to the man he was before his meteoric rise in national politics in 2004, asking for more time to finish solving the problems facing America, and reminding them that the choice is theirs to make in November. The President reviewed his successes -- and failures -- during his four years in office, paying special attention to job growth, health care and education; he also stressed his opponent's weaknesses, pointing to an array of what he categorized as Gov. Romney's foreign policy gaffes. At the end of his speech, the President received an extended ovation and vowed that the challenges facing America can be met.

Read a transcript of the President's DNC speech or watch it in its entirety at C-SPAN.


Giffords DNC 2012Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, right, reacts after reciting the Pledge of Allegiance with Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida.
Gabrielle Giffords leads the DNC in Pledge of Allegiance

Perhaps the most poignant moment Thursday occurred when former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona walked onstage with DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and led the convention crowd in the Pledge of Allegiance. Giffords, who left office after a shooting left her close to death in January 2011, smiled broadly throughout her time on stage, and left to chants of "Gabby!"

Watch video of Giffords' return to the stage at the Democratic Convention in Charlotte.


Biden accepts nomination for Vice President
"The Bain way may bring your company the highest profits, but it's not the way to lead our country from the highest office." -- Vice Pres. Joe Biden
Vice President Joe Biden warned his Republican opponents that it's "never been a good bet to bet against the American people," as he warmed-up the crowd in Charlotte for the final night's keynote by Pres. Barack Obama.

Biden focused on the recovery of the auto industry and the affect it has had on both the American economy, and the American spirit. He also spoke at length about the decision Pres. Obama was faced with when he ordered the strike that killed Osama Bin Laden in 2011. Biden's wife, Jill, and son, Beau, spoke earlier Thursday evening.


Former Sen. John Kerry
"Ask Osama Bin Laden if he is better off now than he was four years ago." -- Former Sen. John Kerry


Former Sen. John Kerry returned to the national stage at the 2012 Convention, and delivered a speech focused primarily on Pres. Obama's foreign policy accomplishments since taking office. Kerry spoke with some of the passion critics felt he lacked eight years ago, and received thunderous applause when he spoke of the death of Osama Bin Laden. The former nominee also delivered a big laugh when he painted Gov. Mitt Romney's policy ideas as shifting, repurposing a line that haunted his own campaign in 2004, suggesting that on certain defense decisions, Romney was "for it, before he was against it." Kerry added, "Before you debate Barack Obama on foreign policy, you better finish the debate with yourself."


Rep. Barney Frank goes off-script to talk about "Myth" Romney
"Maybe, as a Democrat, I should be grateful that we got Mitt and not Myth, because if Myth Romney had ever been governor and had done all of the things we were told he can do, he would have been reelected overwhelmingly." -- Rep. Barney Frank
Barney Frank is set to retire at the end of his term, and the outspoken congressman from Massachusetts ignored prepared remarks that were to address Wall Street reform, and chose to address the gubernatorial record of a man he referred to as "Myth" Romney.

Frank was among a number of Democrats from Massachusetts who spoke this week in Charlotte to challenge former Gov. Mitt Romney on his tenure leading the state.


Bonus video: Caroline Kennedy compares Pres. Obama's election to her father's 1960 campaign
"Back then, I was inspired by the promise of Barack Obama's presidency," Kennedy said. "Today, I'm inspired by his record." -- Caroline Kennedy



Laura Gentile, winner of Hampden County Court Clerk primary: 'This win feels like something out of a movie'

$
0
0

Gentile won the Democratic primary for Hampden County Clerk of Courts in a close race with second highest vote-getter Thomas Ashe.

090612 laura gentile celebrates.JPGHampden County Clerk of Courts winner Laura Gentile gives a thumbs up to her supporters flanked by her husband Thomas Gentile, left, and son T.J. Gentile, right, outside A Touch of Garlic in Springfield on Thursday evening.

Updates a story posted Thursday at 10:21 p.m.


SPRINGFIELD — Laura S. Gentile said Thursday night that when she decided to run for Hampden Clerk of Courts she always had faith the voters would look at her record, qualifications and experience.

Gentile won the Democratic primary for Hampden County Clerk of Courts in a close race with second highest vote-getter Thomas M. Ashe.

There are no Republicans seeking the office, so Gentile, a Hampden County assistant clerk of courts for 16 years, should be stepping into the $110,000 post when the new year starts.

Gentile gathered with supporters Thursday night at A Touch of Garlic restaurant in Springfield.

“This win feels like something out of a movie,” Gentile said. “I have been wanting to make the office a better place. It’s a great staff, such dedicated people.”

Gentile bested Ashe, John P. DaCruz of Ludlow and Linda A. Stec DiSanti of Chicopee. She had 35 percent of the vote, with Ashe having 32 percent, DiSanti having 18 percent and DaCruz having 15 percent.

Gentile praised her opponents and said she would have been comfortable working for any of them if she had not won.

In a telephone interview Ashe said, “Obviously, I’m disappointed a little for myself, but more for the amount of work that everyone who was part of the campaign put in.”

“But I have no regrets. We came up a little bit short. That’s what elections are all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose,” he said.

Ashe took Springfield, getting 43 percent of the vote compared to Gentile’s 37 percent.

Gentile was victorious in communities that included Agawam, Holyoke, Longmeadow, Palmer, Westfield and Wilbraham.

DiSanti took 48 percent of the votes in her hometown of Chicopee. DiSanti, legal administrator and office manager at DiSanti Law Offices in West Springfield, ran an enthusiastic campaign. She hosted supporters with a bash at the Huke Lau in Chicopee.

DiSanti said she wanted to thank everybody who came out and voted.

“Thank your very much to my team. They all became a family to me and I believe I ran a professional campaign.”

DaCruz, a lawyer and former Ludlow selectman, was with his supporters at the Gremio Lusitano Club in Ludlow.

He won 69 percent of the votes in his hometown of Ludlow.

Ashe congratulated Gentile and the other opponents for their efforts.

“We ran a good hard, clean campaign,” Ashe said.

Ashe plans to remain on the City Council and said it is too early to discuss his future political plans. He said he spent the early evening “all over the map,” and was at the John Boyle O’Reilly Club when he conceded.

Where'd the time go? Obama girls now young women

$
0
0

After all, Malia Obama, now 14, who started (gasp!) high school this week, was just about as tall as her already tall parents.

Democratic Conventionthe Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

NEW YORK — Who were those willowy young women with Barack and Michelle Obama — and where'd they hide little Sasha and Malia?

Four years is a long time when it's a half or a third of your life, and so TV viewers who hadn't seen the Obama girls much since 2008 might have been truly startled at just how much they'd grown when they appeared onstage with their father Thursday night.

After all, Malia Obama, now 14, who started (gasp!) high school this week, was just about as tall as her already tall parents.

Relaxed and composed, in a French blue sleeveless dress, Malia laughed with her father onstage after his remarks, and earlier sat and applauded with her mom and her sister, Sasha, dressed in a black-and-white checked frock. (Now 11, Sasha hardly fits in her parents' laps anymore, and even resists a cuddle, the couple ruefully told People in an interview last month.)

There was one sign, though, that the girls were still kids: "Yes, you do have to go to school in the morning," their dad warned them at the beginning of his speech.

What struck one former White House aide was the ease and comfort with which the girls were inhabiting their public roles.

"Their smiles were genuine and huge tonight," said Anita McBride, a former chief of staff to Laura Bush, as well as an assistant to her husband. "There was no awkwardness. They clearly have adjusted to their life in the public eye." McBride said she was also stunned by how poised and grownup the girls looked.

One reason Thursday's scene was so striking is that the American public doesn't see the daughters regularly, especially on TV. "There hasn't been a steady stream of images to relate to," says Sandra Sobieraj, a correspondent for People who covers the first family.

So for many, the most familiar images are from four years ago. At the 2008 convention in Denver, Sasha, then 7, fidgeted in her purple children's dress, little white barrettes on either side of her head.

"Daddy, what city are you in?" she called out in a high-pitched voice as her dad appeared on a huge video screen the night of Michelle Obama's speech. "I love you, Daddy!" called out Malia, 10, looking a bit older in a two-toned dress with straps.

Then came election night in Chicago. There was Sasha in a black party dress, bounding gleefully up into her father's arms, planting a big kiss on his cheek — a reminder that young children were about to live in the White House for the first time since Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and before them, the younger Kennedy kids, Caroline and John.

And of course there was the inauguration. Who could resist the sight of Malia, in a periwinkle-blue coat and fluffy black scarf, snapping pictures from her enviable perch on the inaugural podium?

Just the night before, she and Sasha, whose inaugural outfit was a light pink coat, had danced onstage with the Jonas Brothers — a perfect example of how, as much as her parents vowed to keep their lives as normal as possible, the girls were truly celebrities from Day One.

For the president and first lady, protecting their privacy was an evolving skill. Candidate Obama quickly regretted, for example, an all-family interview granted to the TV show "Access Hollywood."

Once the family arrived at the White House, strict arrangements were in place. The news media traditionally respects the privacy of a president's young children and doesn't photograph or report on them unless they are in a public setting with their parents.

Yet the couple constantly talks about their kids. At times the president has embarrassed them, as when he told an audience that Malia once got a 73 on a science test. (He later apologized.)

Two years ago, when Malia first went to summer camp, the White House discouraged mention of it in the media, even though Obama mentioned it in interviews. And recently he revealed the state where both daughters had just spent a month at camp — New Hampshire.

"They just love talking about their girls," says Sobieraj. "They get genuine joy from them, and so they talk about it. To a degree that makes the staff uncomfortable, because the line is shifting."

Other White House kids have led less public lives, perhaps a function of the times. Jackie Kennedy was so concerned about keeping her kids out of view that she organized kindergarten for Caroline inside the White House, writes Doug Wead, an expert on presidential offspring, in "All the President's Children." (She was out of town when her husband allowed those famous photos of Caroline and John in the Oval Office to be taken, Wead writes.)

And Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton were extremely protective of Chelsea, who entered the White House at an awkward stage. Her parents were furious when Mike Myers referred to their daughter in an insulting way on "Saturday Night Live"; the comic later apologized.

Whereas many White House children through history seem to suffer some sort of embarrassment or scandal, the Obama girls have had none.

"Compared to other White House families, this is clearly the most functional," says Wead, who chronicles a host of misfortunes of past White House kids in his book. (He's now working on a book about White House siblings.) "This has been one of the most successful stories."

McBride, who now directs programming on the history of first ladies at American University, says that no matter your politics, it's comforting to see a happy first family.

"Whether you support this president or not, you want to know that it's healthy and grounding and going well at home," she says. "They clearly are a family that's got it together."

The Obamas certainly relish spending time with their kids. The first family is well known to have dinner together in the White House most nights; Michelle Obama in her convention speech evoked the image of the family "strategizing about middle-school friendships."

That will likely help the president avoid some of the guilt that, Wead says, has afflicted some presidents of the past who spent little time with their offspring — like that which he says overcame Ulysses S.

Grant on the occasion of his daughter's White House wedding. She left on her honeymoon, and Wead says the president then collapsed on her bed and wept.

"He had been so busy as president that he felt he had missed her life," Wead says. "It all had happened too fast for him."


AM News Links: August jobs report due out, Neil Armstrong to be buried at sea, and more

$
0
0

Two people from Wisconsin who recently tested positive for West Nile virus have died, although it's still to be confirmed whether the individuals' deaths are linked to the virus, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is reporting. If so, it would be the first fatalities linked to the virus in the state in four years.

Democratic ConventionPresident Barack Obama waves with his wife Michelle and his daughters Malia and Sasha after his speech to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)


NOTE: Users of modern browsers can open each link in a new tab by holding 'control' ('command' on a Mac) and clicking each link.

Fact Check: President Obama's claim that money saved from winding down wars can be spent at home misleading

$
0
0

President Barack Obama laid claim to a peace dividend that doesn't exist when he told the nation he wants to use money saved by ending wars to build highways, schools and bridges.

CALVIN WOODWARD, Associated Press
TOM RAUM, Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama laid claim to a peace dividend that doesn't exist when he told the nation he wants to use money saved by ending wars to build highways, schools and bridges.

The wars were largely financed by borrowing, so there is no ready pile of cash to be diverted to anything else.

The claim was one of several by Obama in his acceptance speech Thursday at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., and by Vice President Joe Biden in earlier remarks that did not match the facts. A look at some of their assertions:

OBAMA: "I'll use the money we're no longer spending on war to pay down our debt and put more people back to work — rebuilding roads and bridges, schools and runways. After two wars that have cost us thousands of lives and over a trillion dollars, it's time to do some nation-building right here at home."

THE FACTS: The idea of taking war savings to pay for other programs is budgetary sleight of hand, given that the wars were paid for with increased debt. Obama can essentially "pay down our debt," as he said, by borrowing less now that war is ending. But he still must borrow to do the extra "nation-building" he envisions.

He made a similar statement in his State of the Union address, and it is no less misleading now than in January. And the savings appear to be based at least in part on inflated war spending estimates for future years.

___

OBAMA: "We will reform and strengthen Medicare for the long haul, but we'll do it by reducing the cost of health care, not by asking seniors to pay thousands of dollars more."

THE FACTS: Some of the proposals the Obama administration has floated in budget negotiations with Congress would ask Medicare beneficiaries to pay more. Among them: revamping co-payments and deductibles in ways that could raise costs for retirees and increasing premiums for certain beneficiaries.

Obama even indicated a willingness to consider raising the eligibility age, currently 65, to 67. As word of some of the proposals leaked out, the president faced a backlash from fellow Democrats. He has since said he would not accept Medicare cuts as a part of a deficit reduction deal, unless it also includes higher taxes on the wealthy. Still, some level of increased costs for middle-class and upper-income Medicare recipients is likely to be part of any future deficit reduction deal.

___

OBAMA: "We can help big factories and small businesses double their exports, and if we choose this path, we can create a million new manufacturing jobs in the next four years."

THE FACTS: Obama has claimed an increase of some 500,000 manufacturing jobs over the past 29 months. But this is cherry picking by the president. From the beginning of Obama's term 3 1/2 years ago, manufacturing jobs have declined by more than 500,000, according to the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Manufacturing jobs have been on a steady decline for nearly two decades.

Even though there has been a modest uptick in manufacturing jobs this year, unless there is a major turnaround, it seems unlikely that Obama's goal of 1 million new manufacturing jobs can be reached by his target date of 2016.

___

OBAMA: "And now you have a choice: We can give more tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas or we can start rewarding companies that open new plants and train new workers and create new jobs here in the United States of America."

BIDEN: "Gov. Romney believes that in the global economy, it doesn't much matter where American companies put their money or where they create jobs. As a matter of fact, he has a new tax proposal — the territorial tax — that experts say will create 800,000 jobs, all of them overseas."

THE FACTS: Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney's proposal is actually aimed at encouraging investment in the U.S., not overseas.

The U.S. currently has a global tax system that is filled with credits, exemptions and deductions that enable many companies to avoid U.S. taxes and provides an incentive for corporations to keep their profits in other countries. Whether Romney's plan would spur investment in the U.S. is debatable, but it's not a plan aimed at dispersing profits abroad.

Experts differ on the impact of a territorial system on employment in the U.S. But Biden's implication that Romney's plan sends jobs abroad is not supported by the expert opinion he cites.

Kimberly Clausing, an economics professor at Reed College in Portland, Ore., said a pure territorial tax system could increase employment in low-tax countries by 800,000. But that did not mean U.S. jobs moving overseas. Clausing later wrote: "My analysis does not speak to the effects on jobs in the United States."

___

OBAMA: "You can choose a future where we reduce our deficit without wrecking our middle class. Independent analysis shows that my plan would cut our deficits by $4 trillion."

THE FACTS: Three years ago, Obama pledged to cut in half the deficit "we inherited" by the end of his first term, a mark he's set to miss by a wide margin. The deficit when he took office was $1.2 trillion, and the $800 billion stimulus bill Obama signed soon afterward increased the shortfall to over $1.4 trillion. The White House predicts this year's federal budget deficit will end up at $1.2 trillion, marking the fourth consecutive year of trillion dollar-plus red ink.

Obama's new $4 trillion target over 10 years resets the goalposts with some fancy budget footwork. For one thing, it includes $1 trillion in cuts already signed into law. And it assumes that Congress will pass the administration's plan to raise the capital gains tax, boost taxes on households earning over $250,000 a year and impose a minimum 30 percent tax on incomes above $1 million. It also assumes a reduction in the amount of interest the government must pay on its debt.

___

BIDEN: "After the worst job loss since the Great Depression, we've created 4.5 million private sector jobs in the past 29 months."

THE FACTS: This seems to be a favorite statistic, because many speakers at the convention cited it. But it's misleading — a figure that counts jobs from when the recession reached its trough and employment began to grow again. It excludes jobs lost earlier in Obama's term, and masks the fact that joblessness overall has risen over Obama's term so far.

As well, in the same 29 months that private sector jobs grew by 4.5 million, jobs in the public sector declined by about 500,000, making the net gain in that period about 4 million.

Overall, some 7.5 million jobs were lost during the recession that began in December 2007 in President George W. Bush's term and ended officially in June 2009 with Obama as president.

Never since World War II has the economy been so slow to recover all the jobs lost in a downturn.

___

OBAMA: "Millions of students are paying less for college today because we finally took on a system that wasted billions of taxpayer dollars on banks and lenders."

THE FACTS: "Technically it is true," said Bryan Cook, director of the Center for Policy Analysis at the American Council on Education. "How much of a savings is not clear."

Large increases in federal Pell Grants, GI Bill benefits and the 2009 American Opportunity Tax Credit led to a significant increase in the amount of aid provided to students who qualify for these benefits. The current per year maximum Pell Grant is $5,550 — $900 higher than it was in 2008 for a program that serves more than 9 million students.

Under the Obama administration, Congress passed legislation requiring all federal loans be issued through the Education Department; previously, they were also issued by private lenders. This will also probably mean students pay less in the long term.

___

OBAMA: "In 2014, our longest war will be over."

THE FACTS: Although most U.S. troops will leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014, thousands are likely to stay and continue a U.S. presence for years. There is no telling what fighting they might be drawn into, despite the decision to end the U.S. combat role.

Military leaders and administration officials have not yet said how many will stay, asserting that such decisions are far from being made. But analysts say the U.S. envisions a post-2014 force of as many as 20,000 American troops to continue training the Afghan forces, hunt terrorists and keep watch on Iran and other nations in the region.

___

BIDEN: "What they didn't tell you is that the plan they've put down on paper would immediately cut benefits to more than 30 million seniors already on Medicare. What they didn't tell you is the plan they're proposing would cause Medicare to go bankrupt by 2016."

THE FACTS: Biden wasn't referring to any Medicare plan of Romney or running mate Paul Ryan, but to the consequences of fully repealing Obama's health care law, which is unpopular with seniors even though it has sweetened Medicare in certain ways. A Medicare plan put forward by Ryan in Congress would have no immediate effect because it would apply only to future retirees.

Obama's health care law improved Medicare benefits, adding better coverage for beneficiaries with high prescription costs as well as removing co-pays for a set of preventive benefits. If the law is repealed, those benefits would be lost unless Congress decides otherwise.

Similarly, Romney's promise to restore Obama's $716 billion in Medicare cuts could have unintended consequences for the program. The cuts don't affect seniors directly, instead falling on hospitals, insurers and other service providers. Restoring the higher payments to providers would accelerate the depletion of Medicare's trust fund for inpatient care, from 2024 currently to 2016, unless Congress acts to stave that off.

___

Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Stephen Ohlemacher, Christine Armario and Paul Wiseman contributed to this report.

President Bill Clinton wrote convention speech himself

$
0
0

The former president also went completely off-script at times.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Former President Bill Clinton was responsible for writing his Wednesday speech at the Democratic National Convention, according to a story from U.S. News & World Report.

The story attributes the information to former Clinton speechwriter Michael Walden, who says the original speech was penned on an ordinary yellow notepad.

From the story:

Even after being loaded into the teleprompter, Clinton reintroduced some of the lines that had been edited out.


"Things that were written that were cut out, wound up being said anyway," Walden says. "I think he knows what he is doing."

Clinton also went completely off-script at times. The Atlantic posted a copy of the former president's speech as prepared, with his insertions in italics and highlighted, and his deletions struck out.

Watch Clinton's speech in full.

Letters to the Editor: Democrats sound same old party line, trickle-down plan hurt economy and more

$
0
0

Letter writer: Just trying to be fair and balanced with the news.

Democrats sound same old party line

Democratic Convention 9512.jpgDelegates cheer during the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Wednesday.

The Democrats have unleashed another Hollywood production called the Democratic National Convention. It was the same party line on display again – raise taxes, over-regulate the business community and increase spending on entitlements with no way to pay for it.

Democrats never mention any accountability about the millions of dollars spent on these programs. And, of course, in President Obama’s mind, they create jobs by growing the government.

The Obama administration has done nothing but stifle job growth. Along with small business, the private sector is the engine that drives our economy. The Democrats don’t seem to get that. As Mitt Romney has stated, the left doesn’t like people who work hard and become successful on their own because, of course, that creates “evil capitalists.”

– JIM SOTIROPOULOS, Longmeadow


Trickle-down plan hurt U.S. economy

George Bernard Shaw got it right. “If history repeats itself, and the unexpected always happens, how incapable must Man be of learning from experience.”

People started panicking; economists told us not to worry. Then the banks failed. Unemployment rose. The policies of one president and his inability to understand the scope of the issues led to a slow reaction to the crisis.

A new president stimulated the economy by building infrastructure and shoring up the banks. Unemployment decreased. GDP increased. Things stabilized and were headed (slowly) in the right direction. Sound familiar?

No, it’s not 2012. This is what happened from 1929 to 1937. Then, suddenly unemployment shot up and GDP went negative. The economy went into a tailspin.

What happened? The government stopped public works deficit spending. The Fed tightened the money supply to stop inflation. Taxes on workers increased (from new Social Security taxes). How do we manage this mess? The Fed has (mostly) increased the money supply.

The wealthy should pay their fair share. We need to create jobs by repairing our roads and bridges. Trickle-down Reaganonomics didn’t work before and won’t work now. The choice is clear.

– ANDREW WILLIS, Palmer


Please, no whining from Yankee fan

This is in response to a recent letter to the editor from a Yankee fan who suggested that New York cut its budget like the Red Sox have.

In 2009, the Yankees payroll was $220 million, while the Red Sox were at $120 million. Since then the Yankees have reduced their payroll to about $195 million this year while the Red Sox have raised theirs to $175-180 million.

During this spending spree by the Red Sox, they have failed to make the playoffs, and as a result of poor play this year, unloaded some of their high priced players.

The Yankees have a goal to continue reducing their payroll to below $180 million by 2014.

In addition, a little over $100 million of the payroll goes to five players: Jeter, ARod, CC Sabathia, Mo Rivera and Teixiera, all possible Hall of Famers.

So the Yankee fan who wrote should enjoy the fact that the Yankees develop/acquire great players to watch, spend money wisely and then make the playoffs most every year, producing 27 World Championships.

– MIKE QUINLAN, Southampton


Don’t fault Mitt for eating lobster

This is to the writer who complained that Mitt Romney was eating lobster in New Hampshire:

Are you aware that lobster is very inexpensive at this time of year and that Romney was paying for his own lobster?Are you also aware that the President and invited guests very often dine on Kobe beef at Wednesday evening dinner parties?

Kobe beef is heavily marbled, exceptionally smooth beef and almost prohibitively expensive. The price for Kobe can range from $49 to $69 per pound. For the very best Kobe beef the price can be from $274 to $519 per pound. Should we ask who was paying for these dinners?

Just trying to be fair and balanced with the news.

– SUSAN J. DANTON, Springfield

Massachusetts Primary roundup: U.S. Rep. Richard Neal, former Springfield Mayor Michael Albano among winners

$
0
0

Other winners included Laura Gentile in a 4-way Hampden County Clerk of Courts Democratic primary.

090612 richard neal celebration.JPGU.S. Rep. Richard E. Neal, D-Springfield, celebrates his re-election Thursday night at the Community Music School of Springfield. Behind him from left: Springfield Mayor Domenic J. Sarno, State Rep.Stephen Kulik, Pittsfield Mayor Daniel L. Bianchi and State Sen. Gale Candaras.

Two former Springfield mayors were winners in Thursday’s Democratic Primary.

While President Barack Obama was preparing to deliver his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., town clerks across Massachusetts were tabulating primary results.

U.S. Rep. Richard E. Neal, a former Springfield mayor, won election to the newly created 1st Congressional District in Thursday’s Democratic primary, beating Berkshire Middle District Register of Deeds Andrea Nuciforo Jr. of Pittsfield and Bill Shein, a writer and activist from Alford.

With no Republican or Green-Rainbow candidates in the race, Neal should be the winner of the seat in the Nov. 6 general election.

Following his 19th victory for the seat that he first won in 1988, Neal said, “Tell them what you’re for, and tell them what you’re against. You don’t have to disparage a person’s character.”

A three-way race for the Democratic nomination for the open Western Massachusetts seat on the Governor’s Council – the Colonial-era panel that votes whether to confirm a governor’s judicial nominations – was narrowly won by former Springfield Mayor Michael J. Albano of Longmeadow. He defeated lawyer Kevin J. Sullivan from Westfield and Chicopee City Councilor Gerry Roy.

In the Republican primary for the same seat on the Governor’s Council, Michael Franco defeated Michael Case.

U.S. Rep. James P. McGovern handily won election to the newly redrawn 2nd Congressional District, which covers central Massachusetts and 63 towns extending as far west as Northampton and east to Westborough, including parts of the Pioneer Valley, Quabbin, north Worcester County and the Blackstone Valley.

McGovern fended off a challenge from William B. Feegbeh, a substitute teacher at Sullivan Middle School in Worcester.

State legislators overhauled the 1st Congressional seat as part of redistricting based on the 2010 census, eliminating one of the two current seats based in Western Massachusetts. The new seat, comprising 87 cities and towns, now includes roughly 60 percent of the district of U.S. Rep. John W. Olver, an Amherst Democrat, who is retiring after 20 years in Washington, and 40 percent of the old district of Neal.

The unusual Thursday primary election was scheduled to prevent conflict with Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year that begins Sept. 16, and the fact that many polling places involve schools and religious facilities, state Secretary of State William F. Galvin said. State primary elections are normally scheduled on the third Tuesday of September. Also, state election officials wanted to avoid conflict with the Democratic National Convention that began Tuesday.

Longmeadow Republican Marie Angelides trounced opponent Enrico “Jack” Villamaino III, a former East Longmeadow selectman for the 2nd Hampden state representative seat, after Villamaino became embroiled in a voter fraud investigation and literally disappeared from the political landscape, although not from the ballot.

Since Villamaino became the focus of a state investigation into alleged voter fraud, he resigned from the East Longmeadow Board of Selectmen and appeared to stop actively campaigning.

Angelides, a juvenile court lawyer, will face incumbent Brian Ashe, D-Longmeadow, in the November election.

Despite several crucial races, election officials predicted a dismal voter turnout, which is typical for a state primary. Galvin predicted that turnout statewide would be less than 15 percent. Springfield Election Commissioner Gladys Oyola also predicted a low voter turnout, possibly 10 percent of registered voters.

In Springfield, voter turnout was 15.05 percent, compared to 11.44 percent in the 2010 primary.

The race for Hampden Superior Court clerk was won by Laura S. Gentile of Springfield, an assistant Hampden Superior Court clerk. In a close race she defeated Thomas M. Ashe, a Springfield city councilor as well as Linda A. Stec DiSanti, a legal administrator from Chicopee and John P. DaCruz, a Ludlow lawyer and former Ludlow selectman.

Ashe took Springfield, while Gentile had the most votes in Agawam, Chester, Holland, Montgomery, Palmer, Southwick, Wilbraham and Wales.

Reached by phone, Ashe said he had conceded the race.

With no Republican candidates for the Hampden County clerk of courts, she is on target to claim the job in January.

The Hampden clerk of courts position is being vacated after one term by Brian P. Lees, an East Longmeadow Republican and former Senate Minority leader who has been one of the best known political figures in Hampden County for the past two decades.

In the contest for the Hampden District state Senate seat, State Sen. James T. Welch, D-West Springfield, fended off a challenge from Springfield City Councilor Melvin A. Edwards.

The newly redrawn Hampden District consists of West Springfield as well as numerous wards in Chicopee and Springfield.

In the 9th Hampden Distrct, state Rep. Sean M. Curran, D-Springfield, seeking re-election to a fifth term, fended off a challenge from Joseph R. Fountain, a substitute teacher in the Springfield public schools. Fountain, who ran unsuccessfully last year for an at-large seat on the Springfield City Council, received 26 percent of the vote Thursday compared to 74 percent of the vote taken by Curran.

In Hampshire county, a three-way Democratic primary for register of deeds was won by Mary Olberding, a human resources manager from Belchertown. She eked out a victory over Bonnie MacCracken, an Amherst title examiner and Timothy O’Leary, a Southampton real estate lawyer.

She will compete against Northampton Treasurer George R. Zimmerman who is running as an independent in the November election.

In a Democratic faceoff for Franklin County register of deeds, lawyer Scott A. Cote of Greenfield pulled an upset, defeating incumbent Joseph A. Gochinski of Greenfield.

Also in Franklin county, in the Democratic primary for Superior Court clerk Susan K. Emond of Bernardston, the current first assistant clerk of the court, defeated David R. Roulston of Greenfield.

For the 5th Hampden District state representative seat Ward 5 Councilor Linda L. Vacon succeeded in getting her name on the Nov. 6 ballot for state representative as the Republcian Party nominee.

Vacon, a two-term councilor, will face Councilor at Large Aaron M. Vega who won big to be the Democratic nominee in the Nov. 6 election.

For a 2nd Franklin District state representative seat, incumbent Rep. Denise Andrews, D-Orange, fended off a challenge by Genevieve C. Fraser of Orange, Jim White of Phillipston and Rebecca J. Bialecki of Orange.


President Barack Obama accepts party nomination, describes 'choice between 2 fundamentally different visions for the future' at Democratic National Convention

$
0
0

Obama reiterated to the delegates and the potential millions watching on TV and the Internet what many Democrats have said in their own speeches- the American Dream is at stake. Watch video

090612 barack obama speech.JPGPresident Barack Obama addresses the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Outlining what he sees as "two fundamentally different visions for the future," President Barack Obama accepted his party's nomination in a speech that energized the Democratic National Convention Thursday evening and officially kicked of the last leg of the campaign against Republican Mitt Romney.

Although some questioned how Obama would follow-up on the address given by former President Bill Clinton on Wednesday, the commander-in-chief brought the crowd to their feet several times and drew thunderous applause while party insiders hoped the content of his speech provided enough of his ideas to convince undecided swing-state voters to give him a second look.

In his prime-time speech, Obama reiterated to the delegates and the millions watching on TV and the Internet what many Democrats have said in their own speeches – the American Dream is at stake.

"When all is said and done – when you pick up that ballot to vote – you will face the clearest choice of any time in a generation. Over the next few years, big decisions will be made in Washington, on jobs and the economy; taxes and deficits; energy and education; war and peace – decisions that will have a huge impact on our lives and our children’s lives for decades to come," Obama said. “On every issue, the choice you face won’t be just between two candidates or two parties. It will be a choice between two different paths for America. A choice between two fundamentally different visions for the future."

In his pitch for another four years, Obama said that no one should expect things to be quick or easy, but he said that with more time and perhaps even compromise from Republicans in Congress, things can move along more quickly.

"You didn’t elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is, it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades," Obama said. "It will require common effort, shared responsibility, and the kind of bold, persistent experimentation that Franklin Roosevelt pursued during the only crisis worse than this one. And by the way – those of us who carry on his party’s legacy should remember that not every problem can be remedied with another government program or dictate from Washington."

Obama also said that the way forward from November must involve Washington and the citizens rallying not just around a political party or candidate, but a set of ideas and goals. The goals generally discussed by Obama touch on a number of areas all central to economic prosperity in the eyes of the Democrats.

"I’m asking you to rally around a set of goals for your country – goals in manufacturing, energy, education, national security and the deficit; a real, achievable plan that will lead to new jobs, more opportunity, and rebuild this economy on a stronger foundation," Obama said. "That’s what we can do in the next four years, and that’s why I’m running for a second term as President of the United States.”"

As the 2012 Democratic National Convention came to a close with a post-speech celebration, Romney and Obama will have just 61 days to convince the still undecided voters across the country that their party's way forward offers the best chance for a prosperous future.


Below are President Obama's remarks as prepared for delivery:

Michelle, I love you. The other night, I think the entire country saw just how lucky I am. Malia and Sasha, you make me so proud…but don't get any ideas, you're still going to class tomorrow. And Joe Biden, thank you for being the best Vice President I could ever hope for.

Madam Chairwoman, delegates, I accept your nomination for President of the United States.

The first time I addressed this convention in 2004, I was a younger man; a Senate candidate from Illinois who spoke about hope – not blind optimism or wishful thinking, but hope in the face of difficulty; hope in the face of uncertainty; that dogged faith in the future which has pushed this nation forward, even when the odds are great; even when the road is long.

Eight years later, that hope has been tested – by the cost of war; by one of the worst economic crises in history; and by political gridlock that's left us wondering whether it's still possible to tackle the challenges of our time.

I know that campaigns can seem small, and even silly. Trivial things become big distractions. Serious issues become sound bites. And the truth gets buried under an avalanche of money and advertising. If you're sick of hearing me approve this message, believe me – so am I.

But when all is said and done – when you pick up that ballot to vote – you will face the clearest choice of any time in a generation. Over the next few years, big decisions will be made in Washington, on jobs and the economy; taxes and deficits; energy and education; war and peace – decisions that will have a huge impact on our lives and our children's lives for decades to come.

On every issue, the choice you face won't be just between two candidates or two parties.

It will be a choice between two different paths for America.

A choice between two fundamentally different visions for the future.

Ours is a fight to restore the values that built the largest middle class and the strongest economy the world has ever known; the values my grandfather defended as a soldier in Patton's Army; the values that drove my grandmother to work on a bomber assembly line while he was gone.

They knew they were part of something larger – a nation that triumphed over fascism and depression; a nation where the most innovative businesses turned out the world's best products, and everyone shared in the pride and success – from the corner office to the factory floor. My grandparents were given the chance to go to college, buy their first home, and fulfill the basic bargain at the heart of America's story: the promise that hard work will pay off; that responsibility will be rewarded; that everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules – from Main Street to Wall Street to Washington, DC.

I ran for President because I saw that basic bargain slipping away. I began my career helping people in the shadow of a shuttered steel mill, at a time when too many good jobs were starting to move overseas. And by 2008, we had seen nearly a decade in which families struggled with costs that kept rising but paychecks that didn't; racking up more and more debt just to make the mortgage or pay tuition; to put gas in the car or food on the table. And when the house of cards collapsed in the Great Recession, millions of innocent Americans lost their jobs, their homes, and their life savings – a tragedy from which we are still fighting to recover.

Now, our friends at the Republican convention were more than happy to talk about everything they think is wrong with America, but they didn't have much to say about how they'd make it right. They want your vote, but they don't want you to know their plan. And that's because all they have to offer is the same prescription they've had for the last thirty years:

"Have a surplus? Try a tax cut."

"Deficit too high? Try another."

"Feel a cold coming on? Take two tax cuts, roll back some regulations, and call us in the morning!"

Now, I've cut taxes for those who need it – middle-class families and small businesses. But I don't believe that another round of tax breaks for millionaires will bring good jobs to our shores, or pay down our deficit. I don't believe that firing teachers or kicking students off financial aid will grow the economy, or help us compete with the scientists and engineers coming out of China. After all that we've been through, I don't believe that rolling back regulations on Wall Street will help the small businesswoman expand, or the laid-off construction worker keep his home. We've been there, we've tried that, and we're not going back. We're moving forward.

I won't pretend the path I'm offering is quick or easy. I never have. You didn't elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is, it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades. It will require common effort, shared responsibility, and the kind of bold, persistent experimentation that Franklin Roosevelt pursued during the only crisis worse than this one. And by the way – those of us who carry on his party's legacy should remember that not every problem can be remedied with another government program or dictate from Washington.

But know this, America: Our problems can be solved. Our challenges can be met. The path we offer may be harder, but it leads to a better place. And I'm asking you to choose that future. I'm asking you to rally around a set of goals for your country – goals in manufacturing, energy, education, national security, and the deficit; a real, achievable plan that will lead to new jobs, more opportunity, and rebuild this economy on a stronger foundation. That's what we can do in the next four years, and that's why I'm running for a second term as President of the United States.

We can choose a future where we export more products and outsource fewer jobs. After a decade that was defined by what we bought and borrowed, we're getting back to basics, and doing what America has always done best:

We're making things again.

I've met workers in Detroit and Toledo who feared they'd never build another American car. Today, they can't build them fast enough, because we reinvented a dying auto industry that's back on top of the world.

I've worked with business leaders who are bringing jobs back to America – not because our workers make less pay, but because we make better products. Because we work harder and smarter than anyone else.

I've signed trade agreements that are helping our companies sell more goods to millions of new customers – goods that are stamped with three proud words: Made in America.

After a decade of decline, this country created over half a million manufacturing jobs in the last two and a half years. And now you have a choice: we can give more tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, or we can start rewarding companies that open new plants and train new workers and create new jobs here, in the United States of America. We can help big factories and small businesses double their exports, and if we choose this path, we can create a million new manufacturing jobs in the next four years. You can make that happen. You can choose that future.

You can choose the path where we control more of our own energy. After thirty years of inaction, we raised fuel standards so that by the middle of the next decade, cars and trucks will go twice as far on a gallon of gas. We've doubled our use of renewable energy, and thousands of Americans have jobs today building wind turbines and long-lasting batteries. In the last year alone, we cut oil imports by one million barrels a day – more than any administration in recent history. And today, the United States of America is less dependent on foreign oil than at any time in nearly two decades.

Now you have a choice – between a strategy that reverses this progress, or one that builds on it. We've opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration in the last three years, and we'll open more. But unlike my opponent, I will not let oil companies write this country's energy plan, or endanger our coastlines, or collect another $4 billion in corporate welfare from our taxpayers.

We're offering a better path – a future where we keep investing in wind and solar and clean coal; where farmers and scientists harness new biofuels to power our cars and trucks; where construction workers build homes and factories that waste less energy; where we develop a hundred year supply of natural gas that's right beneath our feet. If you choose this path, we can cut our oil imports in half by 2020 and support more than 600,000 new jobs in natural gas alone.

And yes, my plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet – because climate change is not a hoax. More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke. They're a threat to our children's future. And in this election, you can do something about it.

You can choose a future where more Americans have the chance to gain the skills they need to compete, no matter how old they are or how much money they have. Education was the gateway to opportunity for me. It was the gateway for Michelle. And now more than ever, it is the gateway to a middle-class life.

For the first time in a generation, nearly every state has answered our call to raise their standards for teaching and learning. Some of the worst schools in the country have made real gains in math and reading. Millions of students are paying less for college today because we finally took on a system that wasted billions of taxpayer dollars on banks and lenders.

And now you have a choice – we can gut education, or we can decide that in the United States of America, no child should have her dreams deferred because of a crowded classroom or a crumbling school. No family should have to set aside a college acceptance letter because they don't have the money. No company should have to look for workers in China because they couldn't find any with the right skills here at home.

Government has a role in this. But teachers must inspire; principals must lead; parents must instill a thirst for learning, and students, you've got to do the work. And together, I promise you – we can out-educate and out-compete any country on Earth. Help me recruit 100,000 math and science teachers in the next ten years, and improve early childhood education. Help give two million workers the chance to learn skills at their community college that will lead directly to a job. Help us work with colleges and universities to cut in half the growth of tuition costs over the next ten years. We can meet that goal together. You can choose that future for America.

In a world of new threats and new challenges, you can choose leadership that has been tested and proven. Four years ago, I promised to end the war in Iraq. We did. I promised to refocus on the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11. We have. We've blunted the Taliban's momentum in Afghanistan, and in 2014, our longest war will be over. A new tower rises above the New York skyline, al Qaeda is on the path to defeat, and Osama bin Laden is dead.

Tonight, we pay tribute to the Americans who still serve in harm's way. We are forever in debt to a generation whose sacrifice has made this country safer and more respected. We will never forget you. And so long as I'm Commander-in-Chief, we will sustain the strongest military the world has ever known. When you take off the uniform, we will serve you as well as you've served us – because no one who fights for this country should have to fight for a job, or a roof over their head, or the care that they need when they come home.

Around the world, we've strengthened old alliances and forged new coalitions to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. We've reasserted our power across the Pacific and stood up to China on behalf of our workers. From Burma to Libya to South Sudan, we have advanced the rights and dignity of all human beings – men and women; Christians and Muslims and Jews.

But for all the progress we've made, challenges remain. Terrorist plots must be disrupted. Europe's crisis must be contained. Our commitment to Israel's security must not waver, and neither must our pursuit of peace. The Iranian government must face a world that stays united against its nuclear ambitions. The historic change sweeping across the Arab World must be defined not by the iron fist of a dictator or the hate of extremists, but by the hopes and aspirations of ordinary people who are reaching for the same rights that we celebrate today.

So now we face a choice. My opponent and his running mate are new to foreign policy, but from all that we've seen and heard, they want to take us back to an era of blustering and blundering that cost America so dearly.

After all, you don't call Russia our number one enemy – and not al Qaeda – unless you're still stuck in a Cold War time warp. You might not be ready for diplomacy with Beijing if you can't visit the Olympics without insulting our closest ally. My opponent said it was "tragic" to end the war in Iraq, and he won't tell us how he'll end the war in Afghanistan. I have, and I will. And while my opponent would spend more money on military hardware that our Joint Chiefs don't even want, I'll use the money we're no longer spending on war to pay down our debt and put more people back to work – rebuilding roads and bridges; schools and runways. After two wars that have cost us thousands of lives and over a trillion dollars, it's time to do some nation-building right here at home.

You can choose a future where we reduce our deficit without wrecking our middle class. Independent analysis shows that my plan would cut our deficits by $4 trillion. Last summer, I worked with Republicans in Congress to cut $1 trillion in spending – because those of us who believe government can be a force for good should work harder than anyone to reform it, so that it's leaner, more efficient, and more responsive to the American people.

I want to reform the tax code so that it's simple, fair, and asks the wealthiest households to pay higher taxes on incomes over $250,000 – the same rate we had when Bill Clinton was president; the same rate we had when our economy created nearly 23 million new jobs, the biggest surplus in history, and a lot of millionaires to boot.

Now, I'm still eager to reach an agreement based on the principles of my bipartisan debt commission. No party has a monopoly on wisdom. No democracy works without compromise. But when Governor Romney and his allies in Congress tell us we can somehow lower our deficit by spending trillions more on new tax breaks for the wealthy – well, you do the math. I refuse to go along with that. And as long as I'm President, I never will.

I refuse to ask middle class families to give up their deductions for owning a home or raising their kids just to pay for another millionaire's tax cut. I refuse to ask students to pay more for college; or kick children out of Head Start programs, or eliminate health insurance for millions of Americans who are poor, elderly, or disabled – all so those with the most can pay less.

And I will never turn Medicare into a voucher. No American should ever have to spend their golden years at the mercy of insurance companies. They should retire with the care and dignity they have earned. Yes, we will reform and strengthen Medicare for the long haul, but we'll do it by reducing the cost of health care – not by asking seniors to pay thousands of dollars more. And we will keep the promise of Social Security by taking the responsible steps to strengthen it – not by turning it over to Wall Street.

This is the choice we now face. This is what the election comes down to. Over and over, we have been told by our opponents that bigger tax cuts and fewer regulations are the only way; that since government can't do everything, it should do almost nothing. If you can't afford health insurance, hope that you don't get sick. If a company releases toxic pollution into the air your children breathe, well, that's just the price of progress. If you can't afford to start a business or go to college, take my opponent's advice and "borrow money from your parents."

You know what? That's not who we are. That's not what this country's about. As Americans, we believe we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights – rights that no man or government can take away. We insist on personal responsibility and we celebrate individual initiative. We're not entitled to success. We have to earn it. We honor the strivers, the dreamers, the risk-takers who have always been the driving force behind our free enterprise system – the greatest engine of growth and prosperity the world has ever known.

But we also believe in something called citizenship – a word at the very heart of our founding, at the very essence of our democracy; the idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another, and to future generations.

We believe that when a CEO pays his autoworkers enough to buy the cars that they build, the whole company does better.

We believe that when a family can no longer be tricked into signing a mortgage they can't afford, that family is protected, but so is the value of other people's homes, and so is the entire economy.

We believe that a little girl who's offered an escape from poverty by a great teacher or a grant for college could become the founder of the next Google, or the scientist who cures cancer, or the President of the United States – and it's in our power to give her that chance.

We know that churches and charities can often make more of a difference than a poverty program alone. We don't want handouts for people who refuse to help themselves, and we don't want bailouts for banks that break the rules. We don't think government can solve all our problems. But we don't think that government is the source of all our problems – any more than are welfare recipients, or corporations, or unions, or immigrants, or gays, or any other group we're told to blame for our troubles.

Because we understand that this democracy is ours.

We, the People, recognize that we have responsibilities as well as rights; that our destinies are bound together; that a freedom which only asks what's in it for me, a freedom without a commitment to others, a freedom without love or charity or duty or patriotism, is unworthy of our founding ideals, and those who died in their defense.

As citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government.

So you see, the election four years ago wasn't about me. It was about you. My fellow citizens – you were the change.

You're the reason there's a little girl with a heart disorder in Phoenix who'll get the surgery she needs because an insurance company can't limit her coverage. You did that.

You're the reason a young man in Colorado who never thought he'd be able to afford his dream of earning a medical degree is about to get that chance. You made that possible.

You're the reason a young immigrant who grew up here and went to school here and pledged allegiance to our flag will no longer be deported from the only country she's ever called home; why selfless soldiers won't be kicked out of the military because of who they are or who they love; why thousands of families have finally been able to say to the loved ones who served us so bravely: "Welcome home."

If you turn away now – if you buy into the cynicism that the change we fought for isn't possible…well, change will not happen. If you give up on the idea that your voice can make a difference, then other voices will fill the void: lobbyists and special interests; the people with the $10 million checks who are trying to buy this election and those who are making it harder for you to vote; Washington politicians who want to decide who you can marry, or control health care choices that women should make for themselves.

Only you can make sure that doesn't happen. Only you have the power to move us forward.

I recognize that times have changed since I first spoke to this convention. The times have changed – and so have I.

I'm no longer just a candidate. I'm the President. I know what it means to send young Americans into battle, for I have held in my arms the mothers and fathers of those who didn't return. I've shared the pain of families who've lost their homes, and the frustration of workers who've lost their jobs. If the critics are right that I've made all my decisions based on polls, then I must not be very good at reading them. And while I'm proud of what we've achieved together, I'm far more mindful of my own failings, knowing exactly what Lincoln meant when he said, "I have been driven to my knees many times by the overwhelming conviction that I had no place else to go."

But as I stand here tonight, I have never been more hopeful about America. Not because I think I have all the answers. Not because I'm naïve about the magnitude of our challenges.

I'm hopeful because of you.

The young woman I met at a science fair who won national recognition for her biology research while living with her family at a homeless shelter – she gives me hope.

The auto worker who won the lottery after his plant almost closed, but kept coming to work every day, and bought flags for his whole town and one of the cars that he built to surprise his wife – he gives me hope.

The family business in Warroad, Minnesota that didn't lay off a single one of their four thousand employees during this recession, even when their competitors shut down dozens of plants, even when it meant the owners gave up some perks and pay – because they understood their biggest asset was the community and the workers who helped build that business – they give me hope.

And I think about the young sailor I met at Walter Reed hospital, still recovering from a grenade attack that would cause him to have his leg amputated above the knee. Six months ago, I would watch him walk into a White House dinner honoring those who served in Iraq, tall and twenty pounds heavier, dashing in his uniform, with a big grin on his face; sturdy on his new leg. And I remember how a few months after that I would watch him on a bicycle, racing with his fellow wounded warriors on a sparkling spring day, inspiring other heroes who had just begun the hard path he had traveled.

He gives me hope.

I don't know what party these men and women belong to. I don't know if they'll vote for me. But I know that their spirit defines us. They remind me, in the words of Scripture, that ours is a "future filled with hope."

And if you share that faith with me – if you share that hope with me – I ask you tonight for your vote.

If you reject the notion that this nation's promise is reserved for the few, your voice must be heard in this election.

If you reject the notion that our government is forever beholden to the highest bidder, you need to stand up in this election.

If you believe that new plants and factories can dot our landscape; that new energy can power our future; that new schools can provide ladders of opportunity to this nation of dreamers; if you believe in a country where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules, then I need you to vote this November.

America, I never said this journey would be easy, and I won't promise that now. Yes, our path is harder – but it leads to a better place. Yes our road is longer – but we travel it together. We don't turn back. We leave no one behind. We pull each other up. We draw strength from our victories, and we learn from our mistakes, but we keep our eyes fixed on that distant horizon, knowing that Providence is with us, and that we are surely blessed to be citizens of the greatest nation on Earth.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless these United States.

Results of DA's probe of accidental shooting of Britteny Miles by Agawam police officer Danielle Petrangelo due to be released

$
0
0

Hampden District Attorney Mark Mastroianni said lots of recent investigations into deaths regarding police slowed his progress probing an accidental shooting of a civilian in Agawam by one of that city's police officers.

DSC_3626.jpgThis was the scene at Elizabeth Manor Apartments at 238 Maple St. in Agawam May 5 when police accidentally shot Britteny Miles while responding to a domestic call.

SPRINGFIELD – Hampden County District Attorney Mark Mastroianni said Friday that he has completed his probe of a May 5 accidental shooting in Agawam by a member of that city’s Police Department and that resulted in injury to a civilian.

Mastroianni said he expects to reduce his findings, including whether any charges should be filed against the police officer, to writing next week.

The district attorney said he has taken so long to complete his investigation of the Agawam shooting because his office has had a number of similar probes involving police officers on its plate.

He said they include the investigation into the death of Westfield Police Officer Jose Torres, who was struck by a truck July 26 while working on a traffic detail on Pontoosic Road in Westfield and a probe into the death of Springfield Police Officer Kevin Ambrose, who was shot while responding to a domestic call June 4 in Springfield. Also, he said his office had to look into an April 13 incident in Chicopee that involved the shooting of a state trooper and the suicide of Carlos Gonzalez-Lauger after a two-hour standoff with police while holding his former girlfriend and their young son hostage.

Most recently, his office has had to launch a probe into alleged voter fraud in East Longmeadow, Mastroianni pointed out.

All those cases involve extensive review, according to Mastroianni, who said, “I certainly do my best to do as thorough a review as possible.”

Meanwhile, the Agawam police officer, Danielle Petrangelo, remains on paid administrative leave pending any recommendations Mastroianni makes, according to Agawam Police Lt. Richard Light and Mayor Richard A. Cohen.

A second officer, Thomas L. Forgues, who responded to the disturbance at Elizabeth Manor apartments with Petrangelo, was initially placed on administrative leave as well, but was soon returned to active duty.

MILES NEWS large.jpgBritteney Miles

Petrangelo and Forgues responded to a call, received shortly before 4:30 a.m. reporting a break-in and possible domestic disturbance at the apartment complex, according to city police. While the officers were outside the dwelling they could hear yelling and the breaking of glass, a press released issued directly after the shooting stated.

Petrangelo’s weapon discharged and struck 21-year-old Britteny Miles upon police gaining entry to the apartment, according to the press release.

Miles, who suffered a shattered jaw and underwent surgery, would require numerous additional surgeries her attorney, Frank E. Flannery, told The Republican shortly after the shooting. Flannery, who acts as spokesman for the victim, could not be reached for comment.


West Springfield to study what impact Springfield casino might have on city

$
0
0

Town Councilor Brian J. Griffin wants to head off any negative impacts a casino in Springfield coudl have on West Springfield.

Kathleen Bourque horiz mug 2012.jpgKathleen Bourque

WEST SPRINGFIELD – Town Council President Kathleen A. Bourque has agreed to form a committee that would consider any negative effects on the city as the result of a casino being sited in Springfield such as increased traffic and public safety.

There are currently four competing proposals on the table by developers who want to build a casino in Springfield as the state has authorized creating one in Western Massachusetts. A casino has been touted as a way to revitalize Springfield. Three of the proposals are for downtown Springfield and one is for a site on Page Boulevard.

Bourque agreed to form a committee during Tuesday’s Town Council meeting at the request of Town Councilor Brian J. Griffin. Griffin’s proposal did not generate any discussion. Bourque said Friday she is happy to accommodate Griffin’s request and plans to appoint a committee soon.

“All kinds of things happen when there is a huge project just half a mile away from you,” Griffin said Friday. “Clearly, there are going to be impacts on our town and we want to get out out ahead of it.”

The Legislature that allows for the building of casino requires that the host community agreement with a gaming operation take into account the venture’s impact on the region as well as outline and require the developer to mitigate any problems that arise from its impact on the region, according to Griffin.

According to Griffin, factors that may be considered include, but are not limited to traffic, public safety, increases in the school population and infrastructure.

The councilor submitted a written request to Bourque dated Sept. 4 in which he requested a committee be formed “to safeguard the rights of the Town of West Springfield.”

Griffin has asked that the city form a Town Council mitigation study committee that would include but not be limited to representatives from the mayor’s office, the Department of Public Works, the Planning Department and the Economic Development Department.

“I believe this is necessary to ensure that any and all rights of the Town of West Springfield are fully protected,” Griffin wrote.

He has also recommended that the committee seek out the expertise of the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission in identifying all the areas with the potential to be impacted.

Common Cause director: Massachusetts close to bottom in U.S. in contested elections

$
0
0

Leading the list of unopposed candidates will be U.S. Rep. Richard E. Neal, D-Springfield and U.S. Rep. James P. McGovern, D-Worcester, who both cruised to victory against opponents in the reconfigured First and Second Congressional Districts.

Gallery preview

SPRINGFIELD — Despite predictions for a huge turnout for the November presidential election, voters will find a relatively sparse sampling of races on the state and local ballots.

By winning primaries Thursday, candidates for Congress, the state Legislature and some municipal posts will get a free ride in November, thanks to the state’s tradition of one-party domination, public apathy and cynicism toward politics and other factors.

“Unfortunately, Massachusetts tends to be close to the bottom (nationwide) in contested races,” said Pamela H. Wilmot, executive director of Common Cause, Massachusetts, Inc., a non-profit government watchdog group.

“Lack of competition is absolutely not a good thing; competition is a hallmark of democracy,” she said.

Leading the list of unopposed candidates will be U.S. Rep. Richard E. Neal, D-Springfield and U.S. Rep. James P. McGovern, D-Worcester, who both cruised to victory against opponents in the reconfigured 1st and 2nd Congressional Districts.

McGovern fended off a challenge from William B. Feegbeh, a substitute teacher at Sullivan Middle School in Worcester. Neal kept his career undefeated steak alive by triumphing in a three-way primary over challengers Andrea Nuciforo Jr., a former state senator from Pittsfield, and political newcomer Bill Shein, a humorist and activist from Alford.

Likewise, few local members of the state Senate or House of Representatives will face opponents in the Nov. 6 election.

None of the region’s six state senators — five Democrats and one Republican — is opposed in the general election. And more than two dozen House members will also cruise to re-election with no challengers, including Republican incumbents in Palmer and Westfield.

All three incumbent House Democrats from Hampshire County have no opposition.

In contested races, Rep. Brian M. Ashe, a Longmeadow Democrat, could be facing a more difficult re-election bid after redistricting stripped his district of two precincts in the Forest Park section of Springfield that were important to his victory in the 2010 election.

The new 2nd Hampden District gained ground in East Longmeadow and now tilts more Republican, possibly an advantage for Ashe’s GOP challenger, Marie Angelides of Longmeadow.

In the 3rd Hampden District, first-term Republican Nicholas A. Boldyga, a Southwick Republican, also faces a challenge from Agawam Democrat Samuel S. DiSanti Jr., who could benefit from a tide of Democratic-leaning voters typical for a presidential election year in Massachusetts.

In Franklin County, lawyer Scott A. Cote of Greenfield will face no opposition in November after defeating incumbent Joseph A. Gochinski, of Greenfield. In another uncontested race, Franklin Superior Court clerk Susan K. Emond, of Bernardston, the current first assistant clerk of the court, will have no opponent. Emond defeated her primary opponent, David R. Roulston, of Greenfield.

By defeating three opponents for the Hampden Superior Court Clerk’s post Thursday, Laura S. Gentile is guaranteed the job in January; she has no opponents in the November election.

While voter participation in Springfield, Holyoke and Chicopee primaries hovered in the 15 to 16 percent area, a much larger turnout is being predicted for the November election, when former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney will try to unseat President Barack Obama.

A second contest – U.S. Senator Scott Brown, R-Mass. vs. Democrat Elizabeth Warren – will help boost the turnout.

Chicopee City Clerk Keith Rattell is predicting a 67 percent turnout locally for Nov. 6, an increase of 51 percent from Thursday's contest.

“I’m hoping we’ll push it higher, to 70 percent,” said Rattell. “When you have a presidential election, it really brings everyone out,” he said.

U.S. declares Pakistan-based Haqqani network a terrorist body

$
0
0

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's decision, signed Friday ahead of a Sunday deadline set by Congress, bans Americans from doing business with members of the group and blocks any assets it holds in the United States.

By BRADLEY KLAPPER and MATTHEW LEE

082298 jalaluddin haqqani.jpg08.22.1998 — Jalaluddin Haqqani, founder of the militant group the Haqqani network, speaks during an interview in Miram Shah, Pakistan. The Obama administration declared Friday that the Pakistan-based Haqqani network of militants is a terrorist body. (AP Photo/Mohammed Riaz, File)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration declared Friday that the Pakistan-based Haqqani network of militants is a terrorist body despite misgivings about how the largely symbolic act could further stall planned Afghan peace talks or put yet another chill on the United States' already fragile counterterrorism alliance with Islamabad.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's decision, signed Friday ahead of a Sunday deadline set by Congress, bans Americans from doing business with members of the group and blocks any assets it holds in the United States. The order, which will go into effect within 10 days, completes an odyssey of sorts for the Haqqanis from the days they partnered with the CIA during the Cold War and were hailed as freedom fighters.

Clinton, whose advisers were of two minds about whether the designation was the right path, said in a statement Friday that the U.S. will "also continue our robust campaign of diplomatic, military and intelligence pressure on the network, demonstrating the United States' resolve to degrade the organization's ability to execute violent attacks."

Enraged by a string of high-profile attacks on U.S. and NATO troops, Congress insisted Clinton deliver a report on whether the Haqqanis should be designated a terrorist organization and all of its members subjected to U.S. financial sanctions.

A subsidiary of the Taliban and based in the remote North Waziristan region of Pakistan, the Haqqani network is responsible for several attacks in Kabul, including last September's rocket-propelled grenade assault on the U.S. Embassy and NATO headquarters. American officials estimate its force at 2,000 to 4,000 fighters and say it maintains close relationships with al-Qaida.

U.S. defense officials said the administration doesn't believe the Haqqanis have designs to attack the United States. But they said the group shelters al-Qaida and other militant groups, allowing them to plan and train for possible operations targeting the U.S.

The U.S. already has sanctioned many Haqqani leaders and is pursuing its members militarily. But it resisted the terrorist designation because of worries that it could jeopardize reconciliation efforts between the U.S. government and insurgents in Afghanistan, and ruffle feathers with Pakistan, the Haqqanis' longtime benefactor.

"The only reservation — and it's only a mild one — is whether this complicates reconciliation at all," said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said. "I see only a very small downside to the designation and that's more than offset by the financial pressure on the network."

Friday's decision also could complicate talks to free the only U.S. prisoner of war from the Afghan conflict, Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a 26-year-old from Idaho who has been held by the Haqqanis since 2009.

State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell dodged questions about reported Haqqani threats to further mistreat Bergdhal as a result of the designation but said the U.S. was doing everything it could to free him.

"He's just been held for too long," Ventrell told reporters.

American officials have held talks with Ibrahim Haqqani, the brother of the network's founder, Jalauddin Haqqani, to try to further peace talks with the Taliban, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the negotiation attempts. The designation does not stop the U.S. from meeting with the Haqqanis, who've been among the least interested in talking reconciliation before American troops make an almost complete withdrawal from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, officials said.

Officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

The designation risks straining U.S.-Pakistan relations. Last year, outgoing Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen argued that the Haqqani network "acts as a veritable arm" of Pakistani intelligence — the most far-reaching volley in a long dispute between Washington and Islamabad.

Other U.S. officials dispute that assessment but still accuse Islamabad of giving the network a free hand in North Waziristan region and providing it some logistical support. The accusation could take on added significance now that the Haqqanis are officially a foreign terrorist organization — something the U.S. hasn't issued for the Taliban.

Sherry Rehman, the Pakistani ambassador in Washington, brushed off the designation, calling it an internal U.S. matter and noting that Haqqanis are not Pakistani nationals.

"It's not our business," she said, but added that Pakistan would maintain its counterterrorism cooperation with the United States.

Islamabad says that its forces are stretched thin in fighting an insurgency that already has killed more than 30,000 people and that it cannot also take on the Haqqanis near the Afghan border. Many analysts attribute the military's reluctance to take them on to historical ties and an assessment that the group can be an important ally in Afghanistan after U.S. and allied forces withdraw.

Imtiaz Gul, head of the Islamabad-based Centre for Research and Security Studies, predicted little additional fallout in a relationship that has suffered severe blows in the last 20 months, including a CIA contractor's killing of two Pakistanis, the unilateral U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden and NATO's accidental killing of two dozen Pakistani soldiers. But he said the U.S. sanctions wouldn't prompt a Pakistani crackdown or hurt the Haqqanis significantly.

"They are not a corporate sector entity maintaining bank accounts and working via the Internet doing banking transactions online," said Gul. "They operate covertly through intermediaries."

Fighters for the head of the network, Jalauddin Haqqani, were among the leading recipients of CIA money during the 1980s Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, when U.S. money helped finance Afghan rebels. They ousted the Russians in February 1989, overthrowing the Moscow-backed government in Kabul three years later before turning their guns on each other.

Haqqani developed extensive foreign contacts over the years, getting money, weapons and supplies from Pakistani intelligence and serving as justice minister after the Soviets left, and minister of tribal and border affairs after Taliban fundamentalists seized power in 1996. He joined the Taliban insurgency when the U.S. helped overthrow the regime after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Since then, the network has developed a sophisticated, mafia-style financing operation that relies on extortion, kidnapping, smuggling and legitimate businesses, according to a recent report by the Combating Terrorism Center in West Point, N.Y.

Last month, the U.S. scored a major counterterror success when an unmanned drone strike in Pakistan near the Afghan border killed one of Haqqani's sons, Badruddin, considered the group's No. 3.

The State Department said in May 2011 that Badruddin Haqqani sat on the Miram Shah Shura, a group that controls all Haqqani network activities and coordinates attacks in southeastern Afghanistan. It also blamed him for the 2008 kidnapping of New York Times reporter David Rohde.

The U.S. already had designated Haqqani and his sons individually as terrorists, but Congress wanted tougher action. In July, it set a deadline to prod the administration into imposing blanket sanctions on the group.

Lee reported from Vladivostok, Russia. Associated Press writers Sebastian Abbot and Kathy Gannon in Islamabad, and Kimberly Dozier and Donna Cassata in Washington contributed to this report.

Whitey Bulger defense: Feds spent 17 years demonizing mobster

$
0
0

During a contentious hearing in U.S. District Court in Boston, prosecutors said the defense is trying to influence potential jurors by denigrating witnesses.

By DENISE LAVOIE | AP Legal Affairs Writer

BOSTON — Lawyers for mobster James "Whitey" Bulger on Friday accused prosecutors of vilifying Bulger, while prosecutors said the defense is trying to influence potential jurors by denigrating witnesses.

Whitey Bulger police mug 62411.jpgJames "Whitey" Bulger

The two sides traded accusations during a contentious hearing in U.S. District Court.

Attorney J.W. Carney Jr. said the U.S. Attorney's Office "demonized" Bulger — the former leader of the Winter Hill Gang — during the nearly 17 years he was a fugitive, "to an extent never before seen in New England." Carney said his comments to reporters simply repeat what he says in court. He said a complaint by prosecutors that he is trying to influence the jury pool "doesn't even pass a laugh test."

Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Kelly accused Carney of violating a local rule of U.S. District Court which prohibits attorneys from releasing information or opinion if there is a "'reasonable likelihood" that it will interfere with a fair trial. Prosecutors said in court documents they believe Carney has impugned the credibility of government attorneys and law enforcement officials when speaking to reporters.

Kelly asked Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler to order Carney to comply with the rule. Bowler instructed both Carney and Kelly to review the rule. After Carney said he has not violated the rule, Bowler reminded Carney to "re-read the rule and refresh your recollection of it."

Bulger is awaiting trial for allegedly participating in 19 murders. The trial is set to begin in March, but the defense has repeatedly complained that prosecutors have flooded it with hundreds of thousands of documents in a disorganized and redundant way, making it difficult for them to prepare for the trial.

Bulger's attorney has said he will take the stand in his own defense at his trial to testify that someone within the U.S. Department of Justice gave him immunity to commit crimes while he was an FBI informant against the Mafia, his gang's main rival.

Bulger, now 82, was captured in Santa Monica, Calif., last year after fleeing Boston in late 1994, just before he was indicted.

Another one of Bulger's lawyers, Hank Brennan, complained that the more than 350,000 pages of discovery material turned over by prosecutors is filled with multiple copies of the same document, which has significantly slowed the defense as it prepares for trial. Brennan said the discovery included 45 different versions of one particular document.

Bowler said she was satisfied that prosecutors had properly followed discovery rules and produced more evidence than required under the rules. She said it is up to the defense to organize the documents in its own way.

"To me, that's trial preparation," she said. "It will take time, but that's your job."

West Nile Virus threat forces rescheduling of high school sports in Chicopee, Belchertown

$
0
0

The move affects Chicopee High School, Chicopee Comprehensive High School, and Belchertown High School.

chic football2.JPGBecause of an elevated threat level for West Nile Virus in Chicopee, nighttime outdoor sports will be rescheduled earlier in the day to avoid mosquitoes. Games like this Nov. 14, 2011 matchup between Chicopee High and Chicopee Comp will for the foreseeable future no longer be under the lights.

CHICOPEE - Concerns with West Nile Virus in Chicopee and Belchertown, two Western Massachusetts communities listed under the state’s critical threat warning, have prompted the high schools in each community to reschedule all evening outdoor sports to lessen contact with the mosquitoes that spread the virus.

Officials with Chicopee and Belchertown public schools said Friday night that effective immediately all evening sports played outdoors - primarily soccer and football - will have to be rescheduled to earlier in the day for the remainder of the fall.

The move affects Chicopee High School, Chicopee Comprehensive High School, and Belchertown High School.

The football and soccer teams for each school typically schedule games for after 5:30 p.m., which places players, coaches, referees and spectators outside during periods of prime mosquito activity.

Mosquitoes are most active from dusk to dawn.

Bissonnette on Friday posted on his Facebook page that the city Parks Department will be asking all private sports organizations that play games in Chicopee to consider rescheduling to minimize player exposure.

The state Department of Public Health has declared Chicopee and Belchertown have a threat-level of critical for West Nile Virus following confirmed cases in each locality recently.

In Chicopee, a 69-year-old man was found to have West Nile Virus in late August. At last report he was making a full recovery.

In Belchertown, a 21-year-old horse was found to be infected with the virus and had to be euthanized.

The state DPH has elevated threat level for the rest of the state to moderate.

There have been nine cases involving humans and one fatality across Massachusetts. A 69-year-old Worcester man with underlying health issues who was diagnosed with the virus last month recently died, according to DPH officials.

West Nile is a mosquito-carried virus that can cause illness ranging from a mild fever to more serious disease like encephalitis or meningitis. People older than 50 are considered at high risk of developing severe illness.

The state recommends several precautions for avoiding exposure to mosquitoes, but one of the leading ones is to avoid being outside for prolonged periods from dusk to dawn.

And that, said Chicopee Athletic Director James Blain, puts his school athletic schedule at conflict with the state guidelines.

Or at least it did until Friday afternoon when it was decided to change the sports schedule.

He said he met Friday with Mayor Michael Bissonnette and members of the Health Department to discuss the critical threat level and ways to avoid exposure.

“The decision was that we are not going to play sports at the period of peak mosquito activity,” he said.

The move affects only home games in Chicopee and road games to Belchertown, he said.

If Chicopee has road games scheduled in any other community not considered critical, say Westfield or Northampton, they would go on as scheduled, he said.

The change in place until the state Board of Health lifts the critical alert, but realistically it will be in place for the rest of the fall, he said.

Belchertown Athletic Director Robert Marchewka confirmed Belchertown schools will reschedule night games for the rest of the fall in keeping with guidelines from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

It affects soccer and football only. The only other evening sport, volleyball, is played indoors, he said.

He referred all other inquiries to Superintendent of Schools Judith Houle.

Blain said the move immediately affects football and soccer, but it could also impact other outdoor sports, he said. As sunset gets earlier and earlier each day, other sports and practices that start earlier in the afternoon could spill over into the prime mosquito time, he said.

“Nothing like this has ever happened before,” he said.

Games have been canceled previous because of bad weather, but never because of mosquitoes and a potential health hazard.

Blain, who is responsible for athletic programs at the two schools, said “We’re going week by week.”

Rescheduling the games to more suitable times will be a logistical nightmare but it has to be done, he said. “I’ve got Monday and Tuesday covered. How’s that sound?”

Viewing all 62489 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>